Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:34:57.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional vocal results after CO2 laser endoscopic surgery for glottic tumours

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2007

S Motta ,
U Cesari ,
M Mesolella  and
G Motta
S Motta*
Affiliation:
Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Preventive Medical Sciences, University ‘Federico II’ of Naples, Italy
U Cesari
Affiliation:
Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Preventive Medical Sciences, University ‘Federico II’ of Naples, Italy
M Mesolella
Affiliation:
Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Preventive Medical Sciences, University ‘Federico II’ of Naples, Italy
G Motta
Affiliation:
Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Preventive Medical Sciences, University ‘Federico II’ of Naples, Italy
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Sergio Motta, Via Caravaggio 119, Cap 80126, Naples, Italy. E-mail: sermotta@yahoo.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Vocal results after endoscopic cordectomy have not yet been well defined. The aim of this study was to assess the vocal function of patients who had undergone CO2 laser cordectomy.

Design:

Retrospective, observational and control group study, conducted in a tertiary care medical department.

Methods:

One hundred and thirty-five male patients (age range 36–83 years) underwent different types of endoscopic cordectomy. Forty age-matched, euphonic male subjects were selected as controls. Patients were classified according to the main site of the phonatory neo-glottis. Outcome measures were maximum phonation time, vocal intensity and harmonic/noise ratio. Mann–Whitney and rank Spearman tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results:

Findings indicated statistically significant differences for all parameters, comparing patients and controls (p<0.001), and a direct positive relation between type of functional compensation and outcome measures in the study patients (p<0.001).

Conclusions:

The results indicate that functional compensation and outcome measures were related, and that no functional compensation enabled the study patients to achieve a voice quality comparable with that of controls.

Keywords

Larynx NeoplasmsLaser SurgeryVoice
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 122 , Issue 9 , September 2008 , pp. 948 - 951
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Eckel, HE, Thumfart, WF. Laser surgery for the treatment of larynx carcinomas: indications, techniques and preliminary results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:113–18Google Scholar
2 Moreau, PR. Treatment of laryngeal carcinomas by laser endoscopy microsurgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1000–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Motta, G, Esposito, E, Motta, S, Tartaro, G, Testa, D. CO2 laser surgery in the treatment of glottic cancer. Head Neck 2005;27:566–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Ossoff, RH, Sisson, GA, Shapshay, SM. Endoscopic management of selected early vocal cord carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985;94:560–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Pia, F, Gonella, ML, Boggero, R, Ponzo, S, Giordano, C. Vocal function after cordectomy (traditional surgical treatment vs CO2 laser): a comparative objective-instrumental evaluation [in Italian]. Acta Otorhinol Ital 1994;14:329–38Google ScholarPubMed
6 Remacle, M, Lawson, G, Jamart, J, Minet, M, Watelet, JB, Delos, M. CO2 laser in the diagnosis and treatment of early cancer of the vocal fold. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997;254:169–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Steiner, W. Results of curative laser microsurgery of laryngeal carcinomas. Am J Otolaryngol 1993;14:116–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Strong, MS, Jako, GJ. Laser surgery in the larynx: early clinical experience with continuous CO2 laser. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1972;81:791–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Remacle, M, Eckel, HE, Antonelli, A, Brasnu, D, Chevalier, D, Friedrich, G et al. Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000;257:227–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Dejonekere, PH, Bradley, P, Clemente, P. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;258:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 McGuirt, WF, Blalock, D, Koufman, JA, Feehs, RS. Voice analysis of patients with endoscopically treated early laryngeal carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:142–6Google Scholar
12 Sittel, C, Heckel, HE, Heschenburg, C. Phonatory results after laser surgery for glottic carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;119:418–24Google Scholar
13 Almadori, G, Ottaviani, F, D'Alatri, L, Carriero, E, Modica, V, Paludetti, G. Functional results after cordectomy in laryngeal fissure and in microlaryngoscopy with CO2 laser [in Italian]. Acta Otorhinol Ital 1998;18:16–22Google ScholarPubMed
14 Peretti, G, Piazza, C, Balzanelli, C, Mensi, MC, Rossigni, M, Antonelli, AR. Preoperative and postoperative voice in Tis-T1 glottic cancer treated by endoscopic cordectomy: an additional issue for patient counselling. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003;112:759–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar