Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:45:38.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomy and trunk-ring architecture of pleurojulid millipedes (Diplopoda: Chilognatha: Pleurojulida) from the Pennsylvanian of Europe and North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Heather M. Wilson  and
Joseph T. Hannibal
Heather M. Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, 4112 Plant Sciences Building, University of Maryland, College Park 20742
Joseph T. Hannibal
Affiliation:
The Cleveland Museum of Natural History, 1 Wade Oval Drive, Ohio 44106-1767,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pleurojulid millipedes, known since the turn of the last century to be relatively abundant in the Westphalian D (Carboniferous: Pennsylvanian) Gaskohl of Nýřany, Czech Republic, are here also identified as an important component of the Pennsylvanian (Westphalian D) Mazon Creek millipede fauna preserved in ironstone nodules. Pleurojulids reach lengths approaching 10 cm, have as many as 69 body segments, medium-sized heads, and large ocellaria with upwards of 40 ocelli. Pleurojulids have previously been interpreted as having either a juliform-like or a colobognathan-like trunk-ring architecture. In order to distinguish between these two hypotheses, almost all pleurojulid specimens in museum collections were surveyed to document the deformation pattern of exoskeletal elements to aid in reconstruction of the trunk-ring architecture. The Nýřany specimens are completely flattened while the Mazon Creek specimens retain a degree of three-dimensionality. In order to assess how trunk-ring architecture controls patterns of deformation, a variety of extant millipedes were experimentally compressed. The distribution of exoskeletal elements in pleurojulid fossils was most similar to that seen in compressed extant polyzoniid millipedes. Based on the available evidence, pleurojulid trunk-ring architecture is reconstructed as semicircular in cross section, consisting of arched diplotergites, free pleurites firmly articulated to the lateral margins of the tergites and held in a near horizontal position, and free sternites. Pleurojulida are hypothesized to be basal helminthomorph, the sister group to Colobognatha, though inclusion in Helminthomorpha is equivocal. The taxonomy of previously described pleurojulid millipedes from Nýřany is revised and newly recognized specimens from Mazon Creek specimens are described. Two genera are recognized within the new order Pleurojulida: Pleurojulus and Isojulus. Two species of Pleurojulus are recognized: P. biornatus and P. levis. Pleurojulus aculeatus and P. pinguis are synonymized with P. levis. Only one species of Isojulus, I. constans, is recognized with I. setipes, I. marginatus synonymized with it along with Pleurojulus longipes and P. falcifer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 6 , November 2005 , pp. 1105 - 1119
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, G. C. 1997a. Geologic setting of the Mazon Creek area fossil deposit, p. 16–20. In Shabica, C. W. and Hay, A. A. (eds.), Richardson's Guide to the Fossil Fauna of Mazon Creek. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago.Google Scholar
Baird, G. C. 1997b. Paleoenvironmental setting of the Mazon Creek biota, p. 35–51. In Shabica, C. W. and Hay, A. A. (eds.), Richardson's Guide to the Fossil Fauna of Mazon Creek. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago.Google Scholar
Baird, G. C., and Anderson, J. L. 1997. Relative abundance of different Mazon Creek organisms, p. 27–29. In Shabica, C. W. and Hay, A. A. (eds.), Richardson's Guide to the Fossil Fauna of Mazon Creek. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago.Google Scholar
Baird, G. C., Shabica, C. W., Anderson, J. L., and Richardson, E. S. Jr. 1985. Biota of a Pennsylvanian muddy coast: Habitats within the Mazonian Delta complex, northeast Illinois. Journal of Paleontology, 59:253–281.Google Scholar
Brandt, J. F. 1837. Note sur un ordre nouveau de la classe des Myriapodes et sur 1° tablissement des sections de cette classe d'animaux en general. Bulletin scientifique de l'Académie impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg, 5:307–315.Google Scholar
Burke, J. J. 1979. A new millipede genus, Myriacantherpestes (Diplopoda, Archipolypoda) and a new species, Myriacantherpestes bradebirksi, from the English Coal Measures. Kirtlandia, 30:1–24.Google Scholar
Cook, O. F. 1895. Introductory notes on the families of Diplopoda, p. 1–7. In Cook, O. F. and Collins, G. N. (eds.), The Craspedosomatidae of North America. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 9:1–100.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1981. An early Triassic millipede from Siberia and its evolutionary significance. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, 7:395–404.Google Scholar
Enghoff, H. 1978. Parthenogenesis and spanandry in millipedes. Abhandlungen und Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 21/22:73–85.Google Scholar
Enghoff, H. 1984. Phylogeny of millipedes—a cladistic analysis. Zeitschrift für zoologische systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 22:8–26.Google Scholar
Enghoff, H. 1990. The ground-plan of chilognathan millipedes (external morphology), p. 1–21. In Minelli, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Myriapodology. E. J. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1879. Neue Übersicht in der Gaskohle und den Kalksteinen der Performation in Böhmen vorge funde den Tierreste. Sitzungsberichte der Königlichen böhmischen Gesselschaft der Wissenschaften, Prague, 1879:184–195.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1895. Vorläufiger Bericht über die Arthropoden und Mollusken der böhmischen Permformation. Sitzungsberichte Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften (Jahrgang), 1894:1–4.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1899. Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteine der Permformation Böhmens, Volume 4, Pt. 1. F. Rivnác, Prague, 152 p.Google Scholar
Gervais, P. 1844. Études sur les Myriapodes. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, series 3, 2:51–80.Google Scholar
Haacker, U. 1969. Spermaübertragung von Glomeris (Diplopoda). Naturwissenschaften, 56:467.Google Scholar
Haacker, U. 1970. Der Stridulationsapparat von Loboglomeris und seine Funktion im Sexualverhalten. Vie Milieu, 20:57–64.Google Scholar
Haacker, U. 1974. Patterns of communication in courtship and mating behaviour of millipedes (Diplopoda). Zoological Society of London Symposia, 32:317–328.Google Scholar
Hannibal, J. T. 1995. Modified legs (clasping appendages?) of Carboniferous euphoberiid millipeds (Diplopoda: Euphoberiida). Journal of Paleontology, 69:932–938.Google Scholar
Hannibal, J. T. 1997. Myriapods and arthropleurids, p. 172–183. In Shabica, C. W. and Hay, A. A. (eds.), Richardson's Guide to the Fossil Fauna of Mazon Creek. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hannibal, J. T. 2001. Hexecontasoma, a new helminthomorph millipede (Hexecontasomatidae, n. fam.) from the Mazon Creek, Illinois, fauna (Carboniferous, North America), p. 19–35. In Wytwer, J. and Golovatch, S. I. (eds.), Progress in Studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Myriapodology. Fragmenta Faunistica, 43 (Supplement 2000).Google Scholar
Hannibal, J. T., and Feldmann, R. M. 1981. Systematics and functional morphology of oniscomorph millipedes (Arthropoda: Diplopoda) from the Carboniferous of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 55:730–746.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. L. 1969. Myriapoda, exclusive of Insecta, p. R572–R606. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. R. Arthropoda 4. Vol. 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. L. 1979. Classification of the Diplopoda. Museum D'Histoire Naturelle, Geneve, 237 p.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. L. 1982. Diplopoda, p. 689–724. In Parker, S. P. (ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. L. 1990. Diplopoda, p. 835–860. In Dindel, D. L. (ed.), Soil Biology Guide. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Holub, V. 1988. Geology and stratigraphy of Permo–Carboniferous continental basins of the Bohemian Massif in view of the latest research and analysis of stratigraphical methods used, p. 37–43. In Pešek, J. and Vozár, J. (eds.), Coal-Bearing Formations of Czechoslovakia. Dionýz Śtúr Institute of Geology, Bratislava.Google Scholar
Janssen, R., Prpic, N.-M., and Damen, W. G. M. 2004. Gene expression suggests decoupled dorsal and ventral segmentation in the millipede Glomeris marginata (Myriapoda: Diplopoda). Developmental Biology, 268:89–104.Google Scholar
Kraus, O. 1974. On the morphology of Palaeozoic diplopods, p. 13–22. In Blower, J. G. (ed.), Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 32.Google Scholar
Kuhn, O. 1949. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, 326 p.Google Scholar
Langford, G. 1963. The Wilmington Coal Fauna and Additions to the Wilmington Coal Flora from a Pennsylvanian Deposit in Will County, Illinois. Esconi Associates, Downers Gove, Illinois, 280 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802–1803. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des Crustacés et des Insectes; ouvrage faisant suite aux oeuvres de Leclerc de Buffon, et partie du cours complet d'histoire naturelle rédigé par C. S. Sonnini. Volume 2. F. Dufart, Paris, 467 p.Google Scholar
Latzel, R. 1886. Les Myriapodes des la Normanider (2e liste) suivie de diagnoses d'especes et de variétés nouvelles (de France, Algérie et Tunisie). Bulletin de la Société des Amis des Sciences naturelles, Rouen, 71:165–177.Google Scholar
Laurentiaux, D. 1953. Classe des Myriapodes (Myriapoda Leach, 1814), p. 385–395. In Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie. Volume 3. Masson et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1815. A tabular view of the external characters of four classes of animals which Linné arranged under Insecta. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 11:306–400.Google Scholar
Loomis, H. F. 1943. New cave and epigean millipeds of the United States, with notes on some established species. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 92:371–410.Google Scholar
Loomis, H. F., and Hoffman, R. L. 1962. A remarkable new family of spined polydesmoid Diplopoda, including a species lacking gonopods in the male sex. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 75:145–158.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M. 1961. The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms. Pt. 7. Functional requirements and body design in Colobognatha (Diplopoda), together with a comparative account of diplopod burrowing techniques, trunk musculature and segmentation. Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), 44:383–461.Google Scholar
Martynov, A. V. 1936. O Nekotorykh novykh materialakh chelenistonogikh zhivotnykh iz kuznetskogo basseina. Izvestiia Akademii nauk SSSR, Seriia Biologicheskaia, 6:1258–1260. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Müller, A. H. 1963. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologoie, Volume 2, Pt. 3. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 698 p.Google Scholar
Müller, A. H. 1992. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie. Baud 1. Allgemeine Grundlagen. 5. Auflage. G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 496 p.Google Scholar
Müller, A. H., and Zimmermann, H. 1962. Aus Jahrmillionen Tiere der Vorzeit. Veb Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 409 p.Google Scholar
Newport, G. 1844. A list of the species of Myriapoda, order Chilognatha, contained in the cabinets of the British Museum, with descriptions of a new genus and thirty-two new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 13:263–269.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N. 1882. On some fossil myriapods from the Lower Old Red Sandstone of Forfarshire. Proceedings of the Royal Physical Society, 77:177–188.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. 1887. On the classification of the Diplopoda. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 5, 20(35):283–295.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. 1894. Contributions to our knowledge of the arthropod fauna of the West Indies, Pt. III, Diplopoda and Malacopoda, with a supplement on the Arachnida of the class Pedipalpi. Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), 24:473–544, pls. 37–40.Google Scholar
Regier, J. C., Wilson, H. M., and Shultz, J. W. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of Myriapoda using three nuclear protein-coding genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 34:147–158.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. W., and Werneburg, R. 1998. Arthropleura und Diplopoda (Arthropoda) aus dem Unter-Rotliegend (Unter-Perm, Assel) des Thüringer Waldes (Südwest-Saale-Senke). Veröffentlichungen Natur-historisches Museum Schleusingen, 13:19–36.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R., and McKerrow, W. S. 1990. Revised world maps and introduction, p. 1–21. In McKerrow, W. S. and Scotese, C. R. (eds.), Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. Geological Society Memoir, No. 12.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1873. On the Carboniferous myriapods preserved in the sigillarian stumps of Nova Scotia. Boston Society of Natural History Memoir, 2:231–239.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1889. Archipolypoda, a subordinal type of spined myriapods from the Carboniferous formation. Boston Society of Natural History Memoir, 3:143–182.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1890. New Carboniferous Myriapoda from Illinois. Boston Society of Natural History Memoir, 4:417–442, pls. 33–38.Google Scholar
Shabica, C. W., and Hay, A. A. (eds.). 1997. Richardson's Guide to the Fossil Fauna of Mazon Creek. Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, 308 p.Google Scholar
Sharov, A. G. 1962. Class Diplopoda, p. 22–24. In Orlov, Yu. A. (ed.), Osnovy Paleontologii. Tom 9: Chlenistonogie, Trakheinye, i Khelitserovye. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Moscow.Google Scholar
Sharov, A. G. 1966. Basic Arthropodan Stock with Special Reference to Insects. Permagon Press, Oxford, 271 p.Google Scholar
Sharov, A. G. 1991. Class Diplopoda, p. 6–10. In Rohdendorf, B.B. (ed.), Fundamentals of Paleontology. Volume 9. Smithsonian Institution Libraries and the National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sierwald, P., Shear, W. A., Shelley, R. M., and Bond, J. E. 2003. Millipede phylogeny revisited in light of the enigmatic order Siphoniulida. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 41:87–99.Google Scholar
Silvestri, P. 1903. Classis Diplopoda. Volume 1. Anatome. Vesuviano, Portici, 272 p.Google Scholar
Verhoeff, K. W. 1910–1914. Die Diplopoden Deutschlands. C. F. Winter, Leipzig, 640 p.Google Scholar
Verhoeff, K. W. 1926–1932. Diplopoda, p. 1–2084. In Bronn, H. G. (ed.), Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs. Akademische Verlag, Leipzig, 5 (2).Google Scholar
Wilson, H. M. In press. Zosterogrammida, a new order of millipedes from the Middle Silurian of Scotland the Upper Carboniferous of Euramerica. Palaeontology.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. M., and Anderson, L. I. 2004. Morphology and taxonomy of Paleozoic millipedes (Diplopoda: Chilognatha: Archipolypoda) from Scotland. Journal of Paleontology, 78:169–184.Google Scholar