Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T04:33:00.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis of open-cell metal foams by templated directed vapor deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Douglas T. Queheillalt ,
Derek D. Hass ,
David J. Sypeck  and
Haydn N. G. Wadley
Douglas T. Queheillalt
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904
Derek D. Hass
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904
David J. Sypeck
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904
Haydn N. G. Wadley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904
Get access

Abstract

Low-density, open-cell nickel base superalloy foams have been synthesized by a high-rate, electron beam-directed vapor deposition process and their mechanical properties evaluated. The deposition process uses an open-cell polymer foam template upon which is deposited a metal alloy coating. The electron beam evaporated flux was entrained in a rarefied transonic gas jet and propagated along the flow stream lines through the polymer structure. After vapor deposition, the polymer template was removed by low-temperature thermal decomposition. The resultant ultralightweight metal foams consisted of a three-dimensional open cell, reticulated structure possessing hollow triangular ligaments with relative densities of <3%. Their mechanical integrity was increased by either pressureless or transient liquid phase sintering. The mechanical properties of these ultralightweight metal foams were comparable to theoretical predictions for open-cell, reticulated foams.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , April 2001 , pp. 1028 - 1036
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Ashby, M.F., Evans, A.G., Fleck, N.A., Gibson, L.J., Hutchinson, J.W., and Wadley, H.N.G., Metal Foams: A Design Guide (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, U.K., 2000).Google Scholar
2.Ashby, M.F., Metall. Trans. A, 14, 1755 (1983).Google Scholar
3.Gibson, L.J., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 110, 1 (1989).Google Scholar
4.Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F., Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1997).Google Scholar
5.Evans, A.G., Hutchinson, J.W., and Ashby, M.F., Prog. Mater. Sci. 43, 171 (1998).Google Scholar
6.Evans, A.G., Hutchinson, J.W., and Ashby, M.F., Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 3, 288 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lu, T.J. and Chen, C., Acta Mater. 47, 1469 (1999).Google Scholar
8.Wang, X. and Lu, T.J., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 756 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Lu, T.J., Hess, A., and Ashby, M.F., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 7528 (1999).Google Scholar
10.Lu, T.J., Stone, H.A., and Ashby, M.F., Acta Mater 46, 3619 (1998).Google Scholar
11.Lu, T.J., Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 42, 2031 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Walz, D.D., Method of Making an Inorganic Reticulated Foam Structure, U.S. Patent 3 616 841 (2 November 1971).Google Scholar
13.Brannan, J.R., Bean, A.S., Vaccaro, A.J., and Stewart, J.J., Continuous Electroplating of Conductive Foams, U.S. Patent 4 978 431 (18 December 1990).Google Scholar
14.Brannan, J.R., Bean, A.S., Vaccaro, A.J., and Stewart, J.J., Continuous Electroplating of Conductive Foams, U.S. Patent 5 098 544 (24 March 1992).Google Scholar
15.Brannan, J.R., Vaccaro, A.J., and Healy, J.P., High Density, High Capacity Battery Electrode, U.S. Patent 5 374 491 (20 December 1994).Google Scholar
16.Pruyn, W.A., Metal Foam, U.S. Patent 5 503 941 (2 April 1996).Google Scholar
17.Pruyn, W.A., Method for the Production of a Metal Foam, U.S. Patent 5 584 983 (17 December 1996).Google Scholar
18.Vaccaro, A.J., Gregg, J.S., Gibbons, D.W., Brannan, J.R., Pohto, G.R., and Hinden, J.M., Continuously Electroplated Foam of Improved Weight Distribution, U.S. Patent 5 804 053 (8 September 1998).Google Scholar
19.Clyde, R.A., Method of Plating Metal Uniformly on and Throughout Porous Structures, U.S. Patent 3 900 646 (19 August 1975).Google Scholar
20.Babjak, J., Ettel, V.A., and Paserin, V., Method of Forming Nickel Foam, U.S. Patent 4 957 543 (18 September 1990).Google Scholar
21.Kaplan, R.B., Pierson, H.O., Tuffias, R.H., and Williams, B.E., High Temperature Resistant Reticulated Foam Structures and Process, U.S. Patent 5 154 970 (13 October 1992).Google Scholar
22.Perugini, G. and Marcaccioli, E., Process for the Preparation of Metallic and/or Metal-Ceramic and/or Ceramic Sponges, U.S. Patent 4 076 888 (28 February 1978).Google Scholar
23.Pinkhasov, E., Method of Making Open Pore Structures, U.S. Patent 4 975 230 (4 December 1990).Google Scholar
24.Pinkhasov, E., Method of Making Open Pore Structures, U.S. Patent 5 011 638 (30 April 1991).Google Scholar
25.Schiller, S., Heisig, U., and Panzer, S., Electron Beam Technology (Verlag Technik, GmbH, Berlin, Germany, 1995).Google Scholar
26.Groves, J.F. and Wadley, H.N.G., Composites B 28, 57 (1997).Google Scholar
27.Hass, D.D., Wadley, H.N.G., and Parrish, P.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 183 (1998).Google Scholar
28.Groves, J.F., Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Virginia (1998).Google Scholar
29.Wadley, H.N.G. and Groves, J.F., Directed Vapor Deposition of Electron Beam Evaporant, U.S. Patent 5 534 314 (9 July 1996).Google Scholar
30. INCO Alloys International Inc., Product Data Sheet (1994).Google Scholar
31.Kohl, H.K. and Peng, K., J. Nucl. Mater. 101, 243 (1981).Google Scholar
32.Dey, G.K., Albert, S., Srivastava, D., Sundararaman, M., and Mukhopadhyay, P., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 119, 175 (1989).Google Scholar
33.Cushnie, K.K. and Campbell, S.T., Process for Removal of Polymer Foams from Nickel-Coated Substrates, U.S. Patent 5 735 977 (7 April 1998).Google Scholar
34.Movchan, B.A and Demchishin, A.V., Phys. Met. Metallogr. 28, 83 (1969).Google Scholar
35.Sanders, J.V., in Chemisorption and Reacting on Metal Film, edited by Anderson, J.R. (Academic Press, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
36.Thornton, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11, 666 (1974).Google Scholar
37.Thornton, K.A., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 7, 239 (1977).Google Scholar
38.Yang, Y.G., Johnson, R.A., and Wadley, H.N.G., Acta Mater. 45, 1455 (1997).Google Scholar
39.Howe, J.M., Interfaces in Materials: atomic structure, thermodynamics and kinetic of solidvapor, solidliquid and solidsolid interfaces (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997).Google Scholar
40.Cahn, J.W. and Hilliard, J.E., J. Chem. Phy. 28, 258 (1958).Google Scholar
41.German, R.M., Powder Metallurgy Science (Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1984).Google Scholar
42.German, R.M., Liquid Phase Sintering (Plenum Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
43. Powder Diffraction File, Card No. 4–850, International Center for Diffraction Data (1993).Google Scholar
44.Simone, A.E. and Gibson, L.J., Acta Mater. 46, 3929 (1998).Google Scholar
45.Grenestedt, J.L., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46, 29 (1998).Google Scholar
46.Gradinger, R. and Rammerstorfer, F.G., Acta Mater. 47, 143 (1999).Google Scholar