Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:12:11.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Economy of MERCOSUR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Luigi Manzetti
Luigi Manzetti*
Affiliation:
Southern Methodist University, North-South Center, University of Miami
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent literature on regional integration has stressed the key role that emerging trading blocs will have in shaping the world economy of the 21st-century. With the end of the Cold War, policymakers have refocused their attention on economic issues. Economic trends — such as rapid changes in research, technology, capital flow, and trade patterns — have assumed a new importance. Increasing competition in world markets has induced industrialized countries to cluster together in regional economic blocs. This has been the case with the European Community (EC), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) signatories (the United States, Canada, and Mexico), and possibly Japan and its East Asian neighbors. However, these experiments in regional integration differ appreciably in nature. For instance, the EC explicitly seeks an economic and political union, whereas the NAFTA is simply a free trade area whose goal is the eventual elimination of restrictions on investment flows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , Winter 1993 , pp. 101 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank Alcides Costa Vaz, Mario Granero, María Eugenia Mujica, and Jeff Stark for their assistance in writing the article, and Jane Marchi and four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the author.

References

Acuña, C. and Smith, W. (forthcoming 1994) “The Politics of ‘Military Economics’ in the Southern Cone: Comparative Perspectives on Democracy and Arms Production in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile,” in Schultz, L., Smith, W.C. and Varas, A. (eds.) Security, Democracy, and Development in the Western Hemisphere. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami North-South Center.Google Scholar
Baldinelli, E. (1990) “Integración Argentina-Brasil: un segundo intento; Crecer.” Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto para el Desarrollo de Empresarios en la Argentina (IDEA).Google Scholar
Baumann, R. and Lerda, J. (1987) A Integração em Debate. São Paulo, Brazil: Marco Zero.Google Scholar
Bouzas, R. (1992) “US-Mercosur Free Trade,” pp. 249–270 in Saborio, Sylvia (ed.) The Premise and the Promise: Free Trade in the Americas. New York, NY: Transaction Books (for the Overseas Development Council).Google Scholar
Business Latin America (1993) “Mercosur: Uncertain Future.” (April): 5.Google Scholar
Carneiro, D. (1993) Author interview with Senator Dirceu Carneiro in Brasilia (Brazil), August.Google Scholar
Carta do Mercosul (São Paulo) (1993) No. 4 (February): 6.Google Scholar
Chudnovsky, D. (1992) “The Future of Hemispheric Integration: The Mercosur and the Enterprise for the Americas Initiative.” Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centra de Investigaciones para la Transformación (CENIT).Google Scholar
Chudnovsky, D. and Porta, F. (1990) “La trayectoria del proceso de integración argentino brasileño. Tendencias y incertidumbres.” Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centra de Investigaciones para la Transformación (CENIT).Google Scholar
Da Motta Veiga, P. (1992) A Evolução do Mercosul no Período de Transição: Hipóteses Alternativas e Cenários (269). Brasilia, Brazil: Institute de Pesquisa Económica Aplicada.Google Scholar
De Melo, J. and Panagariya, A. (1992) The New Regionalism in Trade Policy (mimeo). Washington, DC: World Bank, Center for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Dougherty, J. and Pfaltzgraff, L. Jr. (1990) Contending Theories in International Relations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fuentes, J. (1991) “Compatibilidad entre la integración subregional y hemisférica.” Revista de la CEPAL 45.Google Scholar
Grieco, J. (1990) Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grieco, J. (1988) “Anarchy and Cooperation.” International Organization 42 (Fall): 485–508.Google Scholar
Hirst, M. (1992) Avances y desafios en la formación del MERCOSUR. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO).Google Scholar
Hirst, M. (1988) Argentina-Brasil: El largo camino de la integración. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Legasa.Google Scholar
Instituto de Relaciones Europeo-Latinoamericanas (IRELA) (1992) Prospects for the Process of Sub-Regional Integration in Central and South America. Madrid, Spain: IRELA.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kosacoff, B. (1992) “La presencia actual de las empresas extranjeras en la industria argentina; Su estrategia ante el MERCOSUR.” Paper prepared for the conference on “Apoyo al Proceso Hemisférico de Liberalización Comercial,” Washington (DC), 1-2 December.Google Scholar
Kosacoff, B., Tedesca, J., and Vispo, A. (1991) “La Transformaciones de la industria automotriz argentina; Su integración con Brasil” (Documento de Trabajo CEPAL 40). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Comision Econ6mica para America Latina (CEPAL).Google Scholar
Krasner, S. (1991) “Global Communication and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier.” World Politics 43, 3 (Summer): 336–366.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1992) “The Move Towards Free Trade Zones,” pp.7–41 in Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones (symposium). Kansas City, KS: Federal Reserve Bank.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report-Southern Cone (LARR-SC) (1993) “Integration: Common Tariff Delayed to Year-end.” 5 August (RS-93-06): 7.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report-Southern Cone (LARR-SC) (1992) “Trends: Assessing Mercosur's Size and Potential.” 6 February (RS-92-01): 4–5.Google Scholar
Lahera, E. (1992) “Fundamentos y opciones para la integración de hoy.” Revista de la CEPAL 47.Google Scholar
Lavagna, R. (1991) “Mercosur: asimetrias y política económica comparada.” Buenos Aires, Argentina: Institute para el Desarrollo de Empresarios en la Argentina (IDEA).Google Scholar
Mastanduno, M. (1991) “Do Relative Gains Matter? America's Response to Japanese Industrial Policy.” International Security 16 (Spring): 73–113.Google Scholar
Mols, M. (1993) “The Integration Agenda: A Framework for Comparison,” in Smith, Peter H. (ed.) The Challenge of Integration: Europe and the Americas. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami North-South Center.Google Scholar
Nofal, M. (1993) Economic Integration of Argentina-Brazil, MERCOSUR, and Regionalization in the Southern Cone Market (mimeo). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Nofal & Asociados.Google Scholar
Nofal, M. (1991) “Asimetrías de política industrial y comercio exterior entre Argentina y Brasil.” Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto para el Desarrollo de Empresarios en la Argentina (IDEA).Google Scholar
O'Connell, A. (1992) “La Iniciativa de Las Américas y el Cono Sur de América Latina: Un punto de vista argentino.” Paper prepared for conference on “International Transformations and Hemispheric Restructuring: New Patterns of US-Southern Cone Relations, The Cases of MERCOSUR and Chile;” North-South Center, Coral Gables (FL), 7-8 December.Google Scholar
Perez Otermin, J. (1993) “Principios Esenciales de un Ordenamiento Juridico Comunitario” (Boletim de Integração Latino-Americana). Brasilia, Brasil: Ministerio das Relaçôes Exteriores.Google Scholar
Powell, R. (1991) “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 80, 4 (Winter): 1151–1169.Google Scholar
Quijano, J. (1992) “Los casosde Uruguay y Paraguay, dos economías del Mercosur.” Paper prepared for conference on “International Transformations and Hemispheric Restructuring: New Patterns of US-Southern Cone Relations, The Cases of MERCOSUR and Chile;” North-South Center, Coral Gables (FL), 7-8 December.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, G. (1991) “Un informe crítico a 30 años de integración en America Latina.” Nueva Sociedad 113 (mayo-junio): 60–65.Google Scholar
Snidal, D. (1991) “Relative Gains and International Cooperation.” American Political Science Review 85, 4 (Fall): 1303–1320.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1993) “The Politics of Integration: Concepts and Themes,” in Smith, Peter H. (ed.) The Challenge of Integration: Europe and the Americas. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami North-South Center.Google Scholar
Tucker, J. (1991) “Partners and Rivals: A Model of International Collaboration in Advanced Technology.” International Organizations 45 (Spring): 83–120 Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (1991) World Economic Survey 1991/92: A Reader. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
van Klaveren, A. (1993) “Why Integration Now? Options for Latin America” in Smith, Peter H. (ed.) The Challenge of Integration: Europe and the Americas. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami North-South Center.Google Scholar
Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Whiting, V. Jr. (1993) “The Dynamics of Regionalization: Road Map to an Open Future?” in Smith, Peter H. (ed.) The Challenge of Integration: Europe and the Americas. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami North-South Center.Google Scholar