Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:07:46.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civil Rights: Prisoners’ Right to Treatment Information under Pabon v. Wright

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Daniel P. Wilansky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Pabon v. Wright, the Second Circuit held that the Fourteenth Amendment right to refuse medical treatment contained a corollary right to the information necessary to make an informed decision. Plaintiff, William Pabon, was an inmate at Green Haven Correctional Facility in New York (Green Haven). He named two groups of defendants: his doctors and nurses at Green Haven and his doctors at Dutchess Gastroenterologists, P.C. (Dutchess).

In October 1996, a laboratory test indicated that Plaintiff may have contracted Hepatitis C. The Green Haven doctors referred Plaintiff to Dutchess for additional testing, where additional tests confirmed that Plaintiff had Hepatitis C. In July 1997, Plaintiff returned to Dutchess for additional evaluation, and the physicians told him that he must undergo a liver biopsy in order to receive treatment for his condition.

Type
JLME Column
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Winter 2006 , pp. 831 - 832
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20117 (2d Cir. Aug. 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at *6.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at *8.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at *9.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at *10.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
White v. Napoleon, 897 F.2d 103, 113 (3d Cir. 1990) (holding that prisoners “retain a limited right to refuse treatment and a related right to be informed of the proposed treatment and viable alternatives”).Google Scholar
Benson v. Terhune, 304 F.3d 874, 884–885 (9th Cir. 2002).Google Scholar