We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale &Richard Waltereit (eds.), New directions in grammaticalization research (Studies in Language Companion Series 166). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2015. Pp. xv + 302.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
12 February 2016
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think– an English modal particle. In Swan, Toril & Westvik, Olaf Jansen (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning(ed.). 2001. Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 313–339. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2011. I thinkand other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics49, 295–332.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology8, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar