Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:24:09.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coca, The State, and the Peasantry in Bolivia, 1982-1988

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Extract

Polttical Conflicts between Bolivia and its peasantry over the production and distribution of the coca leaf during the 1980s is the focus of this essay. The first section describes several of Bolivia's comparative disadvantages (among Andean producer nations) for waging effective coca leaf control programs. Following is an analysis of the interplay and results of specific statepeasant conflicts during the 1982-1988 period of civilian democratic rule. To give a Bolivian contextual backdrop to these conflicts, aspects of the national political culture which shape the terms and conditions of the struggle over controversial drug-related issues are explained. A final section presents a brief analysis of the Chapare region's prospects for a successful coca leaf eradication program.

Explanations for the Bolivian government's ineffectual campaign against the coca leaf and cocaine industry range from its status as a weak state to its fragile and deteriorating economy (Healy, 1986). Bolivia's political system holds the world record for changes in government by way of the coup d'etat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bascope, R. (1982) La Veta Blanca, Coca y Cocaína en Bolivia. L. Paz, Bolivia: Ediciones Aquí. Google Scholar
Canelas, O. and J. Canelas-Zannie (1983) Bolívia, Coca-Cocaina, Subdesarrollo y Podér Político. Cochabamba, Bolívia: Los Amigos del Libro. Google Scholar
Carter, W., Mamani, M., Morales, J. and Parkensen, P. (1980) Coca in Bolivia. L. Paz, Bolivia: UFLA/NIDA/TUTAPI. Google Scholar
Craig, R. (1987) “Illicit Drug Traffic: Implications for South American Source Countries.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 29, 2 (Summer): 1-34.Google Scholar
Economist (1988) “Cocaine Economies, Latin America's Killing Fields” (8 October): pp. 21-24.Google Scholar
Foreign Broadcast Information Service (Latin America) (FBIS) (1985a) “Government and Peasant Confederation Reach Accord.” Vol. VI, No. 115 (14 June): CI.Google Scholar
Foreign Broadcast Information Service (Latin America) (FBIS) (1985b) “Three Peasants Killed in Clashes.” Vol. VI, No. 108 (5 June): C2.Google Scholar
Foreign Broadcast Information Service (Latin America) (FBIS) (1984) “Government Peasant Agreement.” Vol. VI, No. 233 (3 December): C4.Google Scholar
Flores, G. and Blanes, J. (1984) Donde Va El Chapare. Cochabamba, Bolivia: CERES. Google Scholar
Flores, G. and Blanes, J. (1983) De Los Valles al Chapare. Cochabamba, Bolívia: CERES. Google Scholar
Healy, K. (1988a) “Bolivia and Cocaine: A Developing Country's Dilemma.” British Journal of Addiction , 83, No. 1 (January): 1923.Google Scholar
Healy, K. (1988b) “Political Activism of the Bolivian Peasant Syndicates in the New Democratic Order of the 1980s.” Columbia-NYU Latin American, Caribbean, and Iberian Occasional Papers, No. 6. Consortium of Columbia University Institute of Latin American and Caribbean Studies (December).Google Scholar
Healy, K. (1986) “The Boom Within the Crisis: Some Recent Effects of Foreign Cocaine Markets on Bolivia Rural Society and Economy, ” pp. 101-145 in D. Pacini and C. Franquemont (eds.), Coca and Cocaine, Effects on People and Policy in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cultural Survival, Inc. Google Scholar
(1985) “The Cocaine Industry in Bolivia — Its Impact on the Peasantry.” Cultural Survival Quarterly 9, 4: 24-30.Google Scholar
Henkel, R. (1989) Coca and Cocaine — The Industry and Its Impact. Tempe, AR: Arizona State University Press (in press). Google Scholar
Hoy, (1988) “Enfrentamiento Entre Productores de Coca y Umopar Causo por lo Menos 10 Muertos.” (3 July).Google Scholar
Hoy, (1987) “Cientos de Vehículos Paralizados por El Bloqueo de los Campesinos.” (28 May).Google Scholar
Hoy, (1986) “Plantean Censura de Bedregal, Barthelemy, Valle y Expulsión de Agentes de la DEA.” (28 October).Google Scholar
LEE, R. (1983) “Latin American Drug Connection.” Foreign Policy 61 (Winter): 142-160.Google Scholar
Movimiento Bolívia Libre (MBL) (1988) Un Camino Nuevo Para Bolivia. L. Paz, Bolívia: Imprenta Metodista.Google Scholar
(El) Opinion (1988) “EEUU No Tiene Autoridad Morál Para Imponer Lucha Anti-Droga.” (19 April).Google Scholar
Pacini, D. and Franquemont, C. (eds.) (1986) Coca and Cocaine, Effects on People and Policy in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cultural Survival, Inc. Google Scholar
(La) Presencia (1988) “DEA Cometé Atropellos Contra Campesinos Productores de Coca.” (1 September).Google Scholar
Roth, E. and Bohurt, R. (1987) Actitudes de la Población de la Paz Hacia la Producción y Consumo de la Hoja de Coca. L. Paz, Bolivia: Centro Indisciplinario de Estudios Comunitarios. Google Scholar
Stern, S. (ed.) (1987) Resistance, Rebellion, and Consciousness in the Andean Peasant World, 18th to 20th Centuries. Madison, WI: University Of Wisconsin Press. Google Scholar
Tropical Research and Development, Inc. (1986) “Evaluation of Chapare Regional Development Project.” Gainesville, FL: In House Report, USAID.Google Scholar
US Congress. House of Representatives. Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control (1986). “Latin American Study Missions Concerning International Narcotics Problems.” Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US General Accounting Office (GAO) (1988) Drug Control, US Supported Efforts in Colombia and Bolivia. Report to Congress, Washington, DC: GAO.Google Scholar