Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:48:20.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of severely and profoundly hearing impaired adults attending an audiology clinic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

L. G. McClymont  and
G. G. Browning
L. G. McClymont
Affiliation:
Glasgow
G. G. Browning*
Affiliation:
Glasgow
*
Professor George G. Browning, Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the fact that around 12 per cent of adult patients attending an audiology department will be severely hearing impaired (pure tone averages of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz of 70 dB HL or worse in the better hearing ear), their clinical and audiometric characteristics have not been well documented.

These characteristics were collected prospectively in 132 adult patients attending a Severe Impairment Clinic, set up to manage their specific problems. The inability to provide sufficient masking makes audiometric assessment of the severity of the impairment uncertain in the poorer hearing ear in 52 per cent of these patients. In addition, the limited bone conduction output makes it almost invariably impossible to assess the masked bone conduction thresholds and hence the air-bone gap in the poorer ear. Hence, accurate characterization is only practical of the better hearing ear in such patients.

In 67 per cent of the better hearing ears, there was a mixed hearing impairment, the air-bone gap being 20 dB or greater. The aetiology of the conductive component was almost equally otosclerosis and chronic otitis media. In only 19 per cent was the impairment of a pure sensorineural type, broken down as 6 per cent congenitally acquired, 5 per cent due to meningitis and 9 per cent being adult in onset. In the remaining 14 per cent of patients the type of impairment could not be classified as the bone conductive thresholds were off scale.

Having had experience of managing these patients at a special clinic and knowing the workload involved, it is argued that consideration be given to setting up such clinics in most departments.

Keywords

DeafnessHearing lossHearing aid
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 105 , Issue 7 , July 1991 , pp. 534 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

British Society of Audiology (1981) Recommended procedures for pure-tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. British Journal of Audiology, 15: 203–216.Google Scholar
British Society of Audiology (1985) Recommended procedures for pure-tone bone conduction audiometry without masksing using a manually operated instrument. British Journal of Audiology, 19: 212–282.Google Scholar
British Society of Audiology (1986) Recommendations for masking in pure-tone threshold audiometry. British Journal of Audiology, 20: 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, G. A., Browning, G. G., Gatehouse, S. (1988) Benefit from binaural hearing aids in individuals with a severe hearing impairment. British Journal of Audiology, 22: 273–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, M., Browning, G. G. (1990) The role of surgery in the adult, severely hearing impaired population. In preparation for submission to journal of Laryngology and Otology.Google Scholar
McClymont, L. G. (1990) MD Thesis. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Davis, A. C. (1989) The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. International Journal of Epidemiology, 18(4): 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed