Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:05:36.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Mechanical Pressure and Temperature on the Chemical Interaction Between Steel and Silicon Nitride Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. Kalin ,
J. Vižintin ,
J. Vleugels  and
O. Van Der Biest
M. Kalin
Affiliation:
Center for Tribology and Technical Diagnostics, University of Ljubljana, Bogišičeva 8, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
J. Vižintin
Affiliation:
Center for Tribology and Technical Diagnostics, University of Ljubljana, Bogišičeva 8, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
J. Vleugels
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, De Croylaan 2, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
O. Van Der Biest
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, De Croylaan 2, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The chemical interaction between a Si3N4 ceramic, with Al2O3 and MgO sintering additives, and DIN 100Cr6 steel was studied by means of static interaction couple experiments between 500 and 1200 °C. At 500 °C, the ceramic was chemically stable in contact with the steel. In the temperature range between 700 and 1100 °C, the silicon nitride dissociated in contact with the steel. The Si dissolved and diffused into the steel, whereas a nitrogen pressure built up in the micropores at the interface, limiting and inhibiting the reaction rate. The strength of the obtained interfacial bond was too low to withstand the residual stresses formed during cooling, and therefore, the interaction couples fell apart during cooling. Above 1100 °C, the nitrogen also dissolved and diffused into the steel, enhancing the overall rate of interaction. A strong interface was formed, resulting in a well-defined interaction layer on the ceramic side of the interaction couple. The mechanical pressures on the interaction couples were adjusted to study the influence of plastic deformation of the steel on the chemical interaction. Higher contact pressures resulted in more homogeneous and uniform interaction layers. The reactivity of plastically and elastically deforming steel, however, was found to be the same.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , June 2000 , pp. 1367 - 1376
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Chudecki, J.F., Ceram. Bull. 69, 1113 (1990).Google Scholar
2.Heinrich, G.J. and Kruner, H., in Tailoring of Mechanical Properties of Silicon Nitride, edited by Hoffmann, M.J. and Petzow, G. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994), p. 19.Google Scholar
3.Kawamura, H., in Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Ceramic Materials and Components for Engines, edited by Niihara, K., Kanazaki, S., Komeya, K., Hirano, S., and Morinaga, K. (Technoplaza, Japan, 1998), p. 5.Google Scholar
4.Jahanmir, S., Friction and Wear of Ceramics (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994), p. 3.Google Scholar
5.Fischer, T.E. and Tomizawa, H., Wear 10, 29 (1985).Google Scholar
6.Melandri, C., Gee, M.G., de Portu, G., and Guicciardi, S., Tribol. Int. 28, 403 (1995).Google Scholar
7.Dong, S.P., Danyluk, S., and McNallan, J.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 3033 (1992).Google Scholar
8.Dong, X. and Jahanmir, S., Wear 165, 169 (1993).Google Scholar
9.Vižintin, J., Kalin, M., Novak, S., Dražicĉ, G., Ives, L.K., and Peterson, M.B., Wear 192, 11 (1996).Google Scholar
10.Kalin, M., Vižintin, J., and Novak, S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 220, 191 (1996).Google Scholar
11.Kalin, M., Fretting Wear Mechanisms in Contact of Steel and Silicon Nitride Ceramics (Centre for tribology and technical diagnostics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1999), pp. 86, 120, 130.Google Scholar
12.Novak, S., Dražicĉ, G., Kalin, M., and Vižintin, J., Wear 225–229, 1276 (1999).Google Scholar
13.Heikinheimo, E., Isomaki, I., Kodentsov, A.A., and van Loo, F.J.J., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 17, 25 (1997).Google Scholar
14.Oliveira, F.J., Silva, R.F., and Vieira, J.M., in Key Engineering Materials (Trans Tech Publications, Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1997), Vol. 132–136, p. 2068.Google Scholar
15.Vleugels, J., Laoui, T., Vercammen, K., Celis, J.P., and Van der Biest, O., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 187, 177 (1994).Google Scholar
16.Vleugels, J., Vandeperre, L., and Van Der Biest, O., J. Mater. Res. 11, 1265 (1996).Google Scholar
17.Silva, R.F., Oliveira, F.J., Castro, F.P., and Vieira, J.M., Acta Mater. 46, 2501 (1998).Google Scholar
18.Stoop, B.T.J and Den Ouden, G., Met. Trans. A 24, 1835 (1993).Google Scholar
19.Vleugels, J. and Van Der Biest, O., Advanced Ceramic Tools for Machining Application III, Key Engineering Materials Vols. 138–140, edited by Low, I.M. (Trans Tech Publications, Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1998), p. 127.Google Scholar
20.Suganuma, A., Miyamoto, Y., and Koizumi, M., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 18, 47 (1988).Google Scholar
21.Schuster, J.C. and Weitzer, F., J. Solid State Chem. 70, 178 (1987).Google Scholar
22.Kaufman, L., Calphad 3, 275 (1979).Google Scholar
23.Kumar, H.K.C, Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology (1991).Google Scholar
24.Oliveira, F.J., Silva, R.F., and Vieira, J.M., in Proceedings of the CIMTEC '98, edited by Vincenzini, P. (Techna Srl, Faenza, 1999), p. 947.Google Scholar
25.Wriedt, H.A. and Gonzalez, O.D., Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 221, 532 (1961).Google Scholar
26.Cottenden, A.M. and Almond, E.A., Met. Technol. June, 221 (1981).Google Scholar
27.Kramer, B.M. and Suh, N.P., Trans. ASME 102, 303 (1980).Google Scholar