Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:22:46.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical and electrical conductivity investigations of Fe3+-(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) terpolymer complex systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

N.A. Bakr
Affiliation:
Polymer Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
M.I. Abdel-hamid
Affiliation:
Polymer Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Get access

Abstract

Infrared (IR) and UV-spectra have been obtained for pure and Fe3+ doped acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) terpolymer. IR study revealed the appearance of a new band at about 380 cm−1, and a change of the shape and the intensity of the band at 1450–1500 cm−1 and 2240 cm−1 indicates the structural change on blending due to the τ-complexes and the complexes of the functional groups with Fe3+ forming an ion-coordination polymer. The UV spectrum confirms this result. The optical energy for pure and Fe3+-doped ABS is found to be 3.75 eV and 3.55 eV, respectively. The dc and ac electrical conductivities have been investigated. The apparent conductivity of high Fe3+-doped ABS at the ambient temperature is about six orders of magnitude greater than that of the undoped film. The activation energy drastically decreases as the wt. % of FeCl3 increases. The enhanced conductivity in the complex film may be attributed to the capacity of the dopant to give additional charge carriers. Transport of charge carriers will occur by hopping of charge carriers between close neighbors across the intervening dielectric, probably via a thermally activated process.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Hassan, E. A., Plastic Technol. 6, 67 (1981).Google Scholar
2Chen, Ten-Ming and Hu, Y. H., Physica C 185, 481 (1991).Google Scholar
3Migahed, M. D., El-Khodary, A., Hammam, M., Shaban, A., and Hafiz, H. R., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 2795 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Clark, R. J. H., J. Chem. Soc. 1377 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Migahed, M. D., Tawansi, A., and Bakr, N. A., Eur. J. Polym. 18, 975 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Migahed, M. D., Reicha, F. M., Ishra, M., and El-Nimr, M., J. Mater. Sci.: Mater, in Electronics 2, 146 (1991).Google Scholar
7Wooten, F., Optical Properties of Solids (Academic Press, New York, 1972), Chap. 3.Google Scholar
8Migahed, M. D. and Bakr, N. A., J. Polym. Mater. 11, 129 (1994).Google Scholar
9Ishikawa, H., Xu, X., Kobayashi, A., Sato, M., Suzuki, M., and Haegawa, E., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 25, 897 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Otsu, T., Kinishita, Y., and Nakamachi, A., Makromol. Chem. 155, 575 (1968).Google Scholar
11Ratner, M. A. and Shriver, D. F., Chem. Rev. 88, 109 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Kise, H., Sugihara, M., and He, F. F., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 30, 1133 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Sharma, A. K. and Ramu, C. H., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 10, 1217 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar