Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:09:50.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anaphoric pronouns: syntax vs. semantics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

I. Warburton  and
N. S. Prabhu
I. Warburton
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading and The British Council, Madras
N. S. Prabhu
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading and The British Council, Madras
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussions
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1972 , pp. 289 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, R. (1969). A theory of pronominal reference. FL 5. 488–519.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1968). Pronouns and reference. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club. (Mimeographed paper.)Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1971). Cross-over phenomena. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar