Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:34:06.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Resistance to Schistosome Infection of Neonatal Mice born to Immune Mothers with a Demonstration of Increased Resistance in Lactating Mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

M. G. Taylor ,
D. A. Denham  and
G. S. Nelson
M. G. Taylor
Affiliation:
Medical Helminthology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
D. A. Denham
Affiliation:
Medical Helminthology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
G. S. Nelson
Affiliation:
Medical Helminthology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An attempt was made to demonstrate passive transfer of immunity using neonatal mice born to mothers resistant to schistosome infection. No immunity was demonstrated in the baby mice, suggesting that the classes of antibody which are active in this immune system are not transferrable neonatally.

An interesting incidental finding was the apparent enhanced resistance of lactating mice compared to normal females or males and this was confirmed in another experiment. There was no significant difference between the susceptibility of normal females and male mice. More male worms were recovered from male mice than from virgin female mice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 45 , Issue 2-3 , June 1971 , pp. 223 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, M. A. and Nelson, G. S., 1969.—“Studies on heterologous immunity in schistosomiasis. III. Further observations on the development of heterologous immunity in mice.” Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 41, 225–232.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. A. and Smithers, S. R., 1970.—“The use of in vitro cultivation in the study of immunity against schistosomes.” J. Parasit., 56, (4) Section II (1), 57–58.Google Scholar
Disko, R. and Kampitz, H. E., 1969.—“Growth inhibition in experimentally infected lactating mice.” Ztschr. ParasitKde., 32, (1), 11–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Gelfand, M., Clarke, V. DE V., and Turnbull, C., 1964.—“The detection of antibodies to Schistosoma spp. in newly born infants of mothers having the same antibodies.” J. trop. Med. Hyg., 67, 254.Google ScholarPubMed
Hillyer, G. V., Menéndez-Corrada, R., Lluberes, R. and Hernández Morales, F., 1970.—“Evidence of a transplacental passage of specific antibody in schistosomiasis mansoni in man.” Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 19, (2), 289–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, P. and Goatly, K. D., 1963.—“Observations on pericercarial reactions of sera in schistosomiasis in Tanganyika.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 57, 184–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, E. M. and Jordan, P., 1968.—“Transplacental transfer of antibodies to Schistosoma mansoni and their persistence in infants.” Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 62, 630–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, G. S., Amin, M. A., Saoud, M. F. A. and Teesdale, C., 1968.—“Studies on heterologous immunity in schistosomiasis I. Heterologous schisto some immunity in mice.” Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 38, 9–17.Google Scholar
Purnell, R. E., 1966.—“Host-parasite relationships in schistosomiasis. II. The effects of age and sex on the infection of mice and hamsters with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 60, 94–99.Google Scholar
Smithers, S. R. and Terry, R. J., 1969.—“The immunology of schistosomiasis.” Advances in Parasitology, 7, 41–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinmann, C. J., 1960.—“Experimental infection of neonatal mice born of mothers infected with Schistosoma mansoni.” J. Parasit., 46, 854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar