Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:32:47.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virginia Hill & Alexandru Mardale, The diachrony of differential object marking in Romanian (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 45). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Pp. xiv + 272.

Review products

Virginia Hill & Alexandru Mardale, The diachrony of differential object marking in Romanian (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 45). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Pp. xiv + 272.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2022

MONICA ALEXANDRINA IRIMIA
MONICA ALEXANDRINA IRIMIA*
Affiliation:
Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Antonio Allegri 9, Reggio Emilia, 42121, RE, Italyirimiamo@unimore.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 685 - 690
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21.3, 435–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1985. Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Wanner, Dieter & Kibbee, Douglas A. (eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 143–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1998. Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues d’Europe. In Feuillet, Jack (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 193–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Onea, Edgar & Mardale, Alexandru. 2020. From topic to object: Grammaticalization of differential object marking in Romanian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 65.3, 350–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A. & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena (eds.). 2018. Diachrony of differential argument marking. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar