Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:37:39.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Nomenclature of the Vinegar Eelworm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

B. G. Peters
B. G. Peters
Affiliation:
Research Scholar of the Grocers' Company. (From the Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This eelworm, only just visible to the naked eye, and quite common in vinegar in all parts of the world, has long been known to zoologists, and indeed was an object of keen interest and discussion to the naturalists of the seventeenth century. Petrus Borellus [3], for instance, enthusiastic over the recent adoption of the microscope for researches in natural history, published in 1656 his “Observationum Microcospicarum Centuria,” in which he leads off with a note “De Vermibus aceti.” In the twelfth edition of the “Systema Naturae” (1767), Linnaeus included a species redivivum in that final genus of the Regnum Animale so appropriately named Chaos. This species of animal he says, “Habitat in Aceto & Glutine Bibliopegorum.”.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 1927 , pp. 133 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bastian, H. C., 1865.—“Monograph on the Anguillulidæ,” Trans. Linn. Soc., XXV, pp. 73–180, 5 pl.Google Scholar
[2]Baylis, H. A. and Daubney, R., 1926.—“A Synopsis of the Families and Genera of Nematoda,” pp. 1–277+ XXXVI (London).Google Scholar
[3]Borellus, Petrus, 1656. —“Observationum Microcospicarum Centuria” (3rd part of “De vero Telescopii Inventore …”), PP. 1–45 (Hagae-comitum).Google Scholar
[4]Diesing, K. M., 1851.—“Systema Helminthum,” v. ii (Vindobonæ).Google Scholar
[5]Dujardin, M. F., 1845.—“Histoire Naturelle des Helminthes,” pp. 108, 109, 239–244 (Paris).Google Scholar
[6]Ehrenberg, C. G., 1838.—“Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen,” pp. 82, 83 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
[7]Goeze, J., 1774.—“Mikroskopische Erfahrungen über die Essigaale,” Natur-forscher, I, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
[8]Goodey, T., 1922.—“The Eel-worm in Paper-hangers' Paste [Anguillula rediviva (Linnæus, 1767) Stiles and Hassall, 1905],” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., X, pp. 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Hemprich, F. G. and Ehrenberg, C. G., 1828.—“Symbolæ Physicæ…” (Pars II: Evertebrata), no pagination (Berolini).Google Scholar
[10]LinnÆus, C., 1767.—“Systema Naturæ,” 12th Edition, p. 1326 (Holmiæ).Google Scholar
[11]De Man, J. G., 1910.—“Beiträge zur Kenntnis der in dem weissen Schleimfluss der Eichen lebenden Anguilluliden,” Zool. Jahrb. (Abt. f. Syst.), xxv, pp. 359–394.Google Scholar
[12]MÜller, O. F., 1773.—“Vermium Terrestrium et Fluviatilium seu…” Infusoria, p. 41 (Hauniæ et Lipsiæ).Google Scholar
[13]MÜller, O. F., 1776.—“Zoologiæ Danicæ prodromus…,” p. 202 (Hauniæ).Google Scholar
[14]MÜller, O. F., 1783.—“Anmerkungen beym Durchlesen einiger Aufätze in dem 10 ersten Stucken des Naturforschers,” Naturforscher, xix, pp. 161–163.Google Scholar
[15]MÜller, O. F., 1786.—“Animalcula Infusoria fluviatilia et marina…,” pp. 43, 63–67; pi. IX, figs. 1–4 (Hauniæ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]“IXe Congrès international de Zoologie”, 1914.—Section VII: “Nomenclature,” pp. 815–915 (Rennes).Google Scholar
[17]Oken, L., 1815.—“Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte,” Teil 3, Abt. 1 (Leipzigund Jena). [Not consulted.]Google Scholar
[18]Schneider, A., 1866.—“Monographie der Nematoden” (Berlin).Google Scholar
[19]Sherborn, C. D., 1902.—“Index Animalium…,” Section 1: 1758–1800 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
[20]Sherborn, C. D. 1922.—“Index Animalium…,” Section 2: 1801–1850 (London).Google Scholar
[21]Stiles, C. W. and Hassall, A., 1905.—“The Determination of Generic Types…,” pp. 1–150 (Washington).Google Scholar