Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:37:41.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Management of ENT emergencies during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2021

J Stansfield*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
S Dobbs
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
R Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
K Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
S Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
K Okour
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
S Agrawal
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
M S Miah
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Joseph Stansfield, Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Fairfield General Hospital, Bury, UK E-mail: j.p.stansfield@doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 imposed dramatic changes on ENT service delivery. Pre-pandemic, such changes would have been considered potentially unsafe. This study outlines the impact of lockdown on the incidence and management of ENT emergencies at a large UK centre.

Methods

After modification of pre-pandemic guidelines, ENT emergency referrals data during the UK lockdown were prospectively captured. A comparative analysis was performed with retrospective data from a corresponding period in 2019.

Results

An overall reduction (p < 0.001) in emergency referrals (n = 119) and admissions (n = 18) occurred during the lockdown period compared to the 2019 period (432 referrals and 290 admissions). Specifically, there were reduced admission rates for epistaxis (p < 0.0001) and tonsillar infection (p < 0.005) in the lockdown period. During lockdown, 90 per cent of patients requiring non-dissolvable nasal packing were managed as out-patients.

Conclusions

Coronavirus disease 2019 compelled modifications to pre-pandemic ENT guidelines. The enforced changes to emergency care appear to be safe and successfully adopted. Arguably, the measures have both economic and patient-related implications post-coronavirus disease 2019 and during future similar pandemics and lockdowns.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr J Stansfield takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Zhou, P, Yang, XL, Wang, XG, Hu, B, Zhang, L, Zhang, W et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020;579:270–310.1038/s41586-020-2012-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. Coronavirus Resource Centre. In: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/ [1 September 2020]Google Scholar
Bann, DV, Patel, VA, Saddi, R, Gniady, JP, Goyal, N, McGinn, J et al. Impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on otolaryngologic surgery: brief commentary. Head Neck 2020;42:1227–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zou, L, Roun, F, Huang, M, Liang, L, Huang, H, Yu, J et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1177–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, JY, Wong, EW, Lam, W. Practical aspects of otolaryngologic clinical services during the 2019 novel coronavirus epidemic: an experience in Hong Kong. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;146:519–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ENT UK. Guidelines for changes in ENT during COVID-19 pandemic. In: https://www.entuk.org/entuk-guidelines-changes-ent-during-covid-19-pandemic [1 September 2020]Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for IPC precaution recommendations. In: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331601/WHO-2019-nCoV-Sci_Brief-Transmission_modes-2020.1-eng.pdf [1 September 2020]Google Scholar
Ahmed, K, Hayat, S, Dasgupta, P. Global challenges to urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. BJU Int 2020;125:E56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampton, M, Clark, M, Baxter, I, Stevens, R, Flatt, E, Murray, J et al. The effects of a UK lockdown on orthopaedic trauma admissions and surgical cases. Bone Jt Open 2020;1:137–4310.1302/2633-1462.15.BJO-2020-0028.R1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gov.UK. Emergency department: weekly bulletins for 2019. In: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emergency-department-weekly-bulletins-for-2019 [1 September 2020]Google Scholar
Gov.UK. Emergency department: weekly bulletins for 2020. In: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/emergency-department-weekly-bulletins-for-2020 [1 September 2020]Google Scholar
Womack, JP, Kropa, J, Stabile, MJ. Epistaxis: outpatient management. Am Fam Physician 2020;98:240–5Google Scholar
Goljo, E, Dang, R, Iloreta, AM, Govindaraj, S. Cost of management in epistaxis admission: impact of patient and hospital characteristics. Laryngoscope 2020;125:2642–710.1002/lary.25374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, PW, Strachan, DR, Firth, AL. Intermittent self-nasal packing for intractable epistaxis in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:827–810.1258/002221503770716304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehanna, HM, Al-Bahnaswi, L, White, A. National audit of the management of peritonsillar abscess. Postgrad Med J 2020;78:545–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, SM, Hussain, A, Mughal, S, Khan, IZ, Khan, IA. Peritonsillar cellulitis and quinsy, clinical presentation and management. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal 2020;59:298303Google Scholar
ENT UK. COVID-19 Tonsillitis & Quinsy Guidelines. In: https://www.entuk.org/entuk-guidelines-changes-ent-during-covid-19-pandemic [1 September 2020]Google Scholar
Al-Yaghchi, C, Cruise, A, Kapoor, K, Singh, A, Harcourt, J. Out-patient management of patients with a peritonsillar abscess. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:52–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sichel, JY, Dano, I, Hocwald, E, Biron, A, Eliashar, R. Nonsurgical management of parapharyngeal space infections: a prospective study. Laryngoscope 2002;112:906–1010.1097/00005537-200205000-00023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, EL, Powell, J, Samuel, JR, Wilson, JA. A review of the pathogenesis of adult peritonsillar abscess: time for a re-evaluation. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013;68:1941–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garas, G, Ifeacho, S, Cetto, R, Arora, A, Tolley, N. Prospective audit on the outpatient management of patients with a peritonsillar abscess: closing the loop: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 2011;36:174–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewnard, JA, Lo, NC. Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:631–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brook, I. Microbiology and management of peritonsillar, retropharyngeal, and parapharyngeal abscesses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1545–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Passy, V. Pathogenesis of peritonsillar abscess. Laryngoscope 1994;104:185–90Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, M, Ellis, ME. Infectious Diseases of the Respiratory Tract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Emergency Medicine. RCEM – seriously ill or injured patients may be avoiding Emergency Departments due to Covid-19 fears. In: https://www.rcem.ac.uk/RCEM/News/News_2020/RCEM___seriously_ill_or_injured_patients_may_be_avoiding_Emergency_Departments_due_to_Covid-19_fears.aspx [1 September 2020]Google Scholar
Ting, DS, Carin, L, Dzau, V, Wong, TY. Digital technology and COVID-19. Nat Med 2020;26:459–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luciani, LG, Mattevi, D, Cai, T, Giutsi, G, Proietti, S, Malossini, G. Teleurology in the time of Covid-19 pandemic: here to stay? Urology 2020;140:4610.1016/j.urology.2020.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, P. Virtual health care in the era of COVID-19. Lancet 2020;395:1180–1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Surgeons of England. COVID-19: Good Practice for Surgeons and Surgical Teams. In: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/standards-and-guidance/good-practice-guides/coronavirus/covid-19-good-practice-for-surgeons-and-surgical-teams/ [1 September 2020]Google Scholar
Al-Jabir, A, Kerwan, A, Nicola, M, Alsafi, Z, Khan, M, Sohrabi, C et al. Impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on surgical practice. Int J Surg 2020;79:168–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauhan, V, Galwankar, S, Arquilla, B, Garg, M, Somma, S, El-Menyar, A et al. Novel coronavirus (COVID 19): leveraging telemedicine to optimize care while minimizing exposures and viral transmission. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2020;13:20–4Google ScholarPubMed