Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:58:07.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Health Emergency Legal Preparedness: Legal Practitioner Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Demetrios L. Kouzoukas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper provides an overview of recent US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) initiatives and efforts — under the leadership of the General Counsel, the Secretary, and the President — regarding legal preparedness for public health emergencies. In addressing this topic, the paper focuses on four core elements comprising public health legal preparedness:

  1. (1) effective legal authorities to support necessary public health activities;

  2. (2) competencies of public health professionals to know and then to apply those laws;

  3. (3) coordination of the application of laws across jurisdictions (local, state, tribal, federal, and international) and across multiple sectors; and

  4. (4) information and best practices in public health law.

Type
Special Supplement
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 36 , Issue S1 , Spring 2008 , pp. 18 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Moulton, A. D. Gottfried, R. N. Goodman, R. A. Murphy, A. M., and Rawson, R. D., “What Is Public Health Legal Preparedness?” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31, no. 4 (2003): 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3.Google Scholar
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 1.Google Scholar
Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 201–300 (2007).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Act of May 27, 1796, ch. 31, Stat. 474 (repealed by Act of February 25, 1799, ch. 12, § 1, Stat. 619).Google Scholar
Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006 § 101–406, 42 U.S.C. § 201 (2006).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-148, Div. C, 119 Stat. 2818, 42 U.S.C. § 201 (2007).Google Scholar
Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-148, Div. A, 119 Stat. 2744 (enacted H.R. 2863).Google Scholar
Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 §§ 121–127, 131, 42 U.S.C. § 201 (2007).Google Scholar
Project Bioshield Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-276, 118 Stat. 835 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 41 and 42 U.S.C.)Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 264(e).Google Scholar
New York v. U.S., 505 U.S. 144, 149,112 S.Ct. 2408 (1992).Google Scholar
Control of Communicable Diseases, 70 Fed. Reg. 71892 (proposed Nov. 30, 2005) (to be codified at 42 C.F.R. 70 & 71).Google Scholar
Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1346, 1402, 2671–2680 (2000).Google Scholar
Emergency System for Advance Registration of Volunteer Health Professionals (Ver. 2, June 2005).Google Scholar
See Public Health Service Act, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Boyd, John, Organic Design for Command and Control (May 1987).Google Scholar
Schepin, O. P. Yermakov, W. V., International Quarantine 11 (Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Couch, H. N., “Some Political Implications of the Athenian Plague,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 66 (1935): 92–103, at 92–93, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar