Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:09:42.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New material of Gilmoremys lancensis nov. comb. (Testudines: Trionychidae) from the Hell Creek Formation and the diagnosis of plastomenid turtles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Walter G. Joyce  and
Tyler R. Lyson
Walter G. Joyce
Affiliation:
1Institut für Geowissenschaften, University of Tübingen, Sigwartstraße 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany, 2Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, 170 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
Tyler R. Lyson
Affiliation:
3Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, 210 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA, 4Marmarth Research Foundation, Marmarth, ND 58643, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plastomenidae is a poorly diagnosed clade of extinct soft-shelled turtles (Trionychidae) known from the Campanian to Eocene of North America. Five skulls, a mandible, two carapaces, and numerous plastral remains from the Hell Creek Formation (Late Cretaceous, Maastrichtian) of North Dakota and Montana are referable to Gilmoremys lancensis nov. comb., a taxon previously known from a carapace and xiphiplastron only. Gilmoremys lancensis is diagnosed by a carapace that is covered by elongate sinusoidal grooves, distally expanded second costals, hyoplastral shoulders, an extensive secondary palate with accessory ridges, an extremely elongate mandible, a contribution of the parietal to the wall of the orbit, and a posterior ossified narial canal. A phylogenetic analysis of all well-known plastomenid turtles establishes Gilmoremys lancensis as the most basal known plastomenid and reveals that cranial characters are more reliable in diagnosing plastomenid turtles, in particular the contribution of the parietal to the orbit wall and the extensive secondary palate. All plastomenid turtles with a locked entoplastron are placed in Hutchemys. Assuming that all taxa are monophyletic, the phylogenetic analysis implies that the G. lancensis lineage is the only one to go extinct at the K/T boundary, whereas the four remaining plastomenid lineages survive. Extensive ghost ranges are nevertheless apparent. Taphonomic considerations indicate that G. lancensis was a riverine turtle, whereas more derived plastomenids preferred swampy habitats.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 85 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 442 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, P. W. 1967. The cranial arteries and cranial arterial foramina of the turtle genera Chrysemys, Sternotherus, and Trionyx: a comparative study with analysis of possible evolutionary implications. Tulane Studies Zoology, 14:81–99.Google Scholar
Batsch, A. J. G. C. 1788. Versuch einer Anleitung, zur Kenntniß und Geschichte der Thiere und Mineralien. Akademische Buchhandlung, Jena.Google Scholar
Brinkman, D. B. 2005. Turtles: diversity, paleoecology, and distribution, p. 202–220. In Currie, P. J. and Koppelhus, E. B. (eds.), Dinosaur Provincial Park: A spectacular ancient ecosystem revealed. Indiana University Press, Bloomingdale.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1868. On the origin of genera. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1868:242–300.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1871. Descriptions of some new vertebrata from the Bridger Group of the Eocene. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 12:460–465.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1872. Descriptions of some new Vertebrata from the Bridger group of the Eocene. Palaeontological Bulletin, 1:1–6.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, G. H. 1977. Intraspecific variation in the cranial feeding mechanism of turtles of the genus Trionyx (Reptilia, Testudines, Trionychidae). Journal of Herpetology, 11:255–285.Google Scholar
Engstrom, T. N., Shaffer, H. B., and McCord, W. P. 2004. Multiple data sets, high homoplasy, and the phylogeny of softshell turtles (Testudines: Trionychidae). Systematic Biology, 53:693–710.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39:783–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaffney, E. S. 1972. The systematics of the North American family Baenidae (Reptilia, Cryptodira). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 147:241–320.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1979. Comparative cranial morphology of recent and fossil turtles. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 164:65–376.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. W. 1923. A new species of Aspideretes from the Belly River Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 17:1–10.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. W. 1928. Description of two new species of fossil turtles, from the Lance Formation of Wyoming. Proceedings of the US National Museum, 50:641–646.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1825. A synopsis of the genera of reptiles and amphibia, with a description of some new species. Annals of Philosophy, 10:193–217.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. 1907. Description of seven new species of turtles from the Tertiary of the United States. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 23:847–863.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. 1908. The fossil turtles of North America. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 75:1–568.Google Scholar
Hillis, D. M. and Bull, J. J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology, 42:182–192.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H. 2009. New soft-shelled turtles (Plastomeninae, Trionychidae, Testudines) from the Late Cretaceous and Paleocene of North America. PaleoBios, 29:36–47.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H. and Archibald, J. D. 1986. Diversity of turtles across the Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary in northeastern Montana. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 55:1–22.Google Scholar
Joyce, W. G. and Lyson, T. R. 2010. A neglected lineage of North American turtles fills a major gap in the fossil record. Palaeontology, 53:241–248.Google Scholar
Joyce, W. G., Revan, A., Lyson, T. R., and Danilov, I. G. 2009. Two new plastomenine softshell turtles from the Paleocene of Montana. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, 50:307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyson, T. R. and Joyce, W. G. 2009a. A new species of Palatobaena (Testudines: Baenidae) and a maximum parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Baenidae. Journal of Paleontology, 83:457–470.Google Scholar
Lyson, T. R. and Joyce, W. G. 2009b. A revision of Plesiobaena (Testudines: Baenidae) and an assessment of baenid ecology across the K/T boundary. Journal of Paleontology, 83:833–853.Google Scholar
Lyson, T. R. and Joyce, W. G. 2010. A new baenid turtle from the Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Hell Creek Formation of North Dakota and a preliminary taxonomic revision of Cretaceous Baenidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 30:394–402.Google Scholar
Lyson, T. R. and Joyce, W. G. 2011. Cranial anatomy and phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic turtle. Compsemys victa, Leidy, 1856. Journal of Paleontology, 85, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meylan, P. A. 1987. The phylogenetic relationships of softshelled turtles (Family Trionychidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 186:1–101.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar