We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bursill-Hall, G. L. (1960). Levels analysis: J. R. Firth's theories of linguistic analysis. Journal of the Canadian Linguistics Association6. 124–135, 164–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934–51. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. & Pike, K. L. (1949). Co-existent phonemic systems. Lg. 25. 29–50.Google Scholar
Langendoen, T. (1964). Review of Studies in Linguistic Analysis, Lg. 40. 305–321.Google Scholar
Langendoen, T. (1968). The London School of Linguistics – A Study of the Linguistic Theories of B. Malinowski and J. R. Firth. Research Monograph no. 46. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joos, M. (ed.) (1958). Readings in Linguistics. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1947). Grammatical prerequisites to phonemic analysis. Word3. 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1952). More on grammatical prerequisites. Word. 8. 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prator, C. H. (1968). The British heresy in TESL. In Fishman, J., Ferguson, C. & Gupta, J. D., Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York: Wiley. 459–476.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1959). Review of Studies in Linguistic Analysis. IJAL25. 254–59.Google Scholar