Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T21:42:19.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photon emission as a probe of chaotic processes accompanying fracture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S. C. Langford
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164–2814
Ma Zhenyi
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164–2814
J. T. Dickinson
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164–2814
Get access

Abstract

Photon emission accompanying the fracture of an epoxy and single crystal MgO is examined for evidence of deterministic chaos by means of the autocorrelation function, the Fourier transform, the correlation integral of Grassberger and Procaccia, and the fractal box dimension. A positive Lyapunov exponent is also obtained from the epoxy phE data. Each of these measures is consistent with a significant degree of deterministic chaos associated with attractors of relatively low dimension. A typical epoxy fracture surface was analyzed for fractal character by means of the slit island technique, yielding a fractal dimension of 1.32 ± 0.03. The fractal dimensions of the fracture surface and the photon emission data (box dimension) of the epoxy are in good agreement. These observations suggest that fluctuations in photon emission intensity during fracture reflect the production of fractal surface features as they are being produced and thus provide important information on the process of dynamic crack growth.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Dickinson, j. T. and Jensen, L. C., to appear in ASTM Proceedings for the 13th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Los Angelos, 913 November, 1987.Google Scholar
2Dickinson, J. T., Jensen, L. C., and Jahan-Latibari, A., J. Vac. Sci. Tech-nol. A 2, 1112 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Dickinson, J. T. and Crasto, A. S., in Cross-linked Polymers: Chemistry, Properties, and Applications, edited by Dickie, R. A., Labana, S. S., and Bauer, R. S. (American Chemical Society, 1988), pp. 145168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Dickinson, J.T., Jensen, L. C., and Bhattacharya, S.K., Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp. 7, 129 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Langford, S.C., Dickinson, J.T., and Jensen, L. C., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1437 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Mandelbrot, B.B., Passoja, D. E., and Paullay, A. J., Nature 308, 721 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Mecholsky, J.J., Passoja, D.E., and Feinberg-Ringel, K. S., J. Am. Ce-ram. Soc. 72, 60 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Mecholsky, J. J., Mackin, T. J., and Passoja, D.E., in Fractography of Glasses and Ceramics, edited by Varner, J. R. and Frechette, V. D. (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1988), p. 127.Google Scholar
9Underwood, E. R. and Banerji, Kingshuk, Mater. Sci. and Eng. 80, 1 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Passoja, D. E., in Fractography of Glasses and Ceramics, edited by Varner, J. R. and Frechette, V. D. (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1988), p. 101.Google Scholar
11Markworth, A.J. and McCoy, J. K., J. Mater. Res. 3, 675 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Louis, E. and Guinea, F., Europhys. Lett. 3, 871 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Hara, Hiroaki and Okayama, Seiji, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9504 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Packard, N.H., Crutchfield, J.P., Farmer, J.D., and Shaw, R. S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 712 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Mandelbrot, B.B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W. H. Freeman, New York, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Mandelbrot, B. B. and Voss, R. F., in Noise in Physical Systems and 1 If Noise, edited by Savelli, M., Lecoy, G., and Nougier, J-P. (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1983), p. 31.Google Scholar
17Mandelbrot, B. B., Physica Scripta 32, 257 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Dempsey, J. P. and Burgers, P., Int. J. Fracture 27, 203 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Ravi-Chandar, K. and Knauss, W. G., Int. J. Fracture 26, 141 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Broomhead, D. S. and King, G. P., Physics 20D, 217 (1986).Google Scholar
21Grassberger, Peter and Procaccia, Itamar, Physica 9D, 189 (1983).Google Scholar
22Kurths, J. and Herzel, H., Physica 25D, 165 (1987).Google Scholar
23Ben-Mizrachi, Avraham and Procaccia, Itamar, Phys. Rev. A 29, 975 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Berg é, Pierre, Pomeau, Yves, and Vidal, Christian, Order within Chaos (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
25Takens, F., in Lecture Notes in Mathematics, edited by Rand, D. A. and Young, L. S. (Springer, Berlin, 1981), p. 366.Google Scholar
26Whitney, H., Annals of Math. 45, 220 (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Crutchfield, J. P. and McNamara, B. S., Complex Systems 1, 417 (1987).Google Scholar
28Wolf, Alan, Swift, J.B., Swinney, H.L., and Vastano, J.A., Physica 16D, 285 (1985).Google Scholar
29Meakin, Paul, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by Domb, C. and Lebowitz, J. L. (Academic Press, London, 1988), Vol. 12, p. 335.Google Scholar