Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:17:29.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managed Competition in Health Care Reform: Just Another American Dream, or the Perfect Solution?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Uwe E. Reinhardt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Throughout the post-World War II decades, the United States has wrestled in its own unique style with a problem that is shared by all modern societies: how to achieve a reasonably equitable distribution of health care, without losing control of total spending on health care, and without suffocating the delivery system with controls and regulations that inhibit technical progress.

Because an equitable distribution of health care inevitably requires at least some government regulation, and because government regulations tend to impose rigidity on any system, it is widely believed in the United States (and elsewhere) that a trade-off actually exists between fairness in the distribution of care and the health system’s ability to innovate. This troublesome trade-off bedevils American policy makers to this day.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , Summer 1994 , pp. 106 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See Altman, Stuart H., Rodwin, Marc A., “Halfway Competitive Markets and Ineffective Regulation: The American Health Care System,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 13, no. 2 (1988): 323–40.Google Scholar
For a critical assessment of the American health system, see Reinhardt, Uwe E., “The United States: Breakthroughs and Waste,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 7, no. 4 (1992): 637–66.Google Scholar
Altman, , Rodwin, , op. cit., p. 333.Google Scholar
A useful compendium containing the proceedings of a conference on competition in health care, and reflecting thought at the time, can be found in Greenberg, Warren, ed., Competition in Health Care (Germantown, Maryland: Aspen Systems Corporation, 1978). A decade later, that compendium was followed by a retrospective published in the form of a series of papers in the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 13, no. 2 (1988).Google Scholar
The bulk of American households receive their health insurance from their employers. Typically, such a policy might require the family to pay $300 or so per year out of pocket before any insurance coverage sets in at all, and then to pay 20 percent of all health care bills until a maximum out-of-pocket amount of, say, $3,000 per year is reached.Google Scholar
See, for example, Schieber, George J., Pouillier, Jean-Pierre, Greenwald, Leslie M., “Health Spending, Delivery, and Outcomes in OECD Countries,” Health Affairs, Summer (1993): 120–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Congressional Budget Office, Trends in Health Spending: An Update (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office, June, 1993), p. 2.Google Scholar
See Enthoven, Alain C., “Why Managed Competition Has Failed to Contain Health Costs,” Health Affairs, Fall (1993): 27-43. See also Enthoven, Alain C., “Consumer-Choice Health Plan,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 298 (1978): 650–58 and 709-20; and the subsequent revision of the plan in Enthoven, Alain C., Kronick, Richard, “A Consumer-Choice Health Plan for the 1990s,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 320 (1989): 29-37; and 320 (1989): 94-101.Google Scholar
As the famous health insurance experiment conducted by the RAND Corporation during the 1970s had suggested, in a carefully controlled setting, coinsurance and deductibles do reduce the use of health care and total health spending substantially, other things being equal. See Manning, Willard G., Newhouse, Joseph P., Duan, Naihua, Keeler, Emmett, Leibowitz, Arleen, Marquis, M. Susan, “Health Insurance and the Demand for Medicare Care: Results from a Randomized Experiment,” American Economic Review, 77, no. 3 (1987): 251–77.Google Scholar
Data furnished to the author by the Medstat Corporation of Ann Arbor, Michigan, a private firm which tracks the health care utilization and expenditures of several million American households on behalf of the business corporations who pay the health insurance premiums for these households.Google Scholar
See Berk, Marc L., Monheit, Alan C., “The Concentration of Health Expenditures,” Health Affairs, Winter (1992): 145–49.Google Scholar
This section draws heavily on Reinhardt, Uwe E., “Reorganizing the Financial Flows in U.S. Health Care,” Health Affairs, Supplement (1993): 172–73.Google Scholar
For example, the Cooper-Breaux bill (H.R. 3222/S. 1579) introduced by Congressman Cooper (D.-Tenn.) and Senator Breaux (D.-Louisiana), and virtually all of the plans proposed by Republicans, such as the Thomas–Chafee bill (H.R. 3704/S. 1770) and the Stearns–Nickles bill (H.R. 3698/S. 1743). For a convenient summary of these plans, see U.S. Congress, The Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, Summary Comparison of Selected Health Care Reform Bills, mimeograph, March 2, 1994.Google Scholar
Notably the McDermott-Wellstone bill (H.R. 1200/S. 491).Google Scholar
See Enthoven, , Kronick, , op. cit.; and Enthoven, Paul M., Etheridge, Lynn, “The Jackson Hole Initiative for a Twenty First Century American Health System,” Health Economics, 1, no. 3 (1992): 149–68.Google Scholar
President Clinton's Health Security Act (H.R. 3600/S. 1757) or the chairman's remark from the Committee of Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives, passed by the Committee on June, 1994.Google Scholar
See Enthoven, , Kronick, , op. cit.Google Scholar
Somers, Herman M., Somers, Anne R., “Major Issues in National Health Insurance,” The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, April (1972): 177–210.Google Scholar
See, in particular, Ellwood, , Enthoven, , Etheridge, , op. cit.Google Scholar
California Department of Insurance, California Health Care in the 21st Century: A Vision for Reform, mimeograph, August, 1992.Google Scholar
To be included on the menu, a plan would have to conform to certain rules and regulations stipulated either in the federal or state statutes, or promulgated by the HIPC itself.Google Scholar
See Vladeck, Bruce C., “Old Snake Oil in New Bottles,” The President's Letter, United Hospital Fund, September (1992).Google Scholar
Aaron, Henry J., Schwartz, William B., “Managed Competition: Little Cost Containment without Budget Limits,” Health Affairs, Supplement (1993): 204–15.Google Scholar
Fielding, Jonathan E., Rice, Thomas, “Can Managed Competition Solve Problems of Market Failure?,” Health Affairs, Supplement (1993): 216–28.Google Scholar
See Ellwood, , Enthoven, , Etheridge, , op. cit., pp. 160, 156.Google Scholar
A question exists whether this “socialization” of costs should be confined to the sponsor itself or carried further to embrace all sponsors in a state, should more than one exist.Google Scholar
Newhouse, Joseph P., “Patients at Risk: Health Reform and Risk Adjustment,” Health Affairs, Spring (1994): 132–46.Google Scholar
Ellwood, , Enthoven, , Etheridge, , op. cit., p. 159.Google Scholar
As Danzon has pointed out, however, these systems may engender hidden costs (for example, long wait times) not properly accounted for in such comparisons. See Danzon, Patricia M., “Hidden Overhead Costs: Is Canada's System Really Less Expensive?,” Health Affairs, Spring (1992): 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
These medical loss ratios are regularly published in the investment analyses of the HMO industry produced by Wall Street firms, such as Salomon Brothers and Goldman Sachs.Google Scholar
Data furnished to the author in a private communication, dated June 21, 1993, with Conway, William A. M.D., Vice President of Operations, Henry Ford Medical Group, Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
Kronick, Richard, Goodman, David C., Wennberg, John, “The Marketplace in Healthcare Reform: Demographic Limitations on Managed Competition,” The New England Journal of Medicine, 328 (1993): 148–52.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Uwe E., “Reflections on the Meaning of Efficiency: Can Efficiency be Separated from Equity?,” Yale Law & Policy Review, 10, no. 2 (1992): at 311.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Tom, “Wernher von Braun,” That Was The Year That Was (San Francisco: Reprise Records, 1965).Google Scholar
For example, the Boeing Corporation with its 747 series, the Lockheed Corporation with its L-1011 TriStar, the McDonnell-Douglas Corporation with its DC-10, and the European Airbus Industry with its A-300 airbus series.Google Scholar
See Enthoven, Alain C., Singer, Sara J., “A Single Payer System in Jackson Hole Clothing,” Health Affairs, Spring (1994): 81–95.Google Scholar