Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:13:15.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematics and evolution of Paleozoic and Mesozoic damselfly-like Odonatoptera of the ‘protozygopteran’ grade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

André Nel
Affiliation:
CNRS UMR 7205, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CP 50, Entomologie, 45 rue Buffon, Paris F-75005, France,
Günter Bechly
Affiliation:
Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Abt. Paläontologie, Rosenstein 1, Stuttgart D-70191, Germany,
Jakub Prokop
Affiliation:
Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Praha 2, Czech Republic,
Olivier Béthoux
Affiliation:
40 rue d'Aveillans, La Motte d'Aveillans F-38770, France,
Gunther Fleck
Affiliation:

Abstract

The Paleozoic to Mesozoic grade ‘Protozygoptera’ is revised. It appears to be composed of two main lineages, namely the superfamily Permagrionoidea, and the Archizygoptera. The latter taxon forms a monophyletic group together with Panodonata (=crown-Odonata plus their closest stem-relatives). Therefore, the ‘Protozygoptera’ as previously understood is paraphyletic. Diagnostic characters of the ‘Protozygoptera’, Permagrionoidea, and Archizygoptera are re-evaluated. The Permolestidae is considered as a junior synonym of the Permagrionidae. The following new taxa are described: Permolestes sheimogorai new species, Permolestes soyanaiensis new species, Epilestes angustapterix new species, Solikamptilon pectinatus new species (all in Permagrionidae); Lodeviidae new family (for Lodevia); Luiseiidae new family (including Luiseia breviata new genus and species); Kennedya azari new species, Kennedya pritykinae new species, Kennedya ivensis new species, Progoneura grimaldii new species (all in Kennedyidae); Engellestes chekardensis new genus and species (in Bakteniidae); and Azaroneura permiana new genus and species (in Voltzialestidae). The Kaltanoneuridae and Oboraneuridae are revised. The evolution of protozygopteran Odonatoptera during the transition from the Permian to the Triassic is discussed. The larger taxa of the permagrionoid lineage apparently did not cross through the Permian–Triassic boundary, unlike the more gracile Archizygoptera. This last group shows a remarkable longevity from the late Carboniferous to the Early Cretaceous. It also presents a great taxonomic and morphological stability, with genera ranging from the Permian to the Triassic, and a wing venation pattern nearly unchanged from the late Carboniferous to the Late Triassic. The mass extinction at the end of the Permian period seemingly had a minor effect on these tiny and delicate insects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechly, G. 1996. Morphologische Untersuchungen am Flügelgeäder der rezenten Libellen und deren Stammgruppenvertreter (Insecta; Pterygota; Odonata), unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Phylogenetischen Systematik und des Grundplanes der Odonata. Petalura, Special Vol. 2, 402 p.Google Scholar
Bechly, G. 1997. New fossil odonates from the Upper Triassic of Italy, with a redescription of Italophlebia gervasuttii, and a reclassification of Triassic dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata). Rivista del Museo Civico di Scienze Naturali ‘Enrico Caffi’, 19:3170.Google Scholar
Bechly, G. 2009. Phylogenetic classification of fossil and extant odonates. Internet site:http://www.bernstein.naturkundemuseum-bw.de/odonata/system.htm.Google Scholar
Bechly, G., Brauckmann, C., Zessin, W., and Gröning, E. 2001. New results concerning the morphology of the most ancient dragonflies (Insecta: Odonatoptera) from the Namurian of Hagen-Vorhalle (Germany). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 39:209226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béthoux, O., Papier, F., and Nel, A. 2005. The Triassic radiation of the entomofauna. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 4:541553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagoderov, V. A., Grimaldi, D., and Fraser, N. C. 2007. How time flies for flies: diverse Diptera from the Triassic of Virginia and early radiation of the order. American Museum Novitates, 3572:139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauckmann, C. 2004. Arachniden und Insekten aus dem Namurium von Hagen-Vorhalle (Ober-Karbon; West-Deutschland). Veröffentlichungen aus dem Fuhlrott-Museum, Band 1, 275 p.Google Scholar
Bybee, S. M., Ogden, T. H., Branham, M. A., and Whiting, M. F. 2008. Molecules, morphology and fossils: a comprehensive approach to odonate phylogeny and the evolution of the odonate wing. Cladistics, 23:138.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1931. The lower Permian insects of Kansas. Pt. 2. The orders Palaeodictyoptera, Protodonata, and Odonata. American Journal of Science, (serie 5), 21:97139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1939. The lower Permian insects of Kansas. Pt. 8. Additional Megasecoptera, Protodonata, Odonata, Homoptera, Psocoptera, Plecoptera, and Protoperlaria. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 73(3):2970.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1947. Lower Permian insects from Oklahoma. Pt. 1. Introduction and the orders Megasecoptera, Protodonata, and Odonata. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, New York, 76:2554.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1992. Superclass Hexapoda. InMoore, R. C. and Kaesler, R. L.(eds.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Boulder, Colorado. (R), Arthropoda 4, 3/4, xxii + 655 p.Google Scholar
Dumont, H. J., Vierstraete, A., and Vanfleteren, J. R. 2010. A molecular phylogeny of the Odonata (Insecta). Systematic Entomology, 35:618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, G., Bechly, G., Martínez-Delclòs, X., Jarzembowski, E., and Nel, A. 2004. A revision of the Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous dragonfly family Tarsophlebiidae, with a discussion on the phylogenetic positions of the Tarsophlebiidae and Sieblosiidae (Insecta, Odonatoptera, Panodonata). Geodiversitas, 26:3360.Google Scholar
Fleck, G., Brenk, M., and Misof, B. 2008. Larval and molecular characters help to solve phylogenetic puzzles in the highly diverse dragonfly family Libellulidae (Insecta: Odonata: Anisoptera): The Tetrathemistinae are a polyphyletic group. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 8:116.Google Scholar
Fraser, F. C. 1957. A reclassification of the order Odonata, based on some new interpretations of the venation of the dragonfly wing. Handbook of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, 12:1133.Google Scholar
Hagen, H. A. 1862. Über die Neuropteren aus dem lithographischen Schiefer in Bayern. Palaeontographica, 10:96145.Google Scholar
Handlirsch, A. 1906. Die fossilen Insekten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen. Ein Handbuch für Paläontologen und Zoologen. Wilhelm Engelmann, Berlin. 1430 p.Google Scholar
Huang, D-Y. and Nel, A. 2009. The first Chinese Tarsophlebiidae from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation, with morphological and phylogenetic implications (Odonatoptera: Panodonata). Cretaceous Research, 30:429433.Google Scholar
Huang, D-Y., Petrulevičius, J. F., and Nel, A. 2010. New morphological data from the Jurassic of Inner Mongolia confirms the damsel-fly aspect of Protomyrmeleontidae (Insecta: Odonatoptera). European Journal of Entomology, 107:615620.Google Scholar
Huguet, A., Nel, A., Martínez-Delclòs, X., Bechly, G., and Martins-Neto, R. 2002. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the Protanisoptera (Insecta: Odonatoptera). Geobios, 35:537560.Google Scholar
Jarzembowski, E. A. and Nel, A. 2002. The earliest damselfly-like insect and the origin of modern dragonflies (Insecta: Odonatoptera: Protozygoptera). Proceedings of the Geologist's Association, 113:165169.Google Scholar
Lukashevich, E. D., Przhiboro, A. A., Marchal-Papier, F., and Grauvogel-Stamm, L. 2010. The oldest occurrence of immature Diptera (Insecta), Middle Triassic, France. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (N.S.), 46:422.Google Scholar
Martynov, A. 1930. New Permian insects from Tikhie Gory, Kazan province. 1. Palaeoptera. Trudy Geologicheskovo Muzeya, Akademii nauk SSSR, 6:6986.Google Scholar
Martynov, A. 1932. New Permian Paleoptera with the discussion of some problems of their evolution. Trudy Paleozoologicheskovo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva, 1:144.Google Scholar
Martynov, A. 1937. Permian fossil insects from Kargala and their relationships. Trudy Paleontologicheskovo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva, 7:892. (in Russian)Google Scholar
Martynov, A. 1938. Ocherki geologicheskoj istorii i filogenii otryadov nasekomykh (Pterygota). 1. Palaeoptera i Neoptera–Polyneoptera [Essays on the geologic history and phylogeny of insect orders (Pterygota)]. Trudy Paleontologicheskovo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva, 7:1149. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Nel, A., Béthoux, O., Bechly, G., Martínez-Delclòs, X., and Papier, F. 2001. The Permo–Triassic Odonatoptera of the ‘protodonate’ grade (Insecta: Odonatoptera). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (N.S.), 37:501525.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Gand, G., Fleck, G., Béthoux, O., and Lapeyrie, J. 1999a. Saxonagrion minutus nov. gen. et sp., the oldest damselfly from the upper Permian of France (Odonatoptera, Panodonata, Saxonagrionidae nov. fam.). Geobios, 32:883888.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Gand, G., Garric, J., Jarzembowski, A. E., and Lapeyrie, J. 1999b. The first recorded protozygopteran insects from the upper Permian of France. Palaeontology, 42:8397.