Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:56:51.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land Reform, Historical Consciousness and Indigenous Activism in Late Twentieth-Century Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2017

SERGIO MIGUEL HUARCAYA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of the emergence of the Ecuadorian indigenous movement, which burst onto the national political scene in 1990, have not paid enough attention to indigenous historical consciousness. Using historical and ethnographic evidence, this study examines the emergence of historical consciousness among indigenous peasants involved in the land struggle for the Quinchuquí hacienda, in Otavalo, Ecuador. The research demonstrates that it was only during the struggle for the land that the peasants became aware of the colonial dispossession of indigenous lands. Legitimating their politics in terms of history, they articulated a political identity that increasingly emphasised ethnicity over class.

Spanish abstract

Los estudios del surgimiento del movimiento indígena ecuatoriano, que irrumpió en la política nacional en 1990, no han prestado suficiente atención a la conciencia histórica indígena. Utilizando evidencia histórica y etnográfica, este estudio examina el desarrollo de una conciencia histórica en campesinos indígenas involucrados en la lucha de tierras de la hacienda Quinchuquí, en Otavalo, Ecuador. La investigación demuestra que fue solo durante la lucha de tierras que los campesinos llegaron a saber acerca de la usurpación colonial de tierras indígenas. Legitimando sus acciones políticas en términos de historia, ellos articularon una identidad política que enfatizaba cada vez más la etnicidad sobre la clase.

Portuguese abstract

Os estudos sobre o surgimento do movimentos indígena no Equador, que irrompeu no cenário político nacional em 1990, não deram atenção devida à consciência histórica indígena. Utilizando evidências históricas e etnográficas, este estudo examina a emergência da consciência histórica entre povos indígenas campesinos envolvidos na luta por território da Hacienda Quinchuquí, em Otavalo, no Equador. Esta pesquisa demonstra que foi somente durante essa luta por território que os campesinos ficaram cientes da dispossessão colonial de terras indígenas. Legitimando suas políticas sob uma perspectiva histórica, eles articularam uma identidade política que cada vez mais enfatizou etnia ao invés de classe.

Keywords

indigenous historical consciousnessindigeneityethnic consciousnessindigenous movementsindigenous activismland reformEcuadorAndesconciencia histórica indígenaindigeneidadconciencia étnicamovimientos indígenasactivismo indígenareforma agrariaEcuadorAndesconsciência indígena históricaindigeneidadeconsciência étnicamovimentos indígenasativismo indígenareforma agráriaEquadorAndes
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 411 - 440
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Without Indians, there are no haciendas’: Manuel de Rojas, Jesuit hacienda administrator, 1686.

2 ‘As far as the [agricultural] reform is concerned, it didn't happen; but there was the possibility of organising in order to take the lands’: Miguel Ángel Carlosama, indigenous intellectual, 2007.

3 See, for instance, Pachano, Simón, ‘Imagen, identidad, desigualdad’, in Puig, Salvador Martí i and Sanahuja, Josep (eds.), Etnicidad, autonomía y gobernabilidad en América Latina (Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 2004), pp. 65–78Google Scholar; and Cazar, Fernando Guerrero and Peralta, Pablo Ospina, El poder de la comunidad: ajuste estructural y movimiento indígena en los Andes ecuatorianos (Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2003)Google Scholar.

4 As argued by Stuart Hall, identities are ‘points of temporary attachment to the subject positions which discursive practices construct for us’. An effective articulation of the subject to a subject-position ‘requires, not only that the subject is “hailed” [into place as a social subject of particular discourses], but that the subject invests in the position’. Hall, Stuart, ‘Who Needs “Identity”?’, in du Gay, Paul, Evans, Jessica and Redman, Peter (eds.), Identity: A Reader (London: Sage, 2000), p. 19Google Scholar.

5 The literature is too vast to be cited here. The following are examples of the lines of work mentioned above. Selverston-Scher, Melina, Ethnopolitics in Ecuador: Indigenous Rights and the Strengthening of Democracy (Coral Gables, FL: North–South Center Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Yashar, Deborah, Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Becker, Marc, Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador's Modern Indigenous Movements (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008)Google Scholar; Novo, Carmen Martínez, ‘Evangelización y movilización étnica: el aporte de la misión salesiana al movimiento indígena de Cotopaxi’, in Buschges, Christian, Bustos, Guillermo and Kaltmeier, Olaf (eds.), Etnicidad y poder en los países andinos (Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional, 2007), pp. 261–74Google Scholar; Bretón, Víctor, ‘Desarrollo rural y etnicidad en las tierras altas de Ecuador’, in Bretón, Víctor and García, Francisco (eds.), Estado, etnicidad y movimientos sociales en América Latina: Ecuador en crisis (Barcelona: Icaria Editorial, 2003), pp. 217–65Google Scholar; Brysk, Alison, De la tribu a la aldea global: derechos de los pueblos indígenas, redes transnacionales y relaciones internacionales en América Latina (Barcelona: Bellaterra, 2009)Google Scholar; Colloredo-Mansfeld, Rudi, Fighting Like a Community: Andean Civil Society in an Era of Indian Uprisings (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Huarcaya, Sergio Miguel, ‘Performativity, Performance, and Indigenous Activism in Ecuador and the Andes’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 57: 3 (2015), pp. 806–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Joanne Rappaport has done crucial research on the history-making of the Páez or Nasa people of Colombia's southern Andes. Rappaport, Joanne, The Politics of Memory: Native Historical Interpretations in the Colombian Andes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

7 Wylie, Jonathan, ‘The White Man's Book: The Sense of Time, the Social Construction of Reality, and the Foundations of Nationhood in Dominica and the Faroe Islands’, in Hughes, Diane Owen and Trautman, Thomas R. (eds.), Time: Histories and Ethnologies (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1995), p. 32Google Scholar.

8 Canessa, Andrew, ‘The Past is not Another Country: Exploring Indigenous Histories in Bolivia’, History and Anthropology, 19: 4 (2008), p. 355CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Rüsen, Jörn, ‘Historical Consciousness: Narrative Structure, Moral Function, and Ontogenetic Development’, in Seixas, Peter (ed.), Theorizing Historical Consciousness (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004), pp. 66–8Google Scholar.

10 MacCormack, Sabine, On the Wings of Time: Rome, the Incas, Spain, and Peru (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009), p. 1Google Scholar.

11 See Burga, Manuel, Nacimiento de una utopía: muerte y resurrección de los incas (Lima: Instituto de Apoyo Agrario, 1988)Google Scholar; and Galindo, Alberto Flores, Buscando un inca: identidad y utopía en los Andes (Lima: Instituto de Apoyo Agrario, 1987)Google Scholar.

12 Méndez, Cecilia, ‘Incas Sí, Indios No: Notes on Peruvian Creole Nationalism and its Contemporary Crisis’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 28: 1 (1996), p. 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Hylton, Forrest and Thomson, Sinclair, Revolutionary Horizons: Past and Present in Bolivian Politics (New York: Verso, 2007)Google Scholar.

14 Canessa, ‘The Past is Not Another Country’, p. 367.

15 Cusicanqui, Silvia Rivera, ‘El potencial epistemológico y teórico de la historia oral: de la lógica instrumental a la descolonización de la historia’, Temas Sociales, 11 (1987), pp. 49–64Google Scholar.

16 Stephenson, Marcia, ‘Forging an Indigenous Counterpublic Sphere: The Taller de Historia Oral Andina in Bolivia’, Latin American Research Review, 37: 2 (2002), p. 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Benavides, O. Hugo, ‘Lo indígena en el pasado arqueológico: reflejos espectrales de la posmodernidad en el Ecuador’, in Gnecco, Cristóbal and Ayala, Patricia (eds.), Pueblos indígenas y arqueología en América Latina (Bogotá: CESO, 2010), p. 427Google Scholar.

18 Guerrero, Andrés, Administración de poblaciones, ventriloquía y transescritura (Quito: FLACSO, 2010), p. 161Google Scholar.

19 Guerrero, Andrés, ‘The Administration of the Dominated Populations under the Regime of Customary Citizenship: The Case of Postcolonial Ecuador’, in Thurner, Mark and Guerrero, Andrés (eds.), After Spanish Rule: Postcolonial Predicaments of the Americas (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003), pp. 272–309Google Scholar.

20 de Zaldívar, Víctor Bretón Solo, ‘Tempest in the Andes? Part 1: Agrarian Reform and Peasant Differentiation in Cotopaxi (Ecuador)’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 15: 1 (2015), p. 98Google Scholar; Thompson, E.P., ‘The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century’, Past and Present, 50 (1971), pp. 76–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Thurner, Mark, ‘Peasant Politics and Andean Haciendas in the Transition to Capitalism: An Ethnographic History’, Latin American Research Review, 28: 3 (1993), p. 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Larson, Brooke, ‘Indigeneity Unpacked: Politics, Civil Society, and Social Movements in the Andes’, Latin American Research Review, 49: 1 (2014), p. 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Conejo, Mario, Yamberla, José and Cachiguango, Imbaya, ‘Los Quichua-Otavalo: economía e identidad’, in Carrasco, Tania, Iturralde, Diego and Uquillas, Jorge (eds.), Doce experiencias de desarrollo indígena en América Latina (Quito: Abya-Yala, 2001), p. 181Google Scholar.

24 de Zaldívar, Víctor Bretón Solo, ‘Tempest in the Andes? Part 2: Peasant Organization and Development Agencies in Cotopaxi (Ecuador)’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 15: 2 (2015), pp. 179–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Lyons, Barry J., ‘Religion, Authority, and Identity: Intergenerational Politics, Ethnic Resurgence, and Respect in Chimborazo, Ecuador’, Latin American Research Review, 36: 1 (2001), p. 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 ‘Quinchuquí: la trampa del gamonal’, Contrapunto, 31 Oct. 1980, pp. 6–9. INDA archives, file 920.

27 Interview with Segundo Ramos, former member of the leadership of the Quinchuquí pre-cooperative, 9 Sept. 2006.

28 The first indigenous mayor of Otavalo, Mario Conejo, who served from 2000 to 2014, also grew up as a mestizo for a few years. Vinueza, José Almeida, ‘El indígena otavaleño urbano’, in Vinueza, José Almeida (ed.), Identidades indias en el Ecuador contemporáneo (Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala, 1995), pp. 157–8Google Scholar.

29 Colloredo-Mansfeld, Fighting Like a Community, p. 92.

30 Selverston-Scher, Ethnopolitics in Ecuador, p. 7; Guerrero Cazar and Ospina Peralta, El poder de la comunidad, p. 88.

31 López, Ernesto, ‘La ley de desarrollo agrario y la modernización’, Ecuador Debate, 32 (1994), p. 130Google Scholar.

32 In Andean Ecuador, until the early 1980s, the words indio and campesino had the same referent: indios were campesinos, and campesinos were indios. The term indio is also pejorative.

33 Pallares, Amalia, From Peasant Struggles to Indian Resistance: The Ecuadorian Andes in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 2002), p. 161Google Scholar.

34 Galarza, Jaime, El yugo feudal: visión del campo ecuatoriano (Quito: Ediciones Solitierra, 1979), p. 24Google Scholar.

35 Interview with Eduardo Cachimuel, former member of the leadership of the Quinchuquí pre-cooperative, 13 Aug. 2005.

36 Donación. El Señor Don Alfonso Barba Aguirre y su mujer Doña Beatriz Larrea de Barba a favor de sus hijos Rafael Barba Larrea, Beatriz Barba Larrea de Vascones, Rosa Barba Larrea de Freile, Cecilia Barba Larrea de Jijón Caamaño y el señor Carlos Montúfar Barba Larrea, 25 Nov. 1959, INDA archives, file 920.

37 Barsky, Osvaldo, La reforma agraria ecuatoriana (Quito: Corporación Editora Nacional, 1988), p. 52Google Scholar.

38 Waters, William F., ‘Indigenous Communities, Landlords, and the State: Land and Labor in Highland Ecuador, 1950–1975’, in Clark, Kim and Becker, Marc (eds.), Highland Indians and the State in Modern Ecuador (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007), p. 125Google Scholar.

