Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:56:06.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Socio-legal status and experiences of forced labour among asylum seekers and refugees in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Peter Dwyer ,
Stuart Hodkinson Open the ORCID record for Stuart Hodkinson [Opens in a new window] ,
Hannah Lewis  and
Louise Waite
Peter Dwyer*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, UK
Stuart Hodkinson
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Hannah Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Louise Waite
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: peter.dwyer@york.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Socio-legal status determines the differential rights to residence, work and social welfare that accrue to migrants depending on their particular immigration status. This paper presents analysis of original empirical data generated in qualitative interviews with migrants who had both made a claim for asylum and experienced conditions of forced labour in the UK. Following an outline of the divergent socio-legal statuses assigned to individual migrants within the asylum system, early discussions in the paper offer a summary of key aspects and indicators of forced labour. Subsequent sections highlight the significance of socio-legal status in constructing such migrants as inherently vulnerable to severe exploitation. It is concluded that immigration policy and, more particularly, the differential socio-legal statuses that it structures at various stages of the asylum process, helps to create the conditions in which severe exploitation and forced labour are likely to flourish among asylum seekers and refugees in the UK.

Keywords

forced laboursocio-legal statusasylum seekersrefugees
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , October 2016 , pp. 182 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International UK. (2006). Down and out in London: The road to destitution for rejected asylum seekers. London: Author.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (2007). Battles in time: The relation between global and labour mobilities, COMPAS. (Working Paper no. 55). University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Anderson, B., & Rogaly, B. (2005). Forced labour and migration to the UK. London: Trades Union Congress.Google Scholar
van den Anker, C. (2009). Rights and responsibilities in trafficking for forced labour: Migration regimes, labour law and welfare states. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues [Online], 1. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2009/issue1/vandenanker1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bloch, A. (2002). Refugees’ opportunities and barriers in employment and training (DWP research report No 179). Leeds: Department for Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
Bloch, A. (2004). Making it work, refugee employment in the UK. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Bloch, A. (2008). Refugees in the UK labour market: The conflict between economic integration and policy-led labour market restriction. Journal of Social Policy, 37(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Red Cross. (2010). Not gone, but forgotten. The urgent need for a more humane asylum system. London: Author.Google Scholar
Burnett, J., & Whyte, D. (2010). The wages of fear: Risk, safety and undocumented work. Leeds: PAFRAS and the University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Craig, G. (2007). Cunning, unprincipled, loathsome: The racist tail wags the welfare dog. Journal of Social Policy, 36(4), 605–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, H., Hemmings, J., & Price, N. (2011). Coping with destitution. Survival and livelihood strategies of refused asylum seekers living in the UK. Swansea: Swansea University and Oxfam.Google Scholar
Düvell, F., & Jordan, B. (2002). Immigration, asylum and welfare: The European context. Critical Social Policy, 22(3), 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, P. (2005). Governance, forced migration and welfare. Social Policy and Administration, 39(6), 622–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, P. (2009). Integration? The perceptions and experiences of refugees in Yorkshire and the Humber. Leeds: Yorkshire and Humber Regional Migration Partnership.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P., & Brown, D. (2005). Meeting basic needs? Forced migrants and welfare. Social Policy and Society, 4(4), 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, P., Lewis, H., Scullion, L., & Waite, L. (2011). Immigration policy and forced labour: Status matters? York: Report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/forced-labour-immigration-status-full_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Geddes, A., Craig, G., Scott, S., Ackers, L., Robinson, O., & Scullion, D. (2013). Forced labour in the UK. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Goldring, L., & Landolt, P. (2011). Caught in the work-citizenship matrix: The lasting effects of precarious legal status on work for Toronto immigrants. Globalization, 8(3), 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordolan, L., & Lalani, M. (2009). Care and immigration: Migrant care workers in private households. London: Kalayaan and Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS).Google Scholar
Gubbay, J. (1999). The European Union role in the formation and, legitimation and implementation of migration policy. In Dale, G. & Cole, M. (Eds.), The European Union and migrant labour (pp. 23–35). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Home Office. (2015). Immigration directorate instruction family migration: Appendix FM section 1.7, appendix armed forces, financial requirement. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/469692/Appendix_FM_1_7_Financial_Requirement_August_2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hurstfield, J., Pearson, R., Hooker, H., Ritchie, H., & Sinclair, A. (2004). Employing refugees: Some organisations’ experience. London: Institute for Employment Studies.Google Scholar
ILO. (1930). C029 – forced labour convention. Geneva: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C029Google Scholar
ILO. (2005). Human trafficking and forced labour exploitation. Guidelines for legislation and law enforcement. Geneva: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@declaration/documents/publication/wcms_081999.pdfGoogle Scholar
ILO. (2012). 11 indicators of forced labour. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar
Kagan, C., Lo, S., Mok, L., Lawthom, R., Sham, S., Greenwood, M., & Baines, S. (2011). Experiences of forced labour among Chinese migrant workers. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Katungi, D., Neale, E., & Barbour, A. (2006). People in low-paid informal work: “Need not greed”. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Lerche, J. (2007). A global alliance against forced labour? Unfree labour, neo-liberal globalization and the international labour organization. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(4), 425–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, H. (2007). Destitution in leeds: The experiences of people seeking asylum and supporting agencies. York: Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.Google Scholar
Lewis, H. (2009). Still destitute: A worsening problem for refused asylum seekers. York: Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.Google Scholar
Lewis, H., Dwyer, P., Hodkinson, S., & Waite, L. (2013). Research report. Precarious lives, experiences of forced labour among refugees and asylum seekers in England. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Lewis, H., Dwyer, P., Hodkinson, S., & Waite, L. (2014). Precarious lives: Forced labour, exploitation and asylum. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, R., & Forde, R. (2009). The rhetoric of the “good worker” versus the realities of employers’ use and experiences of migrant workers. Work, Employment and Society, 23(1), 142–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McIntyre, P., & Mogire, E. (2012). Between a rock and a hard place: The dilemma facing refused asylum seekers. London: Refugee Council.Google Scholar
McKay, S., Jefferys, S., Paraksevopoulou, A., & Keles, J. (2012). Study on precarious work and social rights. London: Working Lives Research Institute London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
Migration Work/MRN. (2009). Irregular migrants: The urgent need for a new approach. London: Migrants’ Rights Network.Google Scholar
Morris, L. (2002). Britain's asylum and immigration regime: The shifting contours of rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(3), 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell Davidson, J. (2013). Troubling freedom: Migration, debt, and modern slavery. Migration Studies, 10(2), 244–261.Google Scholar
O'Neill, J. (2011). Varieties of unfreedom. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. (2011). Unfree labour and adverse incorporation in global production networks: Comparative perspectives on Brazil and India, Chronic Poverty Research Centre. (Working Paper No. 176). University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Refugee Action. (2006). The destitution trap: Research into destitution among refused asylum seekers in the UK. London: Author.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L., & O'Connor, W. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 219–262). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shelly, T. (2007). Exploted: Migrant labour in the new global economy. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Shutes, I. (2011). Welfare-to-work and the responsiveness of employment providers to the needs of refugees. Journal of Social Policy, 40(3), 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigona, N. (2012). “I have too much baggage”: The impacts of legal status on the social worlds of irregular migrants. Social Anthropology, 20(1), 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skřivánková, K. (2006). Trafficking for forced labour. UK country report. London: Anti-Slavery International.Google Scholar
Skřivánková, K. (2010). Between decent work and forced labour: Examining the continuum of exploitation. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Smart, K. (2009). The second destitution tally. An indication of the extent of destitution among asylum seekers, refused asylum seekers and refugees. The Asylum Support Programme Inter-Agency Partnership.Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Stewart, E., and Mulvey, G. (2014). Seeking safety beyond refuge: The impact of immigration and citizenship policy upon refugees in the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(7), 1023–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, R. (2010). Hope costs nothing: The lives of undocumented migrants in the UK. London: Migrants Resource Centre and Barrow Cadbury Trust.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society. (Working Paper No. 25). Oxford: COMPAS.Google Scholar
Williams, R., & Kaye, M. (2010). At the end of the line: Restoring the integrity of the UK's asylum system. Still Human Still Here.Google Scholar