Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:02:04.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reclassification of vertebrate trackways from the Permian of Scotland and related forms from Arizona and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Patrick J. McKeever  and
Hartmut Haubold
Patrick J. McKeever
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Northern Ireland, 20 College Gardens, Belfast BT9 6BS, Ireland
Hartmut Haubold
Affiliation:
Institut für Geologische Wissenschaften und Geiseltalmuseum, Martin-Luther Universität, D-06099, Halle, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The large number of ichnospecies in Permian vertebrate ichnology literature is often a result of a failure to recognize substrate or gait-controlled variations in trackway morphology. Additionally, regional studies were often performed in isolation from studies in other areas. Nomenclatural priority applies to the names first assigned to trackways from the Corncockle and Locharbriggs Sandstone Formations (Permian) of Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland. Only one ichnogenus, Chelichnus, and four ichnospecies are recognized here and all had been identified in the studies of Jardine in 1850 and 1853. Chelichnus represents tetrapod trackways with rounded manus and pes impressions, subequal in size with up to 5 short digits where preservation is complete. The normal trackway pattern shows a pes pace angulation of up to 90° with the manus and pes being impressed close together or possibly with a slight overlap of the manus by the pes. Chelichnus bucklandi shows a pes size of 10 to 25 mm, C. duncani shows a pes size of 25 to 75 mm, C. gigas shows a pes size of 75 to 125 mm, and C. titan displays a pes size exceeding 125 mm in length. This restriction to four ichnospecies is more in accord with the low faunal diversity to be expected from an eolian environment of Late Permian age than was the former taxonomic classification. The Permian ichnofaunas of the Coconino Sandstone of Arizona and the Cornberger Sandstein of Germany are also composed largely of these four ichnospecies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 6 , November 1996 , pp. 1011 - 1022
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brookfield, M. E. 1978. Stratigraphy of the Permian and supposed Permian rocks of southern Scotland. Geologische Rundschau, 67:110–149.Google Scholar
Delair, J. B. 1966. Fossil footprints from Dumfriesshire, with descriptions of new forms from Annandale. Transactions of the Dumfries and Galloway Natural History and Antiquities Society, 43:14–30.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, P. 1878. Note on a new fossil footprint from the Permian sandstone of Dumfriesshire. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 9:154–155.Google Scholar
Duncan, H. 1831. An account of the tracks and footmarks of animals found impressed on sandstone in the quarry of Corncockle Muir, in Dumfriesshire. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 11:194–209.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. W. 1926. Fossil footprints from the Grand Canyon. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 77, 41 p.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. W. 1927. Fossil footprints from the Grand Canyon: second contribution. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 80, 78 p.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. W. 1928. Fossil footprints from the Grand Canyon: third contribution. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 80, 16 p.Google Scholar
Grierson, J. 1828. On footsteps before the flood, in a specimen of red sandstone. Edinburgh Journal of Science, 8:130–134.Google Scholar
Harkness, R. 1850. On the position of the impressions of footsteps in the Bunter Sandstone of Dumfriesshire. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6:203–208.Google Scholar
Harkness, R. 1851. Notice of some new footsteps in the Bunter Sandstone of Dumfriesshire. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 8:90–95.Google Scholar
Haubold, H. 1971. Ichnia amphibiorum et Reptiliorum fossilium. In Kuhn, O. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie No. 18, p. 1–122. Fisher-Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Haubold, H. 1984. Saurierfahrten: A Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt DDR, 231 p.Google Scholar
Hickling, G. 1909. British Permian footprints. Memoirs of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 53:1–30.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1877. The crocodilian remains found in the Elgin sandstones with remarks on the ichnites of Cummingstone. Memoir of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom, Monograph No. 3, 52 p.Google Scholar
Jardine, W. 1850. Note to Mr. Harkness's Paper “On the position of the Impressions of Footsteps in the Bunter Sandstones of Dumfriesshire.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6:208–209.Google Scholar
Jardine, W. 1853. The ichnology of Annandale, or illustrations of footmarks impressed on the New Red Sandstone of Corncockle Muir. Edinburgh, 17 p.Google Scholar
Lockley, M. G., Hunt, A. P., and Meyer, C. A. 1994. Vertebrate traces and the ichnofacies concept: implications for palaeoecology and palichnostratigraphy, p. 241–268. In Donovan, S. K. (ed.), The Palaeobiology of Trace Fossils. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., UK.Google Scholar
Lull, R. S. 1918. Fossil footprints from the Grand Canyon of the Colorado. American Journal of Science, 45:337–346.Google Scholar
McKeever, P. J. 1991. Trackway preservation in eolian sandstones from the Permian of Scotland. Geology, 19:726–729.Google Scholar
McKeever, P. J. 1992. Petrography and diagenesis of the Permo—Triassic of Scotland, p. 71–92. In Parnell, J. (ed.), Basins on the Atlantic seaboard: petroleum geology, sedimentology and basin evolution. Geological Society Special Publication No. 62.Google Scholar
McKeever, P. J. 1994. A new vertebrate trackway from the Permian of Dumfries and Galloway. Scottish Journal of Geology, 30:11–14.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1842. Report on British fossil reptiles: part 2. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (for 1841), 60–204.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. 1959. Die Cornberger fährten im rahmen der Vierfüßler-Entwicklung. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 28:1–137.Google Scholar
Spamer, E. E. 1984. Palaeontology in the Grand Canyon of Arizona: 125 years of lessons and enigmas from the late PreCambrian to the present. The Mosasaur, 2:45–128.Google Scholar