Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T00:05:05.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural, microstructural, transport, and magnetotransport properties of nanostructured La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 manganites synthesized by coprecipitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

D.G. Kuberkar*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Saurashtra University, Rajkot - 360 005, India
N.A. Shah
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Saurashtra University, Rajkot - 360 005, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: dgkuberkar@rediffmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The structural, transport, and magnetotransport properties of single-phase, homogeneous nanostructured La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO) manganites synthesized by the coprecipitation route were investigated and the effect of sintering temperature on the microstructure of LSMO compounds was studied. A strong dependence of transport and magnetotransport behavior on the microstructure and nature of grain boundaries has been observed in the single-phase LSMO sintered at various temperatures. High-field magnetoresistance (HFMR) at room temperature is found to increase [13% (LS6) to 25% (LS9)] while low temperature (5 K) magnetoresistance decreases [75% (LS6) to 46% (LS9)] under 9 T field with increase in sintering temperature, which has been attributed to the spin-polarized tunneling and spin-dependent scattering of charge carriers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Daughton, J.M.GMR applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192, 334 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Haghiri-Gosnet, A.M., Renard, J.P.CMR manganites: Physics, thin films and devices. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36, R127 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Zener, C.Interaction between the d shells in the transition metals. Phys. Rev. 81, 440 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Millis, A.J., Littlewood, P.B., Shraiman, B.I.Double exchange alone does not explain the resistivity of La1–xSrxMnO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5144 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Dagotto, E., Hotta, T., Moreo, A.Colossal magnetoresistance materials: The key role of phase separation. Phys. Rep. 344, 1 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Schiffer, P., Ramirez, A.P., Bao, W., Cheong, S.W.Low temperature magnetoresistance and the magnetic phase diagram of La1–xCaxMnO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3336 (1995)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Mahesh, R., Mahendiran, R., Raychaudhuri, A.K., Rao, C.N.R.Effect of particle size on the giant magnetoresistance of La0.7Ca0.3 MnO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2291 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hwang, H.Y., Cheong, S.W., Ong, N.P., Batlogg, B.Spin polarized intergrain tunneling in La2/3Sr1/3MnO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2041 (1996)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Vazquez-Vazquez, C., Blanco, M.C., Lopez-Quintela, M.A., Sanchez, R.D., Rivas, J., Oseroff, S.B.Characterization of La0.67Ca0.33MnO3±δ particles prepared by the sol-gel route. J. Mater. Chem. 8, 991 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Gupta, A., Sun, J.Z.Spin polarized transport and magnetoresistance in magnetic oxides. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 24 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar