Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:49:53.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new genus of hymenolepid cestodes from the Indian gerbil, Tatera indica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Anil Wason
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Jodhpur, Jodhpur 342001, India
Sylvester Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Jodhpur, Jodhpur 342001, India

Abstract

Paraoligorchis taterae gen. et sp.n. is described from the Indian gerbil Tatera indica. It is characterised by unarmed suckers; rudimentary and unarmed rostellum; 4–7 testes of which 1–2 are aporal and anterior to others which are in a transverse row; cirrus pouch extending beyond excretory stems; unilateral genital pores; genital ducts dorsal to excretory stems; prominent external and internal seminal vesicles; large rosette-like ovary; saccular uterus; vaginal opening posterior to that of the cirrus pouch; three-layered eggs devoid of both a pyriform apparatus and polar filaments. It has been compared with related genera of Hymenolepidinae and Anoplocephalinae and found to differ from all of these in some character or other.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baylis, H. A. (1926) Some parasitic worms from Sarawak. Sarawak Museum Journal, 10, 303322.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1906) Die Hymenolepis Arten der Vogel. Centralblat für Bakteriologie, I Abt., 41, 7989.Google Scholar
Hunkler, P. (1974) Les cestodes parasites des petits mammiferes (rongeurs et insectivores) de Cote-d’Ivoire et de Haute-Volta. Revue Suisse Zoologie, 80, 809830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johri, L. N. (1934) Report on a collection of cestodes from Lucknow. Record of the Indian Museum, 36, 153177.Google Scholar
Jones, A. W. (1943) Protogynella blarinae n.g. n. sp., a new cestode from the shrew, Blarina brevicauda Say. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 62, 169173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meggitt, F. J. (1927) On cestodes collected in Burma. Parasitology, 19, 141153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. F. (1954) Four new species of cestodes of rodents from the high plains, central and southern rockies and notes on Catenotaenia dendritica. Journal of Parasitology, 40, 245254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spassky, A. A. (1951) Osnovy cestodologii v. 1. pp. 735. Moskova.Google Scholar
Spassky, A. A. (1954) Pseudoparasitism of cestodes—hymenolepids of rapacious animals. (Russian text.) Doklady Akademii Nauk, SSSR n.s., 94, 597599.Google Scholar
Spassky, A. A. (1956) Vidovoj sostav roda Paranaplocephala (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae). (Russian text.) Trudy gelmint lab AN SSSR, 7, 120167.Google Scholar
Tenora, F. (1976) Tapeworms of the family Anoplocephalidae Cholodkowsky, 1902. Evolutionary implications. Acta Scientifica Naturales; Brno, 10, 137.Google Scholar
Weinland, D. F. (1858) An essay on the tapeworms of man. pp.93. Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1959) Systema Helminthum. II. The cestodes of vertebrates. pp.860. Interscience Publ. Inc.; New York.Google Scholar
Zarnowski, E. (1956) Robaki pasozytnicze drobnych ssakow lesnych (Rodentia: Insectivora) okolicy Pulaw (Woj. lubelskie) I. Cestoda. Acta Parasitologia Polonica, 3, 279368.Google Scholar