Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:18:42.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors influencing the stability of the tetragonal form of zirconia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Ramachandra Srinivasan ,
Robert De Angelis  and
Burton H. Davis
Ramachandra Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
Robert De Angelis
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
Burton H. Davis
Affiliation:
Kentucky Center for Energy Research Laboratory, University of Louisville, P. O. Box 13015, Lexington, Kentucky 40512
Get access

Abstract

The pH of the solution that zirconia is precipitated from defines the crystal phase formed after calcination of the material at 400°to 600°C. A metastable tetragonal form is obtained for either low (less than about 5) or high (greater than about 13) pH. The tetragonal phase formed at high pH is much more stable at the calcination temperature than the material obtained at a low pH is. For a material obtained by precipitation at a low pH, monoclinic crystallites, determined by x-ray line broadening, were obtained that were smaller than the tetragonal crystals that produced them. A crystallite size effect, based on x-ray line broadening, is not responsible for the formation or stabilization of the tetragonal phase.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , August 1986 , pp. 583 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Garvie, R.C., “The Occurrence of Metastable Tetragonal Zirconia as a Crystallite Size Effect,” J. Phys. Chem. 69 1238–1243 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Garvie, R. C., “Stabilization of the Tetragonal Structure in Zirconia Microcrystals,” J. Phys. Chem. 82, 218–224 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Garvie, R.C. and Swain, M. V., “Thermodynamics of the Tetragonal to Monoclinic Phase Transformation in Constrained Zirconia Microcrystals,” J. Mater. Sci. 20, 1193–1200 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Bailey, J. E., Lewis, D., Librant, Z. M., and Porter, L. J., “Phase Transformation in Milled Zirconia,” Trans. J. Brit. Ceram. SOC. 71, 25–30 (1965).Google Scholar
5Murase, Y. and Kato, E., “Role of Water Vapor in Crystallite Growth and Tetragonal-Monoclinic Phase Transformation of ZrO,” J. Am. Ceram. SOC. 66, 196–200 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Morgan, P. E. D., “Synthesis of 6nm Ultrafine Monoclinic Zirconia,” J. Am. Ceram. SOC. 67, C-204–205 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Clearfield, A., “Crystalline Hydrous Zirconia,” Inorg. Chem. 3, 146–148 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Livage, J., Doi, K., and Mazieres, C., “Nature and Thermal Evolution of Amorphous Hydrated Zirconium Oxide,” J. Am. Ceram. SOC. 51, 349–353 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Tani, E., Yoshimura, M., and SGmiya, S., “Formation of Ultrafme Tetragonal ZrO, Powder under Hydrothermal Conditions,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 11–14 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Mitsuhashi, T., Ichihara, M., and Tatsuke, V., “Characterization and Stabilization of Metastable Tetragonal ZrO,” J. Am. Ceram. SOC. 57, 97–101 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Torralvo, M. J., Alario, M. A., and Soria, J., “The Glow Phenomenon in Zirconium Oxide,” J. Catal. 86, 473–476 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Osendi, M. I., Moya, J. S., Serna, C. J., and Soria, J., “Metastability of Tetragonal Zirconia Powders,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, 135–139 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Heuer, A. H. and Ruhle, M. “On the Nucleation of the Martensitic Transformation in Zirconia (ZrO),” Acta Metall. 33, 2101–2112 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Chen, I. W. and Chiao, Y. H., “Martensitic Nucleation in ZrO,” Acta Metall. 31, 1627–1638 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Garvie, R. C. and Goss, M. F., “Intrinsic Size Dependence of the Phase Transformation Temperature in Zirconia Microcrystals,” J. Mater. Sci. 21, 1253–1257 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Davis, B. H., “Effect of πH on Crystal Phase of ZrO2 Precipitated from Solution and Calcined at 600 °C,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, C168 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Toraya, H., Yoshimura, M., and SGmiya, S., “Calibration Curve for Quantitative Analysis of Monoclinic-Tetragonal ZrO, System by X-ray Diffraction,” J. Am. Ceram. SOC. 67, C-119–121 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Davis, B.H. (unpublished results).Google Scholar
19Davis, B. H., “Preparation and Adsorptive Properties of Thorium Oxide,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1965.Google Scholar
20Davis, B. H., “Metal Oxide Analogue of Metal Alloy Catalysts,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 19, 200–217 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Ganesan, P. and Davis, B. H., “Catalytic Conversion of Alcohols. XI. Influence of Preparation and Pretreatment on the Selectivityof Zirconia,” Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Dev. 18, 191–196 (1979).Google Scholar
22Blesa, M. A., Moroto, A. J. G., Passaggio, S. I., Figliolia, N. E., and Rigotti, G., “Hydrous Zirconium Oxide: Interfacial Properties, the Formation of Monodisperse Spherical Particles, and its Crystallization at High Temperatures,” J. Mater. Sci. 20, 4601–4609 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar