Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:42:43.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethics Consultation: Persistent Brain Death and Religion: Must a Person Believe in Death to Die?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jeffrey Spike  and
Jane Greenlaw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We first heard about this case from nurses in one of our intensive care units (ICUs) while we were conducting an inservice. When the session was over, we discussed it between ourselves, and decided that it must have been misrepresented. The case had been presented as one of a teenager who was brain dead, had been so for six months, yet had been brought into the ICU for treatment. We have run into this before, we thought: medical professionals confusing brain death with persistent vegetative state (PVS). But, of course, we reasoned, no one can be brain dead for six months. To us, as it would to many, the case sounded like a clinical and ethical impossibility.

A week later, we were called by an attending physician from another ICU, at the urging of that unit's nursing staff. They had a patient who was brain dead, whose presence was causing distress among the staff. Ronald Chamberlain, a fifteen-year-old boy, had been a patient at a nearby longterm rehabilitation facility that is equipped to care for ventilator-dependent patients.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , Fall 1995 , pp. 291 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Academy of Pediatrics, Report of Special Task Force, “Guidelines for the Determination of Brain Death in Children,” Pediatrics, 80 (1987): 298–300.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Life's Dominion (New York: Vintage Press, 1993): At 226–31.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, Harm To Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984): At 79–95.Google Scholar
Halevy, Amir Brody, Baruch, “Brain Death: Reconciling Definitions, Criteria, and Tests,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 119 (1993): 519–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, “Death,” in Mortal Questions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979): 1–10.Google Scholar
Pitcher, George, “The Misfortunes of the Dead,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 21 (1984): 183–88.Google Scholar
Rachels, James, The End of Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986): At 39–59.Google Scholar
Rowland, T.W., “Brain Death in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. A Clinical Definition,” American Journal of Diseases of the Child, 137 (1983): 547–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, Tom, “Misunderstanding Death on a Respirator,” Bioethics, 4 (1990): 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, K. Moore, B., eds., Anencephalics, Infants and Brain Death Treatment Options and the Issue of Organ Donation (Melbourne: Law Reform Commission of Victoria, Melbourne, 1991).Google Scholar
Veatch, Robert, “The Impending Collapse of the Whole-Brain Definition of Death,” Hastings Center Report, 23, no. 4 (1993): 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngner, Stuart, “‘Brain Death’ and Organ Retrieval,” JAMA, 261 (1989): 2209.Google Scholar