Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:11:28.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mexico: The Unravelling of a Corporatist Regime?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Howard J. Wiarda  and
Carlos Guajardo
Howard J. Wiarda
Affiliation:
Political Science at the University of Massachusetts/Amherst
Carlos Guajardo
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania and the London School of Economics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mexico is Unique among the tyrannies friendly to the United States. Not only does it share a porous, 2000-mile border with the United States, but it is probably more interdependent with the United States on a host of issues — water resources, pollution, energy supplies, tourism, investment, trade, finances, migrant labor, debt, drugs, agriculture, to say nothing of politics and diplomacy — than any other country in the world. What happens in Mexico has profound implications for the United States and viceversa.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , Winter 1988 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was prepared for the Year Two Conference of the Foreign Policy Research Institute Project and will appear in Friendly Tyrants: A us Policy Conundrum (edited by Adam Garfinkle and Daniel Pipes, forthcoming from the Foreign Policy Research Institute). Dr. lêda Siqueira Wiarda commented on an earlier draft of the manuscript. The outline and subheadings of this paper are those provided by the editors of the larger project.

Mexico is a developing Third World country bordering an industrialized First World country. Moreover, there is a risk — albeit small at present — that Mexico may get sucked into the maelstrom of the Central American conflict. Hence Mexico is one of those critical locales, rather like the Caribbean Basin, the Middle East, and southern Africa, where the North-South vortex of conflict and the East-West one intersect.

References

Castaneda, J. (1985) “Don't Corner Mexico.” Foreign Policy 60 (Fall): 75–90.Google Scholar
Cornelius, W. (1987) “México/EU: Las fuentes de pleito.” Nexus 118 (October): 25–35.Google Scholar
Craig, A. and Cornelius, W. (1980) “Political Culture in Mexico: Continuities and Revisionist Interpretations,” pp. 325–393 in Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney (eds.) The Civic Culture Revisited. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Craig, R. (1987) “Illicit Drug Traffic: Implications for South American Source Countries.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 29, 2 (Summer): 1–34.Google Scholar
Garfinkle, A. and Pipes, D. (eds.) (forthcoming) Friendly Tyrants: A US Policy Conundrum. Philadelphia, PA: Foreign Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
Gentleman, J. (forthcoming) The National Action Party and Political Change in Mexico.Google Scholar
Interamerican Development Bank (IDB) (1970-1986) Social and Economic Progress in Latin America. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
Kling, M. (1967) “Violence and Politics in Latin America,” pp. 119-132 in Halmos, Paul (ed.) The Sociological Review (Latin American Sociological Monograph 11). Keele, Staffordshire, England: University of Keele.Google Scholar
Levy, D. and Szekely, G. (1983) Mexico: Paradoxes of Stability and Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pilcher, D. (1981) “The States and Mexico: An Experiment in Cooperation.” State Legislatures 18 (March).Google Scholar
Purcell, S.K. (1988) “Mexico,” in Wesson, Robert (ed.) The Latin American Debt. New York, NY: Frederick A. Praeger for the Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Reyna, J. and Weinert, R. (eds.) (1977) Authoritarianism in Mexico. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues (ISHI).Google Scholar
Sanchez Suzarrey, J. (1988) “¿Corporativismo o Democracia?” Vuelta 136 (March): 12–19.Google Scholar
Shuman, M. (1986) “Dateline Main Street: Local Foreign Policies.” Foreign Policy (Winter): 154–174.Google Scholar
Stevens, E. (1977) “Mexico's PRI: The Institutionalization of Corporatism,” pp. 117–158 in Malloy, James (ed.) Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, E. (1974) Protest and Response in Mexico. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (forthcoming) The Democratic Revolution in Latin America: Implications for Policy. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1988) The Transitions to Democracy in Spain and Portugal: Real or Wishful? Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1987a) Finding Our Way? Toward Maturity in US-Latin American Relations. Lanham, MD: American Enterprise Institute and University Press of America.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1987b) Latin America at the Crossroads: Debt, Development and the Future. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1986) “Can Democracy be Exported? The Quest for Democracy in United States-Latin America Policy,” pp. 325–352 in Middlebrook, Kevin and Rico, Carlos (eds.) The United States and Latin America in the 1980s. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1984) In Search of Policy: The United States and Latin America. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1981) Corporatism and National Development in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1977) Corporatism and Development: The Portuguese Experience. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1975) Transcending Corporatism? The Portuguese Corporative System and the Revolution of 1974. Columbia, SC: Institute of International Affairs, University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Wiarda, H. (1973) “Toward a Framework for the Study of Political Change in the Iberic-Latin World: The Corporative Model.” World Politics 25 Oanuary): 206–235.Google Scholar