Article contents
On money as a conventional sign: revisiting Aristotle's conception of money
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2020
Abstract
Regardless of the historical evolution of money, some passages of Aristotle's works shed light on its meaning and nature. This paper will attentively consider these passages. The first section presents Aristotle's thoughts on money. While the second section analyses money as a unit of measurement, the third section deals with its conventional nature, and the fourth draws from the theories of signs elaborated by John Poinsot and Charles Peirce to expand the explanation of the nature of money as a sign. The conclusion considers three levels of consideration of money based on Aristotle's thoughts: (1) universal abstract money, (2) instantiated in specific currencies, and (3) the actualization of their properties and potentialities in actual economic dealings.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2020
Footnotes
This work has benefitted from comments by John Davis, Julián Giglio, Wade Hands, Rodrigo Laera, Carlo Natali, Fernando Tohmé, Eduardo Scarano, Alejandro Vigo, and three anonymous referees. The usual disclaimer applies.
References
- 3
- Cited by