Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:39:28.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams and Health Care Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Ruth B. Purtilo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to encourage reflection about the harm that could result if the positive aspects of team-organized health care are compromised during the health care reform process. While other models of health care delivery could replace teamwork and serve patients as well or better, the interdisciplinary health care team (IHCT) probably will not be abandoned. However, one or more disciplines whose members play important roles on various teams may be sacrificed in the hasty effort to define essential health care. Moreover, a significant proportion of the types of IHCTs in existence could be rashly eliminated from health plans. These changes should not take place randomly or by default.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , Summer 1994 , pp. 121 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

For a good summary of their development, see Brown, Theodore M., “An Historical View of Health Care Teams,” in Agich, George, ed., Responsibility in Health Care (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1982), pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Nagi, Saad Z., “Teamwork in Health Care in the United States: A Sociological Perspective,” Milbank Mem. Fund Quarterly, 53 (1975): 75–91.Google Scholar
Rothberg, June, “Nurses and Team Practice,” in Lecca, P.J., McNeil, J.S., eds., Interdisciplinary Team Practice, Issues and Trends (New York: Praeger, 1985), pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
Brill, N., Teamwork: Working Together in the Human Services (Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1976).Google Scholar
To set this modern understanding of teamwork into the larger context of interprofessional relationships in health care, see Purtilo, Ruth, “Support and Challenge in Professional Peer Relationships,” in Purtilo, Ruth, Ethical Dimensions in the Health Professions (Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2d ed., 1993), ch. 13. I am grateful to Steven Miles for suggesting the language of “instrumental and moral functions.” It captures aptly the focus of my comments in the above chapter.Google Scholar
For a thorough historical and contemporary treatment of this phenomenon in a collection that includes numerous case studies from many dimensions of health care, see Reiser, Stanley J., Anbar, Michael, eds., The Machine at the Bedside: Strategies for Using Technology in Patient Care (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Many have written on the ways in which reliance on technology has affected health care delivery. For a treatment of this issue from the point of view of its effect on the rehabilitation team, see Purtilo, Ruth, “Rehabilitation and Technology: Ethical Considerations,” International J. of Technol. and Aging, 4, no. 2 (1991): 163–70.Google Scholar
Cassell, Eric, “The Sorcerer's Broom: Medicine's Rampant Technology,” Hastings Center Report, 23 (1993): 32–39.Google Scholar
Shine, Kenneth, president of the Institute of Medicine, made this observation in a presentation entitled “Health Care Reform and Academic Health Centers,” which was given at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, March 15, 1994.Google Scholar
Clinton, Bill, “The Clinton Health Care Plan,” N. Engl. J. Med., 327 (1992): 804–07.Google Scholar
For a discussion of how stresses from the outside can have a deleterious effect on team spirit and function, see Purtilo, Ruth B., Meier, Robert H., “Regulatory Constraints and Patient Empowerment,” J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 72 (1993): 327–30. A portion of the chapter by Cassem, Ned, “Treatment Decisions in Irreversible Illness,” in Hackett, Thomas, Cassem, Edwin H., eds., The Massachusetts General Hospital Handbook of General Hospital Psychiatry (St. Louis: Mosby, 1978), pp. 562-75, is devoted to the effects of team stresses in the intensive care unit.Google Scholar
As one of the architects of the approach, Ellwood, Paul makes this claim in “Outcomes Management: A Technology of Patient Experience,” N. Engl. J. Med., 318 (1988): 1549–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Personal communication with Miles, Steven M.D., March 14, 1994.Google Scholar
The addition of patient satisfaction scales will help to alter this skew in the direction of a higher valuation on moral functions. At present, patient satisfaction scales are imperfectly developed, or are not used at all, in many health services research settings.Google Scholar
For a thorough critique of the major principles that were proposed by the Ethical Foundations Working Group of the Clinton Health Care Task Force, see Gostin, Larry, “Foreword: Health Care Reform in the United States—The Presidential Task Force,” Am. J. of Law & Med., 19, no. 1–2 (1993): 1–7.Google Scholar
Hadorn, David, “The Problem of Discrimination in Health Care Priority Setting,” JAMA, 268 (1992): 1454–59.Google Scholar
This issue seldom is addressed directly, but it can be implied in several themes, most notably those addressing the need for a shift from specialty to primary care and community-oriented practices. For one example that combines both, see Wright, Richard A., “Community-Oriented Primary Care: The Cornerstone of Health Care Reform,” JAMA, 269 (1993): 2544–47.Google Scholar
Emanuel, Ezekiel, Brett, David, “Managed Competition and the Patient-Physician Relationship,” N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (1993): 879–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Arnold M., “The Framework of Heatlh Care Reform,” N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (1993): 1666–76 (italics mine). Dr. Epstein is by no means the only one whose writing suggests this role for outcomes research. I chose to cite him because of his ability to influence policy as one of the domestic policy advisors. The sources are too numerous to list here.Google Scholar
For a debate on the value of enterprise liability, see Peters, J. Douglas, Johnson, Kirk B., “Can Enterprise Liability Ease America's Malpractice Problem?,” ASLME Briefings, no. 8 (1993): 1–3.Google Scholar