Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:10:25.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance in Chickens and Turkeys of Chicken-Adapted Heterakis gallinarum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Everett E. Lund ,
Anne M. Chute  and
Sara L. Myers
Everett E. Lund
Affiliation:
Beltsville Parasitological Laboratory, Animal Disease and Parasite Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
Anne M. Chute
Affiliation:
Beltsville Parasitological Laboratory, Animal Disease and Parasite Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
Sara L. Myers
Affiliation:
Beltsville Parasitological Laboratory, Animal Disease and Parasite Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Helerakis gallinarum recovered from chickens, and apparently having lived exclusively or predominantly in chickens for several years, thrived better in chickens than in turkeys, when several hundred embryonated eggs were given in a single feeding.

2. Use of a smaller inoculum reduced the difference in the worm's performance in its traditional host and the new host species.

3. Performance in both species of host was the same following the feeding of small numbers of eggs from worms grown 1 generation in turkeys.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 97 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clapham, P. A., 1933.—“On the prophylactic action of Vitamin A in helminthiasis.” J. Helminth., 11, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, P. A., 1934.—“Some observations on the response of chickens to infestation with Heterakis gallinae.” J. Helminth., 12, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graybill, H. W. and Smith, T., 1920.—“Production of fatal blackhead in turkeys by feeding embryonated eggs of Heterakis papulosa.” J. exp. Med., 31, 647–655.Google Scholar
Kendall, S. B., 1959.—“The occurrence of Histomonas meleagridis in Heterakis gallinae.” Parasitology, 49, 169–172.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E., 1958.—“Growth and development of Heterakis gallinae in turkeys and chickens infected with Histomonas meleagridis.” J. Parasit., 44, 297–301.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E., 1967a.—“U.S.D.A. makes progress on soil test for blackhead.” Poultry Meat, 4, A40–42.Google Scholar
Lund, E. E., 1967b.—“Response of four breeds of chickens and one breed of turkeys to experimental Heterakis and Histomonas infections.” Avian Dis., 11, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, E. E., AND Burtner, R. H. JR., 1957.—“Infectivity of Heterakis gallinae eggs with Histomonas meleagridis.” Expl. Parasit., 6, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, E. E., AND Burtner, R. H. JR., 1958.—“Effect of four embryonation media on the erabryonation and infectivity to chickens of Hts/omonas-bearing eggs of Heterakis.” J. Parasit., 44, 197–200.Google Scholar