Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:36:10.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation of stress state and nanohardness via heat treatment of nickel-aluminide multilayer thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2004

Evan A. Sperling*
Affiliation:
Materials Science & Technology, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Peter M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Jennifer L. Hay
Affiliation:
MTS Systems Corporation, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.e-mail: evan.a.sperling@intel.com
Get access

Abstract

Heat treatment of γ-Ni(Al)/γ′-Ni3Al multilayer thin films demonstrates that multilayer hardness correlates with the magnitude of biaxial stress in alternating layers. Films with a columnar grain morphology and (001) texture were fabricated over a range of volume fraction and bilayer thickness via direct current magnetron sputtering onto NaCl (001) substrates at 623 K. The films were removed from substrates, heat-treated at either 673 K or 1073 K in argon, and then mounted for nanoindentation and x-ray diffraction. The biaxial stress state in each phase was furnished from x-ray diffraction measurement of (002) interplanar spacings. The 673 K treatment increases the magnitude of alternating biaxial stress state by 70 to 100% and increases hardness by 25 to 100%, depending on bilayer thickness. In contrast, the 1073 K heat treatment decreases the stress magnitude by 70% and decreases hardness by 50%. The results suggest that the yield strength of these thin films is controlled, in part, by the magnitude of internal stress. Further, thermal treatments are demonstrated to be an effective means to manipulate internal stress.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Wang, W.C. and Singh, R.N.: Influence of the microstructure on the mechanical properties of Ni/Sn multilayered composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 271, 306 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Ramaswamy, V., Phillips, M.A., Nix, W.D. and Clemens, B.M.: Observation of the strengthening of Pt layers in Ni/Pt and Pd/Pt multilayers by in-situ substrate curvature measurement. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 319–321, 887 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Misra, A. and Kung, H.: Deformation behavior of nanostructured metallic multilayers. Adv. Eng. Mater. 3, 217 (2001).3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Josell, D., van Heerdan, D., Shechtman, D. and Read, D.: Mechanical properties of multilayer materials. Nanostruct. Mater. 12, 405 (1999).Google Scholar
5Banerjee, R., Fain, J.P., Anderson, P.M. and Fraser, H.L.: Influence of crystallographic orientation and layer thickness on fracture behavior of Ni/Ni3Al multilayered thin films. Scripta Mater. 44, 2629 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Foecke, T. and Kramer, D.E.: In situ TEM observations of fracture in nanolaminated metallic thin films. International Journal of Fracture 119, 351 (2003).Google Scholar
7Anderson, P.M., Foecke, T. and Hazzledine, P.M.: Dislocation-based deformation mechanisms in metallic nanolaminates. MRS Bull. 24, 27 (1999).Google Scholar
8Kramer, D.E., Savage, M.F., Lin, A. and Foecke, T.: Novel method for TEM characterization of deformation under nanoindents in nanolayered materials. Scripta Mater. 50, 745 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Dehm, G., Balk, T.J., Edongue, H. and Arzt, E.: Small-scale plasticity in thin Cu and Al films. Microelectron. Eng. 70, 412 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Anderson, P.M. and Li, C.: Crack-dislocation modeling of ductile-to-brittle transitions in multilayered materials, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties IV, edited by Townsend, P.H., Weihs, T.P., Sanchez, J.E. Jr., and Borgensen, P., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.308Pittsburgh, PA,1993), p. 731.Google Scholar
11Lamm, A.V. and Anderson, P.M.: Yield maps for nanoscale metallic multilayers. Scripta Mater. 50, 757 (2004).Google Scholar
12Li, Q. and Anderson, P.M.: Dislocation confinement and ultimate strength in nanoscale metallic multilayers, in Mechanical Properties of Nanostructured Materials and Nanocomposites, edited by Ovid’ko, I., Pande, C.S., Krishnamoorti, R., Lavernia, E., and Skandan, G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.791Warrendale, PA,2004) pp.131–136.Google Scholar
13Hoagland, R.G., Mitchell, T.E., Hirth, J.P. and Kung, H.: On the strengthening effects of interfaces in multilayer FCC metallic composites. Philos. Mag. A 82, 643 (2002).Google Scholar
14Banerjee, R. M.S. Thesis, Ohio State University (1997).Google Scholar
15Thompson, G.B. M.S. Thesis, Ohio State University (1998).Google Scholar
16Fain, J.P. M.S. Thesis, Ohio State University (1999).Google Scholar
17Thompson, G.B., Banerjee, R., Zhang, X.D., Anderson, P.M. and Fraser, H.L.: Chemical ordering and texture in Ni-25 at% Al thin films. Acta Mater. 50, 643 (2002).Google Scholar
18Sperling, E.A., Banerjee, R., Thompson, G.B. and Fain, J.P.: Processing and microstructural characterization of sputter-deposited Ni/Ni3Al multilayered thin films. J. Mater. Res. 18, 979 (2003).Google Scholar
19Thompson, C.V.: Structure evolution during processing of polycrystalline films. Ann. Rev. of Mater. Sci. 30, 159 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Sridhar, N., Rickman, J.M. and Srolovitz, D.J.: Multilayer film stability. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 4852 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Snyder, R.L. and Jenkins, R.: Introduction to Powder X-Ray Diffraction (John Wiley & Sons, New York,1996).Google Scholar
22Hay, J.L. and Pharr, G.M. in ASM Handbook Volume 8: Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, edited by Kuhn, H. and D. Medlin. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH,2000), p. 232.Google Scholar
23Barshilia, H.C. and Rajam, K.S.: Characterization of Cu/Ni multilayer coatings by nanoindentation and atomic force microscopy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 155, 195 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24McKeown, J., Misra, A., Kung, H., Hoagland, R.G. and Nastasi, M.: Microstructures and strength of nanoscale Cu-Ag multilayers. Scripta Mater. 46, 593 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Saha, R. and Nix, W.D.: Effects of the substrate on the determination of thin film mechanical properties by nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 50, 23 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Joslin, D.L. and Oliver, W.C.: A new method for analyzing data from continuous depth-sensing microindentation tests. J. Mater. Res. 5, 123 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Yoder, K.B., Stone, D.S., Hoffman, R.A. and Lin, J.C.: Elastic rebound between an indenter and a layered specimen: Part II. Using contact stiffness to help ensure reliability of nanoindentation measurements. J. Mater. Res. 13, 3214 (1998).Google Scholar
28Li, Q. and Anderson, P.M.: Dislocation-based modeling of the mechanical behavior of epitaxial metallic multilayer thin films (submitted).Google Scholar
29Lamm, A.V. and Anderson, P.M. in Processing and Properties of Structural Nanomaterials, edited by Shaw, L.L., Suryanarayana, C., and Mishra, R.S. (TMS, Warrendale, PA,2003), pp. 2734.Google Scholar
30Villars, P., Calvert, L.D. and editors, : Pearson’s Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases (ASM International, Materials Park, OH,1996).Google Scholar
31Rao, P.V.M., Suryanarayana, S.V., Murthy, K.S. and Naidu, S.V.N.: The high-temperature thermal-expansion of Ni3Al measured by x-ray-diffraction and dilation methods. J. Phys: Condens. Matter. 1, 5357 (1989).Google Scholar
32Pettifor, D.G.: Theoretical predictions of structure and related properties of intermetallics. Materials Science and Technology Ser. 8, 345 (1992).Google Scholar
33Fain, J.P., Banerjee, R., Josell, D., Anderson, P.M., Fraser, H.L., Tymiak, N. and Gerberich, W.: Morphological stability of Ni(Al)/Ni3Al nanolaminate composites, in Nanophase and Nanocomposite Materials III, edited by Komarnen;, S.Parker, J.C., and Hahn, H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.581Warrendale, PA,2000), pp. 603608.Google Scholar