Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:43:48.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commodification, vulnerability, risk: gendered social policy developments in the United States, 1980–2018

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Marie Laperrière ,
Ann Shola Orloff  and
Jane Pryma
Marie Laperrière
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
Ann Shola Orloff*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
Jane Pryma
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA
*
CONTACT Ann Shola Orloff a-orloff@northwestern.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last few decades, the position of women vis-à-vis the welfare state has changed dramatically. Welfare states have adapted to women's increased labour force participation and to the “new social risks” that characterize postindustrial societies. In this paper, we examine gendered policy developments in the US, focusing on conceptions of vulnerability that inform policies meant to mitigate gendered social risks. Focusing on three policy areas: parental leave, domestic violence and disability, we show that policies increasingly target women's integration into the workforce and self-regulation as strategies to mitigate gendered social risk. We also discuss how these policies rely on individual interventions implemented by what we call punitive therapy practitioners, who encourage women's workforce participation and psychological self-regulation. Finally, we argue that enduring gendered conceptions of vulnerability have shaped the specific designs of policies that emerged in the 1960s–1970s, intensified through the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s, and persist today.

Keywords

Gendervulnerabilitycommodificationmothers' employment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 35 , Issue 1: SI: Recent Social Policy in Canada and the United States , February 2019 , pp. 41 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors are equal co-authors and the names are in alphabetical order.

References

Bagenstos, S. R. (2003a). The Americans with disabilities Act as welfare reform. William and Mary Law Review, 44, 921–1027.Google Scholar
Bagenstos, S. R. (2003b). Comparative disability employment Law from an American perspective. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 24(-), 649–668.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. (2012). Understanding the social model of disability: past, present and future. In Watson, N., Roulstone, A., & Thomas, C. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 12–29). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bazelon, L. (2018). I'm a Democrat and a Feminist. And I Support Betsy DeVos's Title IX Reforms. The New York Times (December 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Béland, D., & Waddan, A. (2012). The politics of policy Change: Welfare, Medicare, and social Security reform in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bevacqua, M. (2000). Rape on the public agenda: Feminism and the politics of sexual assault. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2006). New social risks and the politics of post-industrial social policies. In Armingeon, K., & Bonoli, G. (Eds.), The politics of post-Industrial welfare states: Adapting post-war social policies to new social risks (pp. 3–26). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bridges, K. (2011). Reproducing Race: An ethnography of Pregnancy as a Site of Racialization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brush, L. D. (2011). Poverty, battered women, and work in U.S. Public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Persons with a Disability: Labor Force Characteristics News Release. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/disabl.htmGoogle Scholar
Chancer, L. S. (2005). High-Profile Crimes: When legal cases become social causes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, M. (2012). The war on welfare: Family, poverty, and politics in modern America. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, E. S. (2017). Reconciling equal treatment with Respect for Individuality. In Morgan, K. J. & Orloff, A. S. (Eds.), The many Hands of the state: Theorizing political Authority and social control (pp. 35–57). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, D. K. (2001). Crime control and feminist Law reform in domestic violence Law: A Critical Review. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4, 801–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. (2013). Up against a Wall: Rape reform and the failure of Success. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, R. (2014). Why feminist theory Matters for feminist practice: The case of rape response. Politics & Gender, 10(2), 280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M., & Ferragina, E. (2017). Family policy in high-income countries: Five decades of development. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(3), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, S. (2014). Dependence, care, and vulnerability. In Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (Eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and feminist Philosophy (pp. 181–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making Ends meet: How single mothers Survive welfare and Low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. (2016). Saving children, Controlling families: Punishment, Redistribution, and child protection. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, D. T. (1989). Poor support: Poverty in the American family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to women's New roles. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Federal Partners Committee on Women and Trauma. (2013). Women and Trauma (Trauma Informed Approaches: Federal Activities and Initiatives). Retrieved from https://www.nasmhpd.org/sites/default/files/2013FederalPartnersReportFinal.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). “Dependency” Demystified: Inscriptions of Power in a Keyword of the welfare state. Social Politics, 1(1), 4–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. (2016, September 13, 2016). Donald Trump's Maternity Leave Proposal Gives Conservatives In Congress Some Pause. Huffington Post.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social Order in Contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, M. (1995). Racial Attitudes and opposition to welfare. Journal of Politics, 57, 994–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans Hate welfare: Race, Media, and the politics of Antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, L. (1994). Pitied but Not Entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2009). Institutions that support gender equality in parenthood and employment. In Gornick, J. C. & Meyers, M. K. (Eds.), Gender equality: Transforming family divisions of labor (pp. 3–66). London; New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, M. (2006). The battered-women's Movement and the development of penal policy The Prison and the Gallows: The politics of Mass incarceration in America (pp. 139-164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2010). The Road to Somewhere: Why health reform Happened: Or Why political Scientists Who Write about public policy Shouldn't Assume they know How to Shape It. Perspectives on Politics, 8(3), 861–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, L. A. (2010). Offending women: Power, Punishment, and the regulation of Desire. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haskins, R. (2006). Work over welfare: The Inside Story of the 1996 welfare reform Law. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions Press.Google Scholar
Health Resources and Services Administration. (2017). Affordable Care Act Expands Prevention Coverage for Women's Health and Well-Being. HRSA.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2009). State of our unions: Marriage Promotion and the contested Power of Heterosexuality. Gender & Society, 23(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, C. (1997). The Hidden welfare state: Tax Expenditures and social policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2017). States and gender justice. In Morgan, K. J., & Orloff, A. (Eds.), The many Hands of the state: Theorizing political Authority and social control (pp. 158–177). New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2006). Combating old and new social risks. In Armingeon, K., & Bonoli, G. (Eds.), The politics of post-Industrial welfare states (pp. 143–168). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Jenkins, P. (1998). Moral Panic: Changing Concepts of the child Molester in Modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2009). Lost in Translation: The social Investment perspective and gender equality. Social Politics, 16(4), 446–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, L., Miller, S. M., & Hopper, J. S. (2017). The social safety Net for disabled Persons. In Baker, D. L. (Ed.), Disability and U.S. Politics: Participation, policy, and controversy (Vol. 2, pp. 57–88). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kessler-Harris, A. (2003). In Pursuit of equity: Women, Men, and the Quest for economic Citizenship in 20th-Century America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, S. M. (2018, February 4). Ivanka, Rubio find a new project: Paid family leave. Politico.Google Scholar
King, D., & Wickham-Jones, M. (1999). From Clinton to Blair: The Democratic (party) origins of welfare to work. The Political Quaterly, 70(1), 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara-Millan, A. (2017). States as a series of people exchanges. In Morgan, K., & Orloff, A. S. (Eds.), The many Hands of the state: Theorizing political Authority and social control (pp. 81–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, R. C. (2001). Shifting the Color line: Race and the American welfare state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacLean, N. (1999). The hidden history of affirmative action: Working women's struggles in the 1970s and the gender of class. Feminist Studies, 25(1), 42–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, N. (2006). Freedom Is Not enough: The Opening of the American workplace. Cambridge, New York, MA: Harvard University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.Google ScholarPubMed
Maier, S. (2008). Are rape crisis Centers feminist organizations? Feminist Criminology, 3(2), 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorkel, J. A. (2013). Breaking women: Gender, Race, and the New politics of Imprisonment. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
McKim, A. (2008). “Getting Gut-level”: Punishment, gender, and therapeutic governance. Gender & Society, 22(3), 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezey, S. G. (1988). No longer disabled: The federal Courts and the politics of social Security disability. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Mink, G. (1998). Welfare's End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mittelstadt, J. (2005). From welfare to Workfare: The Unintended consequences of liberal reform, 1945-1965. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (eds.). (2012). Towards a social Investment welfare state?: Ideas, policies and Challenges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. J. (2001). A child of the Sixties: The Great society, the New right, and the politics of child care. Journal of Policy History, 13(2), 215–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. J., & Orloff, A. S. (2017). The many Hands of the state: Theorizing political Authority and social control. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudge, S. L. (2008). The state of the Art: What is Neo-Liberalims? Socio-Economic Review, 6, 703–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudge, S. L. (2018). Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadel, M., Wamhoff, S., & Wiseman, M. (2003/2004). Disability, welfare reform, and Supplemental Security income. Social Security Bulletin, 65(3).Google Scholar
Naples, N. (1997). The “new consensus” on the gendered “social contract”: The 1987-1988 U.S. Congressional Hearings on welfare reform. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 22(4), 907–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naples, N. (1998). Grassroots Warriors: Activist Mothering, community work, and the War on poverty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noble, C. (1997). Welfare As We Knew It: A political history of the American welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. S., Orloff, A. S., & Shaver, S. (1999). States, Markets, families: Gender, Liberalism, and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and the United States. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A. S. (2002). Explaining US welfare reform: Power, gender, race and the US policy legacy. Critical Social Policy, 22(1), 96–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A. S. (2006). From Maternalism to ‘employment for all': State policies to promote women's employment across the Affluent democracies. In Levy, J. D. (Ed.), The state after Statism: New state activities in the Era of Globalization and Liberalization (pp. 230–268). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. S. (2009). Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An Unfinished agenda. Sociological Theory, 27(3), 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A. S. (2017). Gendered states made and Remade: Gendered Labor policies in the United States and Sweden, 1960-2010. In Morgan, K. J., & Orloff, A. (Eds.), The many Hands of the state: Theorizing political Authority and social control (pp. 131–157). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A. S., & Palier, B. (2009). The Power of gender Perspectives: Feminist influence on policy Paradigms, social Science, and social politics. Social Politics, 16(4), 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedriana, N. (2006). From Protective to equal treatment: Legal Framing Processes and transformation of the women's Movement in the 1960s. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1718–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedriana, N., & Stryker, R. (1997). Political culture wars 1960s Style: Equal employment Opportunity-affirmative action Law and the Philadelphia plan. American Journal of Sociology, 103(3), 633–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedriana, N., & Stryker, R. (2004). The Strength of a Weak agency: Enforcement of Title VII of the 1964 civil rights Act and the expansion of state Capacity, 1965-1971. American Journal of Sociology, 110(3), 709–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryma, J. (2017). “Even my sister says I'm acting like a crazy to get a check”: Race, gender, and moral boundary-work in women's claims of disabling chronic pain. Social Science & Medicine, 181, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadagno, J. (2014). Right-wing conspiracy? Socialist plot? The origins of the patient protection and Affordable care Act. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 39(1), 35–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramanathan, K. (2017). From civil rights to social policy: The political development of family and medical leave policies in the United States, 1964-1993. Paper presented at the social Science history Association Conference, Montreal.Google Scholar
Reese, E. (2005). Backlash against welfare mothers: Past and present. Thousand Oaks, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., & Curtis, M. A. (2005). Tanf sanctioning and Hardship. Social Service Review, 79(2), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, C. (2018). The mobilization of Title IX across U.S. Colleges and universities, 1994-2014. Social Problems.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1996). Gender, equality, and welfare states. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. M. (2000). Battered women and feminist Lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Houser, L. (2009). Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of welfare reform. American Sociological Review, 74, 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. W. (1988). Deconstructing equality-versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist theory for Feminism. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, M. (2011). Reviled mothers: Custody Modification cases Involving domestic violence. Indiana Law Journal, 86(4), 1587–1615.Google Scholar
Sholar, M. A. (2016). The history of family leave policies in the United States. Retrieved from http://tah.oah.org/november-2016/the-history-of-family-leave-policies-in-the-united-states/Google Scholar
Skrentny, J. (2009). The minority rights revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steensland, B. (2006). Cultural Categories and the American welfare state: The case of Guaranteed income policy. American Journal of Sociology, 111(5), 1273–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strebeigh, F. (2008). Ladies’ man. New Republic, 239(5), 16–18.Google Scholar
Sweet, P. L. (2015). Chronic victims, Risky women: Domestic violence Advocacy and the medicalization of abuse. Signs, 41(1), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wailoo, K. (2014). Pain: A political history. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wailoo, K. (2017). Pain with a “Psychogenic Overlay”: The Gendered Politics of Experience and Disability in US Society. Paper presented at the Gender and Pain in Modern History, Birkbeck, University of London. https://backdoorbroadcasting.net/2017/03/keith-wailoo-pain-with-a-psychogenic-overlay-the-gendered-politics-of-experience-and-disability-in-us-society/Google Scholar
Walker, L. E. A. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Watkins-Hayes, C. (2009). The New welfare bureaucrats - Entanglements of Race, Class and policy reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittier, N. (2016). Carceral and Intersectional Feminism in Congress: The violence against women Act, discourse, and policy. Gender & Society, 30(5), 791–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolbrecht, C. (2000). The politics of women's rights: Parties, positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar