Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:16:25.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

External morphology and paleobiology of Heliophyllum halli (Zoantharia, Rugosa), from the Middle Devonian Hamilton Group of New York State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

James E. Sorauf
James E. Sorauf*
Affiliation:
Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, 13902–6000
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heliophyllum halli contains highly variable, mostly solitary rugose corals. Specimens reported here come from shaly beds of the Middle Devonian Hamilton Group in New York State. Early recognition of morphotype variation led James Hall to establish numerous species in the H. halli group that were later interpreted by John Wells in terms of varying life history. Life on unstable and/or soft substrates was facilitated for these corals by talons, root-like structures that allowed larval settling and post-larval development on hard particles such as echinoderm or shell debris. Variation in subsequent growth history is reflected in corallum shape and change in diameter. Straight growth axes reflect partial burial accompanied by vertical growth, while growth axis curvature resulted from unequal settling into substrate or alternatively, life at the surface of substrate, with sharp bends (geniculations) reflecting major changes in growth orientation. Decrease in diameter resulted from environmental stress, with greatest effects on the peripheral portion of the calice. Other major reactions to increased burial rate (through sinking or increased sedimentation) are epithecal secretion to form an outer wall for isolation of itself from surrounding sediment or decrease in polyp size as shown by terminal shrinking of the corallum diameter, at times nearly to zero. Yonge's (1940) summary of observations on living coral polyps suggests that the living H. halli was nonzooxanthellate, with an efficient system of feeding that utilized its multitude of tentacles without the help of cilia, which thus were able to generate currents to promote efficient sediment cleansing. Sediment shedding would also have been aided by polypal distension (swelling) above a reflexed calical margin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 24 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, G. C. 1979. Sedimentary relationships of Portland Point and associated Middle Devonian rocks in central and western New York. Bulletin of the New York State Museum, 43:1–24.Google Scholar
Baird, G. C., and Brett., C. E. 1983. Regional variation and paleontology of two coral beds in the Middle Devonian Hamilton Group of western New York. Journal of Paleontology, 57:417–446.Google Scholar
Chevalier, J.-P. 1987. Ordre des Scléractiniaires. Traité de Zoologie, Masson, Paris, 3:403–764.Google Scholar
Elias, R. J. 1984. Paleobiology of solitary rugose corals, Late Ordovician of North America, p. 533–537. In Oliver, W. A. Jr., Sando, W. J., Cairns, S. D., Coates, A. G., McIntyre, I. G., Bayer, F. M., and Sorauf, J. E. (eds.), Fourth International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria, Washington, D.C., August 1983. Palaeontographica Americana, 54.Google Scholar
Elias, R. J., and Buttler., C. J. 1986. Late Ordovician solitary rugose corals preserved in life position. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 23:739–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, R. J., Zeilstra, R. G., and Bayer., T. N. 1988. Paleoenvironmental reconstruction based on horn corals, with an example from the Late Ordovician of North America. Palaios, 3:22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorowski, J. 1997. Remarks on the paleobiology of Rugosa. Geologos, 2:5–58.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1876. Illustrations of Devonian Fossils: Corals of the Upper Helderberg and Hamilton Groups. Weed, Parsons and Co., Albany, 39 plates (no text).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, J. A. E. B. 1970. Sedimentological factors affecting the distribution and growth of Visean caninioid corals in north-west Ireland. Palaeontology, 13:191–209.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M., and Orr., A. P. 1931. Sedimentation on Low Isles Reef and its relation to coral growth: Great Barrier Reef Expedition, 1928–1929. Scientific Reports, British Museum (Natural History), 1:94–133.Google Scholar
Neuman, B. 1988. Some aspects of life strategies of Early Paleozoic rugose corals. Lethaia, 21:97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nudds, J., and Day., A. 1997. The effects of clastic sedimentation on a fasciculate rugose coral from the Lower Carboniferous of northern England. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural, Sección Geológica, 91:93–97.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1993. The Siphonophrentidae (rugose corals, Devonian) of eastern North America, p. B1–B32. In Shorter Contributions to Paleontology and Stratigraphy, 1992. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 2024.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1997. Origins and relationships of colonial Heliophyllum in the upper Middle Devonian (Givetian) of New York. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural, Sección Geológica, 91:53–60.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr., and Sorauf., J. E. 1994. Branching Heliophyllum (Devonian rugose corals) from New York and Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 68:1183–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1998. The Palaeozoic corals, II: structure, variation and palaeoecology. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 52:1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. W. 1937. Individual variation in the rugose coral species Heliophyllum halli E. & H. Palaeontographica Americana, 2:5–22.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1930. Studies on the physiology of corals, I. Feeding mechanisms and food. Great Barrier Reef Expedition, 1928–29, Scientific Reports. British Museum (Natural History), 1:2–57.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1940. The biology of reef-building corals. Great Barrier Reef Expedition, 1928–29, Scientific Reports. British Museum (Natural History), 1:354–391.Google Scholar