Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:36:29.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hazardous complications of animate foreign bodies in otology practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2015

K Sikka*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
R Agrawal
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
K Devraja
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
J V Lodha
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
A Thakar
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Kapil Sikka, Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, Room 4057, Teaching Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110 029, India E-mail: kapil_sikka@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background:

Animate foreign bodies in the ear are frequent occurrences in otology practice. Such foreign bodies may lead to hazardous complications.

Method:

This paper describes a retrospective study of six patients with a recent history of an insect in the ear who presented with various complications following intervention received elsewhere.

Results:

An insect was retrieved from the external auditory canal in four cases and from the antrum in two cases. The patients presented with progressive otological complications: two patients who presented with orbital apex syndrome and cavernous sinus thrombosis succumbed to the disease; three patients suffered sensorineural hearing loss; and two patients had persistent facial palsy. One patient with sigmoid sinus thrombosis, who presented early, experienced complete recovery.

Conclusion:

Insects in the ear can lead to hazardous complications. Animate foreign bodies should preferably be managed by a trained otologist, even in an emergency setting. Patients with delayed presentation and complications have a guarded prognosis.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Das, SK. Aetiological evaluation of foreign bodies in the ear and nose. J Laryngol Otol 1984;98:989–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Thompson, SK, Wein, RO, Dutcher, PO. External auditory canal foreign body removal: management practices and outcomes. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1912–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Bressler, K, Shelton, C. Ear foreign-body removal: a review of 98 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 1993;103:367–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Fornazieri, MA, Cutolo, D, Moreira, JH, Navarro Pde, L, Takemoto, LE, Hesbiki, RE et al. Foreign-body in external auditory meatus: evaluation of 462 cases. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;14:45–9Google Scholar
5Schulze, SL, Kerschner, J, Beste, D. Pediatric external auditory canal foreign bodies: a review of 698 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;127:73–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Ugwu, GI, Okolugbo, NE. Otogenic tetanus: case series. West Afr J Med 2012;31:277–9Google ScholarPubMed
7David, BK. Insect sting anaphylaxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2007;27:261–7Google Scholar
8Barnard, JH. Studies of 400 Hymenoptera sting deaths in United States. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1973;52:259–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Simons, FE, Peng, Z. Skeeter syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104:705–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Dance, D, Riley, M, Ludemann, JP. Removal of ear canal foreign bodies in children: what can go wrong and when to refer. BCMJ 2009;51:20–4Google Scholar