Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:35:11.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maastrichtiocaris rostratus new genus and species, the first Cretaceous cycloid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

René H. B. Fraaije ,
Frederick R. Schram  and
Ronald Vonk
René H. B. Fraaije
Affiliation:
Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, 5283 WB Boxtel, Netherlands,
Frederick R. Schram
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Mauritskade 57, 1092 AD Amsterdam, Netherlands, ,
Ronald Vonk
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Mauritskade 57, 1092 AD Amsterdam, Netherlands, ,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the description of the first cycloid from the Carboniferous of Yorkshire, England (Phillips, 1835) the Cycloidea have been placed in many different groups within the Arthropoda. These include agnostid trilobites (Phillips, 1835), xiphosure merostomes (Packard, 1872; Oosterink, 1978), limuloid-like crustaceans (Woodward, 1905), decapod brachyurans (Trauth, 1918), branchiurans (Hopwood, 1925), copepods (Clark, 1989), and maxillopodan crustaceans (Schram et al., 1997).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , March 2003 , pp. 386 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, N. D. L. 1989. A study of a Namurian crustacean-bearing shale from the western Midland Valley of Scotland. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, 341 p.Google Scholar
Dahl, E. 1956. Some crustacean relationships, p. 138–147. In Wingstrand, K. G. (ed.), Bertil Hangström, Zoological Papers in Honour of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Zoological Institute, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Fraaye, R. H. B. 1996a. A new Tethyan migrant: Cretachlorodius enciensis n. gen., n. sp. (Crustacea, Decapoda), from the Maastrichtian type area. Journal of Paleontology, 70:293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraaye, R. H. B. 1996b. Swimming crabs from the Maastrichtian type area: radiation, migration, competition and extinction. Acta Geologica Polonica, 47:46:269–278.Google Scholar
Fraaye, R. H. B. and Collins, J. S. H. 1987. A new crab, Prehepatus werneri from the type Maastrichtian of The Netherlands. Journal of Paleontology, 61:549–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1928. Zur Frage der ältesten fossilen Krabben. Centralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontlogie, Abteilung B, 6:388–398.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1969. Cycloidea, p. R567–570. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. R, Arthropoda 4, Volume 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Goldring, R. 1967. Cyclus martinensis sp. nov. (Crustacea) from the Upper Viséan of the Mendip Hills, England. Palaeontology, 10:317–321.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. T. 1925. On the Family Cyclidae Packard. The Geological Magazine, 62:289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebau, A. 1978. Paläobathymetrische und Paläoklimatologische Veränderungen im Mikrofaunenbild der Maastrichter Tuffkreide. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 157:233–237.Google Scholar
von Myer, H. 1847. Halicyne und Lithogaster, zwei Crustaceen-genera aus dem Muschelkalke Würtemberg's. Paläontographica, 1:216–279.Google Scholar
Oosterink, H. W. 1978. Arthropoda (Geleedpotigen) uit de Onder-Muschelkalk van Winterswijk. Grondboor en Hamer, 32:2–8.Google Scholar
Oosterink, H. W. 1986. Winterswijk, geologie deel II. De Trias-periode (geologie, mineralen en fossielen). Wetenschappelijke Mededeling van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging, 178:1–120.Google Scholar
Packard, A. S. 1872. The development of Limulus polyphemus . Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History, 1:155–202.Google Scholar
Packard, A. S. 1885. Types of Carboniferous Xiphosura new to North America. American Naturalist, 19:291–294.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1835. Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire, 2nd edition. John Murray, London, i–xii, 184 p., 23 plates, 1 map.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R., Vonk, R., and Hof, C. H. J. 1997. Mazon Creek Cycloidea. Journal of Paleontology, 71:261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trauth, F. 1918. Über einige Krustazeenreste aus der alpin-mediterranen Trias. Kaiserliches und Königliches Naturhistorisches Hofmuseum Wien, Annalen, 32:172–192.Google Scholar
Vannier, J., and Babin, C. 1995. Hanadirella El-Khayal, 1985, un arthropode (?) énigmatique de l'Ordovicien nord-gondwanien. Geobios, 28:473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, H. 1905. Further notes on Cyclus johnsoni, from the Coal Measures near Dudley. The Geological Magazine, series 5, 2:490–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar