Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:12:57.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Raised ABR threshold after suction aspiration of glue from the middle ear: three case studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

I. W. S. Mair
I. W. S. Mair
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ullevaal University Hospital, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 110 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 106 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

References

Burkard, R., Hecox, K. (1983) The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74: 1214–1223.Google Scholar
Eggermont, J. J., Don, M. (1980) Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-class noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 68: 1671–1675.Google Scholar
Fjermedal, O., Laukli, E. (1989) Low-level 0.5 and 1 kHz auditory brainstem responses: a search for the lowfrequency point in the two-point ABR audiogram. Scandinavian Audiology 18: 177–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mair, I. W. S., Fjermedal, O., Laukli, E. (1989) Air conduction thresholds and secretory otitis media: a conventional and extra-high frequency audiometric comparison. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 98: 767–771.Google Scholar
Mason, J. D. T., Mason, S. M., Gibbin, K. P. (1995) Raised ABR threshold after suction aspiration of glue from the middle ear: three case studies. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 109: 726–728.Google Scholar