Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T22:00:10.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fillmore's mysteries and topic vs. comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Petr Sgall
Petr Sgall
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Algebraic Linguistics, Charles University, Prague
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussions
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1972 , pp. 283 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic representation. In Steinberg, D. D. & Jakobovits, L. A. (eds.), Semantics. Cambridge: The University Press. 183–216.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1969). Topic and comment: a study in Russian and general transformational grammar. Slavica Gothoburgensia 4. Göteborg.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1970). Some presuppositions about presuppositions. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Daneš, F. (1967). Order of sentence elements and sentence intonation. In To honor Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton. 499–512.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1970). Subjects, speakers, and roles. Working papers in linguistics 4. Ohio State University. 31–63.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1957). Some thoughts on the function of word order in Old English and Modern English. Sborník Prací Filosofické Fakulty Brněnské University A 5. Brno. 72–98.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1970a). On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Multipl. for the Seminar on the Construction of Complex Grammars, Cambridge, Mass., June 1970. To appear in Sborník Prací Filosofické Fakulty Brněnské University [Publications of the Phil. Faculty of Brno University].Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1970b). On the interplay of means of functional sentence perspective. In Actes du Xe congrès international des linguistes. Bucharest: Acad. Press. 741–743.Google Scholar
Heidolph, K. E. (1966). Kontextbeziehungen zwischen Sätzen in einer generativen Grammatik. Kybernetika 3. 274–281.Google Scholar
Sgall, P. (1967). Functional sentence perspective in a generative description. Prague studies in mathematical linguistics 2. Prague: Academia. 203–225.Google Scholar
Sgall, P. (in prep.). Topic, focus, presuppositions, and the ordering of elements of semantic representations. To appear in Ph P.Google Scholar
Sgall, P. & Hajičová, E. (1970). ‘A functional’ generative description. Prague bulletin of mathematical linguistics 14. 3–38. In Révue roumaine de linguistique 16. 1971.Google Scholar