39 Ibid., pp. 122–3.

40 CONADE, ‘Determinación de la presión demográfica en los predios Quinchuquí Alto, Quinchuquí Bajo y Cotama’, 22 Nov. 1979, INDA archives, file 920, appendix 2, p. 3.

41 CONADE, ‘Determinación de la presión demográfica’, p. 11.

42 Korovkin, Tanya, ‘Commodity Production and Ethnic Culture: Otavalo, Northern Ecuador’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47: 1 (1998), pp. 135–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Interview with Eduardo Cachimuel, 13 Aug. 2005.

44 Interview with José Carlos de la Torre, former president of the community council of Carabuela, 5 Aug. 2005.

45 Interview with José Carlos de la Torre, 5 Aug. 2005; Guerrero, Andrés, De la economía a las mentalidades: cambio social y conflictos agrarios en el Ecuador (Quito: Editorial El Conejo, 1991), p. 186Google Scholar.

46 Florentino Ramos, ‘Breve reseña histórica del conflicto agrario “Quinchuquí”’, Unpub. Secondary School Graduation Paper, Colegio Nacional Jacinto Collahuazo, 1986, p. 14.

47 Kyle, David, Transnational Peasants: Migrations, Networks, and Ethnicity in Andean Ecuador (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000), p. 136Google Scholar.

48 Ibid., pp. 136–7.

49 Guerrero, De la economía a las mentalidades, p. 174.

50 Leo Ralph Chavez, ‘Commercial Weaving and the Entrepreneurial Ethic: Otavalo Indian Views of Self and the World’, unpubl. PhD diss., Stanford University, 1982, pp. 89–98.

51 Barbara Y. Butler, ‘Indígena Ethnic Identity and Ethnic Identity Change in the Ecuadorian Sierra’, unpubl. PhD diss., University of Rochester, 1981, pp. 245–6.

52 Interview with Florentino Ramos, former leader of the Quinchuquí pre-cooperative, 14 June 2006.

53 Ibid.

54 Ibid.

55 Florentino Ramos, ‘Breve reseña histórica del conflicto agrario “Quinchuquí”’, p. 17.

56 Interview with Florentino Ramos, 14 June 2006.

57 Tanya Korovkin, ‘Indians, Peasants, and the State: The Growth of a Community Movement in the Ecuadorian Andes’, CERLAC Occasional Paper (1992), p. 18.

58 Interview with José Clelio Cachimuel, former leader of the San Vicente pre-cooperative, 24 Aug. 2006.

59 Ibid.

60 Elizabeth M. Rogers, ‘Ethnicity, Property, and the State: The Politics of Community in an Andean Village’, unpubl. PhD diss., University of Wisconsin, 2001, p. 295.

61 Interview with Florentino Ramos, 14 June 2006.

62 Bourdieu, Pierre, Le sens pratique (Paris: Les Éditions du Minuit, 1980)Google Scholar; English edition: The Logic of Practice (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

63 Bretón, ‘Tempest in the Andes? Part 1’, p. 94.

64 Interview with Eduardo Cachimuel, 9 July 2005.

65 Interview with Marco Burbano, former leftist activist, 16 Jan. 2006; interview with Augusto Parra, former leftist activist, 14 June 2005.

66 Interview with José Quimbo, indigenous intellectual, 22 Oct. 2006.

67 Pallares, Amalia, ‘Construcciones raciales, reforma agraria y movilización indígena en los años setenta’, in Rivera, Freddy and Cervone, Emma (eds.), Ecuador racista: imágenes e identidades (Quito: FLACSO, 1998), pp. 165–6Google Scholar.

68 CONADE, ‘Determinación de la presión demográfica’, pp. 2–5.

69 Oficio 4445, CONADE, Director Técnico al Director Regional Norte del IERAC, Nov. 1979, CEDHU archives.

70 Interview with Segundo Ramos, 20 Oct. 2006.

71 Interview with Segundo Ramos, 21 June 2006.

72 CONADE, ‘Determinación de la presión demográfica’, p. 10.

73 General Guillermo Rodríguez Lara, the key promoter of the land reform of 1973, was also an hacendado. General Guillermo Duran Arcentales, the strongman of the succeeding ruling triumvirate, was a rancher. Their estates were not expropriated. Isaacs, Anita, Military Rule and Transition in Ecuador, 1972–92 (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993), p. 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Pallares, ‘Construcciones raciales’, p. 164.

75 Isaacs, Military Rule and Transition in Ecuador, p. 121.

76 Villamarín, José, ‘Quinchuquí: el alto precio de la lucha’, Nueva, 59 (Nov. 1979), p. 52Google Scholar.

77 Ibid.; CEDHU, ‘Vejámenes sufridos por los campesinos de las comunas de Quinchuquí, Cotama y otras’, 1979, CEDHU archives; ‘Quinchuquí: la trampa del gamonal’.

78 Interview with Eduardo Cachimuel, 13 Sept. 2005.

79 CEDHU, Sesión de Comisión General, 6 March 1979, CEDHU archives.

80 Pre-cooperativa Agrícola Quinchuquí, ‘Manifestamos nuestra razón de lucha a la opinión pública’, April 1979, CEDHU archives.

81 Interview with Miguel Angel Carlosama, indigenous intellectual, 3 April 2007.

82 President Roldós died on 24 May 1981 in a plane crash. His vice-president, the sociologist Osvaldo Hurtado, assumed the presidency.

83 Glynn, Laura, ‘Quinchuquí: A Case Study on Rural Poverty in Ecuador’, Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, 1: 2 (1984), p. 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Ibid.

85 Richard N. Ostling, ‘Those Beleaguered Maryknollers’, Time (6 July 1981), p. 37.

86 Rogers, ‘Ethnicity, Property, and the State’, p. 303.

87 Ibid., p. 304.

88 The MPD was the electoral branch of the Partido Comunista Marxista Leninista del Ecuador (Communist Marxist-Leninist Party of Ecuador). Interview with Carmen Yamberla, indigenous activist, 4 Oct. 2005.

89 Attwood, Bain, Chakrabarty, Dipesh and Lomnitz, Claudio, ‘The Public Life of History’, Public Culture, 20: 1 (2008), p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Interview with Segundo Ramos, 21 June 2006.

91 Prieto, Mercedes, Liberalismo y temor (Quito: FLACSO, 2004), pp. 96–100Google Scholar.

92 Parsons, Elsie Clew, Peguche: A Study of Andean Indians (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1945), p. 13Google Scholar.

93 Lyons, Barry J., Remembering the Hacienda: Religion, Authority, and Social Change in Highland Ecuador (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2006), p. 129Google Scholar.

94 Lentz, Carola, ‘La construcción de la alteridad cultural como respuesta a la discriminación étnica’, in Guerrero, Andrés (ed.), Etnicidades (Quito: FLACSO, 2000), p. 211Google Scholar.

95 Cervone, Emma, Long Live Atahualpa: Indigenous Politics, Justice, and Democracy in the Northern Andes (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012)Google Scholar; Corr, Rachel, Ritual and Remembrance in the Ecuadorian Andes (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Corr, Rachel and Powers, Karen Vieira, ‘¿Trasplantes incaicos o etnogénesis poscolonial? El origen de los salasacas de la Sierra ecuatoriana’, Procesos: Revista Ecuatoriana de Historia, 40 (2014), pp. 37–62Google Scholar.

96 Interview with Segundo Ramos, 21 June 2006.

97 Interview with Carmen Yamberla, 4 Oct. 2005.

98 Interview with Segundo Ramos, 21 June 2006.

99 Joanne Rappaport, Politics of Memory, p. 176.

100 Florentino Ramos, ‘Breve reseña histórica del conflicto agrario “Quinchuquí’”, p. 36.

101 Interview with Carmen Yamberla, 4 Oct. 2005.

102 Rogers, ‘Ethnicity, Property, and the State’, p. 253.

103 Ibid., pp. 253–4.

104 Guerrero, De la economía a las mentalidades, p. 160.

105 Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John L., Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991), p. 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

106 Interview with Blanca Chancoso, indigenous leader, 25 July 2005.