Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:38:10.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making a Brazilian New Deal: Oliveira Vianna and the Transnational Sources of Brazil's Corporatist Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2018

MELISSA TEIXEIRA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the legal writings of Brazilian sociologist and jurist Francisco José de Oliveira Vianna to reveal the global context that shaped Brazil's corporatist experiment in the 1930s. From the Labour Ministry, Oliveira Vianna was at the forefront of legal and political debates over how to create corporatist laws and institutions. He was often cast as an authoritarian and retrograde thinker, yet this article looks beyond those categories to examine how his engagement with the US New Deal inserted corporatism into global debates over the role of the state in economic recovery and social welfare.

Spanish abstract

Este artículo explora los escritos jurídicos del sociólogo y jurista brasileño Francisco José de Oliveira Vianna para mostrar el contexto global en el que se forjó el experimento corporativista de Brasil en los 1930s. Desde el Ministerio del Trabajo, Oliveira Vianna estuvo a la cabeza de los debates legales y políticos alrededor de cómo crear leyes e instituciones corporativas. Oliveira Vianna está catalogado con frecuencia como un pensador autoritario y retrógrado, pero este artículo mira más allá de estas categorías para examinar más bien cómo su conexión con el New Deal estadounidense incorporó el corporativismo a los debates globales sobre el papel del estado en la recuperación económica y el bienestar social.

Portuguese abstract

Este artigo explora os textos jurídicos do sociólogo e jurista brasileiro Francisco José de Oliveira Vianna para expor o contexto global que moldou o experimento corporativista dos anos 30 no Brasil. Oliveira Vianna, do Ministério do Trabalho, esteve à frente dos debates políticos e legais sobre como criar leis e instituições corporativistas. Oliveira Vianna é geralmente classificado como pensador autoritário e retrógrado, mas esse artigo vai além dessas categorias para examinar como o seu envolvimento com o New Deal dos EUA inseriu o corporativismo em debates globais sobre o papel do Estado na recuperação da economia e no bem-estar social.

Keywords

Brazillegal and constitutional historyUS New DealOliveira Viannacorporatismglobal historyBrasilhistoria del pensamiento jurídico y constitucionalUS New DealOliveira Viannacorporativismohistoria globalBrasilhistória constitucional e legalUS New DealOliveira Viannacorporatismohistória global
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , August 2018 , pp. 613 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

For their helpful suggestions and insight, I would like to thank Jeremy Adelman, André Botelho, Pablo Fernandez-Vazquez, Christopher Florio, John French, Hendrik Hartog, Robert Karl, Rebecca Rix, Daniel Rodgers and Barbara Weinstein. The article also benefited from the thoughtful readings and insightful comments provided by three anonymous reviewers and editors at JLAS. All shortcomings are my own. Research for this article was made possible with funding from the Fulbright Commission in Brazil, Princeton Program in Latin American Studies, and a History Project grant, as well as the invaluable support of archivists and staff at the Casa de Oliveira Vianna in Niterói, Brazil.

References

1 Moses Aronson to Oliveira Vianna, 6 April 1939, Casa de Oliveira Vianna, Niterói, Brazil (hereafter COV), OVN-CP-0065.04.

2 ‘Dr. Moses J. Aronson Resigns’, The New Scholasticism, 15 (July 1941), p. 284.

3 Aronson to Oliveira Vianna, 6 April 1939, COV, OVN-CP-0065.04.

4 Temin, Peter and Toniolo, Gianni, The World Economy between the Wars (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 94–6Google Scholar.

5 Consequences of the Great Depression varied across Latin America, depending on the size/autonomy of national markets and the ‘commodity lottery’. Carlos Díaz Alejandro, ‘Latin America in the 1930s’, in Thorp, Rosemary (ed.), Latin America in the 1930s: The Role of the Periphery in World Crisis (Oxford: Macmillan, 1984), pp. 19–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for a more recent synthesis, Drinot, Paulo and Knight, Alan (eds.), The Great Depression in Latin America (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Rodgers, Daniel, Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), p. 416Google Scholar.

7 Wiarda, Howard, ‘Corporatism and Development in the Iberic-Latin World: Persistent Strains and New Variations’, The Review of Politics, 36: 1 (1974), p. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Schmitter, Philippe, ‘Still the Century of Corporatism?’, The Review of Politics, 36: 1 (1974), pp. 99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Political scientists in the 1970s and 1980s took systematic interest in corporatism. While they attempted to disassociate corporatism from its pejorative connotations, their focus on Latin America and southern Europe cemented it as an authoritarian solution for underdeveloped nations: Wiarda, Howard, Corporatism and Comparative Politics: The Other Great ‘Ism’ (Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1997)Google Scholar; Wiarda, Howard, Corporatism and National Development in Latin America (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Williamson, Peter, Varieties of Corporatism: A Conceptual Discussion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

10 In Italy, corporatism was a core component of Fascism, but not all corporatist regimes are Fascist. Brazil's home-grown Fascist movement, Integralismo, had several branches, but corporatism was mostly an afterthought. Vargas suppressed Integralismo in 1938. Bertonha, João Fábio, O Integralismo e sua história: memória, fontes, historiografia (Salvador: Editora PontoCom, 2016)Google Scholar.

11 Schmitter, ‘Still the Century of Corporatism?’, pp. 87–8. On the New Deal, Brand, Donald, Corporatism and the Rule of Law: A Study of the National Recovery Administration (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

12 On technocratic elements, Diniz, Eli, ‘Engenharia institucional e políticas públicas: Dos conselhos técnicos às câmaras setoriais’, in Pandolfi, Dulce (ed.), Repensando o Estado Novo (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1999), pp. 27–30Google Scholar.

13 An exception is Love's work on Romania and Brazil, which argues that corporatism gave rise to structuralist thought: Love, Joseph, Crafting the Third World: Theorizing Underdevelopment in Rumania and Brazil (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar. Recently, scholars have recuperated corporatism, in comparative perspective. Martinho, Francisco Carlos Palomanes and Pinto, António Costa (eds.), A vaga corporativa: Corporativismo e ditaduras na Europa e na América Latina (Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais, 2016)Google Scholar; Martinho, Francisco Carlos Palomanes and Pinto, António Costa (eds.), O corporativismo em português: Estado, política e sociedade no salazarismo e no varguismo (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2007)Google Scholar; Musiedlak, Didier (ed.), Les expériences corporatives dans l'aire latine (Bern: Lang, 2010)Google Scholar. Nevertheless, we still lack transnational discussions of corporatism.

14 de Carvalho, José Murilo, ‘A Utopia de Oliveira Viana’, in de Carvalho, José Murilo (ed.), Pontos e bordados: Escritos de história e política (Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 1998), pp. 205–6Google Scholar. The spelling of Oliveira Vianna's name was not consistent in his day. Both ‘Vianna’ and ‘Viana’ were used, albeit ‘Vianna’ seems to be the more common spelling.

15 Finchelstein, Federico, Transatlantic Fascism: Ideology, Violence, and the Sacred in Argentina and Italy, 1919–1945 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Palti, Elías José, ‘The Problem of “Misplaced Ideas” Revisited: Beyond the “History of Ideas” in Latin America’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 67: 1 (2006), pp. 149–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sanders, James, The Vanguard of the Atlantic World: Creating Modernity, Nation, and Democracy in Nineteenth-Century Latin America (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 For a model of how to write the intellectual history of the ‘periphery’, Bayly, Christopher, Recovering Liberties: Indian Thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), p. 3Google Scholar.

17 Patel, Kiran Klaus, The New Deal: A Global History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Needell, Jeffrey D., ‘History, Race, and the State in the Thought of Oliveira Viana’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 75: 1 (1995), pp. 4–8Google Scholar.

19 Bresciani, Maria Stella Martins, O charme da ciência e a sedução da objetividade: Oliveira Vianna entre intérpretes do Brasil (São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2005), pp. 33, 355Google Scholar.

20 Sociologist João Batista de Vasconcelos Torres quoted in Vieira, Evaldo Amaro, Oliveira Vianna e o estado corporativo: Um estudo sobre corporativismo e autoritarismo (São Paulo: Editorial Grijalbo, 1976), p. 28Google Scholar.

21 Botelho, André, ‘Passado e futuro das interpretações do país’, Tempo Social: Revista de Sociologia da USP, 22: 1 (2010), pp. 47–66Google Scholar; de Holanda, Sérgio Buarque, Raízes do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Livraria José Olympio, 1936)Google Scholar; Freyre, Gilberto, Casa grande e senzala (Madrid: Allca, 2002)Google Scholar; de Oliveira Vianna, Francisco José, Populações meridionais do Brasil I: populações rurais do centro-sul (Brasília: Senado Federal, 2005)Google Scholar.

22 Stepan, Nancy, ‘The Hour of Eugenics’: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), p. 155Google Scholar.

23 Freyre, Gilberto, Sobrados e mucambos: Decadencia do patriarchado rural do Brasil (São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1936), p. 372Google Scholar; Rodrigues, José Honório, História da história do Brasil: A metafísica do latifúndio, o ultrarreacionário Oliveira Viana, vol. 2 (São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1979), pp. 6, 236–9Google Scholar. Scant biographical evidence exists to confirm his mixed-race ancestry: Needell, ‘History, Race, and the State’, p. 17.

24 Nelson Werneck Sodré argued this point, based only on Populações meridionais do Brasil I. Sodré, Nelson Werneck, A ideologia do colonialismo: Seus reflexos no pensamento brasileiro (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1965), pp. 165–253Google Scholar.

25 Ângela de Castro Gomes called him ‘the last of the saquaremas’, a nineteenth-century party of landed elites: de Castro Gomes, Ângela, ‘O práxis corporativa de Oliveira Vianna’, in de Moraes, João Quartim and Bastos, Élide Rugai (eds.), O pensamento de Oliveira Vianna (Campinas: Editora Unicamp, 1993), p. 57Google Scholar.

26 Needell, ‘History, Race, and the State’, p. 28.

27 Diniz, Eli, ‘O pensamento autoritário dos anos 30’, Ciência Hoje, 5: 29 (March 1987), pp. 60–5Google Scholar; Vieira, Oliveira Vianna e o estado corporativo; Silva, Ricardo, A ideologia do estado autoritário no Brasil (Chapecó: Argos Editora Universitária, 2004)Google Scholar; de Castro Gomes, Ângela, ‘Autoritarismo e corporativismo no Brasil: O legado de Vargas’, in Bastos, Pedro Paulo Zahluth and Fonseca, Pedro Cezar Dutra (eds.), A era Vargas: Desenvolvimentismo, economia e sociedade (São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2011), pp. 69–92Google Scholar.

28 Moraes and Bastos rehabilitated the study of Oliveira Vianna with their canonical volume, O pensamento de Oliveira Vianna.

29 de Oliveira Vianna, Francisco José, Evolução do povo brasileiro (São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1938), p. 11Google Scholar.

30 Vianna, Oliveira's most emblematic work on this topic is Raça e assimilação, 2nd edn (São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1934)Google Scholar. See also de Souza Ramos, Jair, ‘Ciência e racismo: Uma leitura crítica de Raça e assimilação em Oliveira Vianna’, História, Ciências, Saúde–Manguinhos, 10: 2 (2003), pp. 573–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skidmore, Thomas, Black into White: Race and Nationality in Brazilian Thought (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993), p. 204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Populações meridionais do Brasil was a three-volume series (only the first was published in his lifetime). It identified three societies in Brazil: the sertanejo in the north, matuto for the south-centre, and gaúcho of the south, each with a distinct racial composition and born from particular geo-climatic circumstances. The challenge for any government was to unify these into a nation. Oliveira Vianna, Populações meridionais do Brasil I, p. 52.

32 Burke, Peter and Pallares-Burke, Maria Lúcia, Gilberto Freyre: Social Theory in the Tropics (Oxford: Peter Lang, 2008)Google Scholar.

33 Oliveira Vianna vowed to never read another book by Freyre, and seemed true to his word since only one of Freyre's books is in his library. Oliveira Vianna to his editor, n.d. [likely 1933/4], COV, OVN-CA-0001.16.

34 Oliveira Vianna, Populações meridionais do Brasil I, p. 173.

35 Oliveira Vianna, legal opinion on Chinese immigration, n.d., COV, Box 6 [pareceres, ‘legal opinions’], no. 2286.

36 Ibid.

37 Oliveira Vianna, Evolução do povo brasileiro, p. 246.

38 Oliveira Vianna, Populações meridionais do Brasil I, p. 193.

39 Oliveira Vianna, Evolução do povo brasileiro, p. 120.

40 de Oliveira Vianna, Francisco José, O idealismo da constituição (São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1939), p. 84Google Scholar.

41 Ibid., p. 69.

42 Ibid., p. 68.

43 Ibid., p. 94.

44 On the political potency of the category ‘Anglo-Saxon civilisation’, Kramer, Paul, ‘Empires, Exceptions and Anglo-Saxons: Race and Rule between the British and United States Empires, 1880–1910’, The Journal of American History, 88: 4 (2002), pp. 1315–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Thorp (ed.), Latin America in the 1930s, Tables 2 and 4; Gordon-Ashworth, Fiona, ‘Agricultural Commodity Control under Vargas in Brazil, 1930–1945’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 12: 1 (1980), p. 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 ‘Introduction’, in Thorp (ed.), Latin America in the 1930s, p. 1.

47 For how economic elites pushed for stronger banking and financial institutions in interwar Latin America, and the interactions between foreign experts and local statesmen in this process, Drake, Paul, The Money Doctor in the Andes: The Kemmerer Missions, 1923–1933 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

48 For how ‘corporatist’ policies were implemented through state violence and savvy political realignments, Whitney, Robert, State and Revolution in Cuba: Mass Mobilization and Political Change, 1920–1940 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2001)Google Scholar. Social politics often depended on and reproduced patriarchal family norms; see Rosemblatt, Karin Alejandra, Gendered Compromises: Political Cultures and the State in Chile, 1920–1950 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

49 On how ideas of race shaped interwar policy-making, Drinot, Paulo, The Allure of Labor: Workers, Race, and the Making of the Peruvian State (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 On social citizenship and law in Brazil, Fischer, Brodwyn, A Poverty of Rights: Citizenship and Inequality in Twentieth-Century Rio de Janeiro (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

51 Raphael Correa e Oliveira to Oswaldo Aranha, 20 Nov. 1933, Centro de Pesquisa e Documentação de História Contemporânea do Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (hereafter CPDOC), Arquivo Oswaldo Aranha, OA33.01.09, microfilm 11, no. 0304.

52 de Azevedo, José Affonso Mendonça, Elaborando a Constituição nacional: Atas da subcomissão elaboradora do anteprojeto 1932/1933 (Brasília: Senado Federal, 1933), pp. xii–xviiiGoogle Scholar.

53 de Castro Gomes, Ângela, ‘A representação de classes na constituinte de 1934’, Revista de Ciência Política, 21: 3 (1978), pp. 53–116Google Scholar.

54 Oliveira Vianna to Afrânio Melo Franco, n.d. [likely 1932/3], COV, OVN-CA-0031.01.

55 Oliveira Vianna, n.d. [likely 1932/3], COV, OVN-CA-0001.10.

56 Ibid.

57 Citing Charles Merriam's New Aspects of Politics (1925), de Oliveira Vianna, Francisco José, Problemas de política objetiva, 2nd edn (São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1947), pp. 172–3Google Scholar.

58 Oliveira Vianna to Afrânio Melo Franco, n.d. [1932/3], COV, OVN-CA-0031.01.

59 Oliveira Vianna, n.d. [1932/3], COV, OVN-CA-0001.10.

60 Ibid.

61 Skidmore, Thomas E., Politics in Brazil, 1930–1964: An Experiment in Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), pp. 4–21Google Scholar.

62 Domingos Velasco, socialist-leaning delegate from Goiás, quoting Populações Meridionais do Brasil I, 14 Dec. 1933, Annaes da Assembléa Nacional Constituinte 1933/1934, Vol. 2 (Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1935), pp. 294–8Google Scholar.

63 To compare drafts, Carneiro, Levi, Pela nova constituição (Rio de Janeiro: Editor Coelho Branco, 1936), pp. 738–881Google Scholar.

64 Articles 115–43, Constituição da Republica dos Estados Unidos do Brasil (Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1934)Google Scholar.

65 Levi Carneiro, 2 Dec. 1933, National Constitutional Assembly, Annaes da Assembléa Nacional Constituinte 1933/1934, p. 42.

66 ‘Aperfeiçoamento’, Correio da Manhã, 22 July 1937.

67 Philadelpho Azevedo, ‘Vida jurídica’, Jornal do Commercio, 3 July 1937, p. 2.

68 de Oliveira Vianna, Francisco José, Problemas de direito corporativo (Rio de Janeiro: Livraria José Olympio Editora, 1938), p. 34Google Scholar.

69 Costa Rego, ‘Inconstitucionalidades’, Correio da Manhã, 19 June 1937.

70 On Ferreira, Dulles, John F., The São Paulo Law School and the Anti-Vargas Resistance, 1938–1945 (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1986), pp. 10–30Google Scholar.

71 Ferreira, Waldemar, As directrizes do direito mercantil brasileiro (Lisbon, Tip. da Emprêsa do Anuário Comercial: 1933), p. 186Google Scholar.

72 Essays published serially in Sunday editions of Jornal do Commercio in August 1937.

73 Problemas de direito corporativo is relatively unknown among Oliveira Vianna's writings. A handful of scholars have examined these legal essays, yet often narrowly, as a summary of his project for labour relations: Vanda Maria Ribeiro Costa, ‘Corporativismo e justiça social: O projeto de Oliveira Vianna’, in Moraes and Bastos (eds.), O pensamento de Oliveira Vianna, pp. 131–43. More recently, Luciano Aronne de Abreu has considered the essays in the context of interwar authoritarian thought, comparing Oliveira Vianna with Manoïlesco to analyse whether Brazilian corporatism conforms to an ideal type: de Abreu, Luciano Aronne, ‘Sindicalismo e corporativismo no Brasil: O olhar autoritário de Oliveira Viana’, in de Abreu, Luciano Aronne and Motta, Rodrigo Patto Sá (eds.), Autoritarismo e cultura política (Porto Alegre: Editora FGV, 2013), pp. 109–20Google Scholar. We lack, still, an analysis of Problemas de direito corporativo in its wider global legal context, and in relation to the foreign examples mobilised within the text.

74 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de direito corporativo, p. 28.

75 Ibid., p. vii.

76 Kennedy, Duncan, ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000’, in Trubek, David and Santos, Alvaro (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 21–2Google Scholar.

77 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de direito corporativo, p. 38.

78 Ibid., p. 64.

79 Oliveira Vianna generalised the mechanics of the Amendment, but captured its spirit. Riches, E. J., ‘Compulsory Arbitration in New Zealand’, Personnel Journal (April 1937), pp. 350–9Google Scholar.

80 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de direito corporativo, p. 89.

81 Ibid.

82 Ibid., p. 87.

83 dos Santos, Wanderley Guilherme, Ordem burguesa e liberalismo político (São Paulo: Livraria Duas Cidades, 1978), pp. 65–119Google Scholar; Fabio Gentile, ‘Uma apropriação criativa: Fascismo e corporativismo no pensamento de Oliveira Vianna’, in Martinho and Pinto (eds.), A vaga corporativa, pp. 223–53.

84 Horwitz, Morton J., The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 170Google Scholar.

85 Ibid., p. 142.

86 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de direito corporativo, p. 14.

87 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de direito corporativo, p. 39; Vianna marginalia, Oliveira, Freund, Ernst, Administrative Powers over Persons and Property: A Comparative Survey (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1928), pp. 33–43Google Scholar, COV, library ref. 4313F889a.

88 Critiques of the New Deal abound. See Ira Katznelson's work for its international perspective, especially the ambivalent position of US statesmen towards European dictators, and for recasting the role of segregationists in New Deal policy-making: Katznelson, Ira, Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time (New York: Liveright Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar.

89 On how ‘volatile’ and heterogeneous ‘progressivism’ was, Rodgers, Daniel, ‘In Search of Progressivism’, Reviews in American History, 10: 4 (1982), pp. 113–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Leonard, Thomas, ‘American Economic Reform in the Progressive Era: Its Foundational Beliefs and Their Relation to Eugenics’, History of Political Economy, 41: 1 (2009), pp. 109–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 On corporate liberalism, Kolko, Gabriel, The Triumph of Conservatism: A Re-interpretation of American History, 1900–1916 (New York: The Free Press, 1963)Google Scholar; Sklar, Martin, The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890–1916: The Market, the Law, and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Weinstein, James, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State: 1900–1918 (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1968)Google Scholar. For ‘regulatory capture’, Novak, William, ‘A Revisionist History of Regulatory Capture’, in Carpenter, Daniel and Moss, David (eds.), Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 25–48Google Scholar.

92 Horwitz, Transformation of American Law, p. 214.

93 Patel, The New Deal, p. 72.

94 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de direito corporativo, p. 42.

95 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de política objetiva, p. 191.

96 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de direito corporativo, p. 65.

97 Highlighted by Vianna, Oliveira, Pound, Roscoe, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1930), pp. 138–9Google Scholar, COV, library ref. 340.1P875i.

98 Highlighted by Vianna, Oliveira, Corwin, Edward S., The Twilight of the Supreme Court: A History of Our Constitutional Theory (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1934), p. xviGoogle Scholar, COV, library ref. 341.240942C832t.

99 Oliveira Vianna marginalia and underlining, ibid., p. 99.

100 Little research exists on Oliveira Vianna's pareceres. This author read through thousands, archived at Casa de Oliveira Vianna, to make these observations. See ‘José Wetting contra Khair Irmãos’, 10 Aug. 1932, COV, Box 2 [pareceres], no. 1782.

101 Oliveira Vianna, Problemas de direito corporativo, pp. 48–51.

102 Carvalho, ‘A Utopia de Oliveira Viana’, p. 208.

103 Agamenon Magalhães, ‘Problemas de direito corporativo’, Correio Paulistano, 3 July 1938.

104 Oliveira Vianna to Valdemar Falcão (Labour Minister), May/June 1936, CPDOC, Arquivo Valdemar Falcão, VFpiViana, F.J.O.38/05/06.00.

105 Urofsky, Melvin, Louis D. Brandeis: A Life (New York: Schocken Books, 2009), pp. 201–4Google Scholar.

106 Discussed briefly in Vieira, Evaldo Amaro, Autoritarismo e corporativismo no Brasil (São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2010), pp. 70–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107 Francisco José de Oliveira Vianna, ‘O Juiz Brandeis e o seu americanismo’, Revista Forense (March 1939), pp. 169–70.

108 Highlighted by Vianna, Oliveira, Mason, Alpheus Thomas, Brandeis: Lawyer and Judge in the Modern State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1933), p. 181Google Scholar, COV, library ref. 320M398b.

109 Horwitz, Transformation of American Law, p. 209.

110 Berk, Gerald, Louis D. Brandeis and the Making of Regulated Competition, 1900–1932 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

111 Francisco José de Oliveira Vianna, ‘Brandeis e o seu americanismo’, Correio da Manhã, 21 March 1939.

112 Francisco José de Oliveira Vianna, ‘O individuo e o grupo’, Correio da Manhã, 28 March 1939.

113 Ibid.

114 Aronson, Moses, ‘Tendencies in American Jurisprudence’, The University of Toronto Law Journal, 4: 1 (1941), pp. 90–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

115 Mason, Alpheus Thomas, The Brandeis Way: A Case Study in the Workings of Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1938)Google Scholar.

116 Aronson, Moses, ‘Democracy in Action: The Brandeis Way’, Journal of Social Philosophy (Jan. 1939), p. 155Google Scholar.

117 Hobsbawm, Eric, Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991 (London: Vintage Books, 1994)Google Scholar.

118 ‘Address by Alpheus T. Mason’, United States Law Review (Nov. 1938), p. 634. Louis Dembitz Brandeis Collection, Brandeis University Archive, Waltham, MA, Box 72.

119 Aronson, ‘Democracy in Action’, pp. 160–1.

120 Oliveira Vianna, ‘O individuo e o grupo’.

121 Schlesinger, Arthur Jr., The Politics of Upheaval: The Age of Roosevelt 1935–1936 (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1960), p. 280Google Scholar.

122 Aronson, ‘Democracy in Action: The Brandeis Way’, p. 161.

123 Vianna, Oliveira, Problemas de direito sindical (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Max Limonad, 1943)Google Scholar.

124 Oliveira Vianna, ‘O individuo e o grupo’.

125 da Silva, Fernando Teixeira, ‘The Brazilian and Italian Labor Courts: Comparative Notes’, International Review of Social History, 55 (2010), pp. 381–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

126 Oliveira Vianna, ‘O individuo e o grupo’.

127 Otto Prazeres, ‘Como realizar a democracia?’, Jornal do Brasil, 1 April 1939.

128 Ibid.

129 George R. Farnum (Boston lawyer and Aronson's friend) to Oliveira Vianna, 10 April 1939, COV, OVN-CP-0298.01.

130 Underlined in original. Aronson to Oliveira Vianna, 14 April 1939, COV, OVN-CP-0065.01.

131 Aronson to Oliveira Vianna, 11 July 1939, COV, OVN-CP-0065.02

132 Patel, The New Deal, pp. 56–90.

133 Loewenstein, Karl, Brazil under Vargas (New York: Macmillan, 1942)Google Scholar.

134 Costa, Vandá Maria Ribeiro, Origens do corporativismo brasileiro (Rio de Janeiro: CPDOC, 1991), pp. 41–65Google Scholar.

135 Still in place, the Justiça do Trabalho is often considered another shortcoming of Brazil's legal system, serving industrialists and weighed down by bureaucracy and corruption. Yet John French highlights how workers did bring grievances before the court, a process that shaped the legal consciousness of Brazilians: French, John, Drowning in Laws: Labor Law and Brazilian Political Culture (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

136 ‘Dr. Moses J. Aronson Resigns’, p. 285.

137 Postcard from Florence (Italy), Aronson to Oliveira Vianna, 1 March 1945, COV, OVN-CP-0065.05.

138 de Oliveira Vianna, Francisco José, ‘Brandeis e seu individualismo grupalista’, in Problemas de organização e problemas de direção: O povo e o governo (Rio de Janeiro: J. Olympio, 1952), p. 157Google Scholar.

139 Ibid., pp. 155–6.

140 Burgin, Angus, The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

141 Oliveira Vianna, ‘Brandeis e seu individualismo grupalista’, pp. 159–60.