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Nel, P., Petrulevičius, J. F., Perrichot, V., Prokop, J., and Azar, D. 2010. The Wagner Parsimony using Morphological Characters: A new method for palaeosynecological studies. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, (N.S.), 46:276292.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Martinez-Delclos, X., Paicheler, J-C., and Henrotay, M. 1993. Les ‘Anisozygoptera’ fossiles. Phylogénie et classification (Odonata). Martinia, Special Issue, 3:1311.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Papier, F., Stamm-Grauvogel, L., and Gall, J-C. 1996. Voltzialestes triasicus, n. gen., n. sp., le premier Odonata fossile du Trias des Vosges (France). Morphologie, affinités et phylogénie. (Odonatoptera, Odonata, Protozygoptera). Paleontologia Lombarda, (N.S.), 5:2536.Google Scholar
Nel, A., Petrulevicius, J. F., and Martinez-Delclos, X. 2005. New Mesozoic Protomyrmeleontidae (Insecta: Odonatoptera: Archizygoptera) from Asia with a new phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 3:187201.Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 2002a. Superorder Scarabaeida Laicharting, 1781. Order Coleoptera Linné, 1758. The beetles,. p. 164176. InRasnitsyn, A. P. and Quicke, D. L. J.(eds.). History of Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Ponomarenko, A. G. 2002b. Superorder Myrmeleontidea Latreille, 1802 (=Neuropteroidea Handlirsch, 1903),. p. 176189. InRasnitsyn, A. P. and Quicke, D. L. J.(eds.). History of Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Pritykina, L. N. 1981. Novye triasovye strekozy srednej Azii,. p. 542. InVishniakova, V. N., Dlussky, G. M., and Pritykina, L. N., (eds.). Novye iskopaemye nasekomye s territorii SSSR. Trudy Paleontologicheskovo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR., 183:542. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Rasnitsyn, A. P. and Zherikhin, V. V. 2002. Impression fossils,. p. 437444. InRasnitsyn, A. P. and Quicke, D. L. J.(eds.). History of Insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, E. F. and Kukalová-Peck, J. 1984. A new interpretation of dragonfly wing venation based upon early Carboniferous fossils from Argentina (Insecta: Odonatoidea) and basic characters states in pterygote wings. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62:11501166.Google Scholar
Rohdendorf, B. B. 1961. Podklass Pterygota,. p. 6988. InRohdendorf, B. B., Becker-Migdisova, E. E., Martynova, O. M., and Sharov, A.(eds.). Paleozojskie nasekomye kuznetskogo bassejna. Trudy Paleontologicheskovo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 85:1705.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. W., Lucas, S. G., and Rowland, J. M. 2004. The blattida (insecta) fauna of Carrizo Arroyo, New Mexico—Biostratigraphic link between marine and non-marine Pennsylvanian/Permian boundary profiles. InLucas, S. G. and Zeigler, K. E.(eds.). Carboniferous–Permian transition at Carrizo Arroyo, Central New Mexico, Bulletin of the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 25:247261.Google Scholar
Sellards, E. H. 1909. Types of Permian insects. Pt. 3: Megasecoptera, Oryctoblattinidae, Protorthoptera. American Journal of Sciences, 4, 27:151173.Google Scholar
Shcherbakov, D. E., Lukashevich, E. D., and Blagoderov, V. A. 1995. Triassic Diptera and initial radiation of the order. International Journal of Dipterological Research, 6:75115.Google Scholar
Tasch, P. and Zimmerman, J. R. 1959. New Permian insects discovered in Kansas and Oklahoma. Science, 130:1656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tasch, P. and Zimmerman, J. R. 1962. The Asthenohymen-Delopterum bed—A new Leonardian insect horizon in the Wellington of Kansas and Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 36:13191333.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1925. Kansas Permian insects. 5. The orders Protodonata and Odonata. American Journal of Science, (5), 9:4073.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1928. A Permian fossil damselfly wing from the Falkland Island. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 76:5563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegmann, B. M., Trautwein, M. D., Kim, J-W., Cassel, B. K., Bertone, M. A., Winterton, S. L., and Yeates, D. K. 2009. Single–copy nuclear genes resolve the phylogeny of the holometabolous insects. BMC Biology, 7:116.Google Scholar
Zalessky, G. 1948. Nasekomye iz Permskikh otlozhenij Solikamskovo i Cherdynoskovo rajonov. Voprosy Teoreticheskoj i Prikladnoj Geologii, 5:4452. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Zessin, W. 2008. Überlick über die paläozoischen Libellen (Insecta, Odonatoptera). Virgo, Mitteilungsblatt des Entomologischen Vereins Mecklenburg, 11:532.Google Scholar