Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:39:49.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The minimum pension as an instrument of poverty protection in the defined contribution pension system – an example of Poland*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2013

AGNIESZKA CHŁOŃ-DOMIŃCZAK  and
PAWEŁ STRZELECKI
AGNIESZKA CHŁOŃ-DOMIŃCZAK
Affiliation:
Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of Statistics and Demography (e-mail: Agnieszka.Chlon@gmail.com, strzeleckip@gmail.com)
PAWEŁ STRZELECKI
Affiliation:
Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of Statistics and Demography (e-mail: Agnieszka.Chlon@gmail.com, strzeleckip@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pension systems' reforms are often related to a shift towards (fully or partially) defined contribution (DC) systems, in which the pension distribution reflects to a larger extent the wage distribution. In addition, relatively shorter working lives of those who have lower earnings increase the risk of receiving lower benefits. The aim of the paper is to present the changing role of a minimum pension as a tool of redistribution in the country that replaced a defined benefit (DB) pension system with a DC pension system. The old system in Poland had a significant income redistribution in the pension formula and the minimum pension was only a tool supporting this redistribution. After the introduction of the new mandatory pension system the main mechanism of redistribution (and a tool of social policy preventing poverty) is the minimum pension, financed from general taxes. According to the current rule of indexation, the minimum pension is expected to fall relative to the average wage in the economy. According to our simulations, the lack of changes of the current indexation method means that the minimum pension will fall below the International Labour Organisation (ILO) standard of the poverty protection of elderly by mid 2020s and in practice the last instrument of the poverty protection of elderly is going to disappear. However, the sole decision to change the indexation mechanism to the one based on full wage can create a significant pressure on public finance and distort incentives for prolonging work as 45% of women would be probably covered by the minimum pension guarantee (MPG). Results of simulations show that a raise and equalization of the retirement age for men and women combined with keeping a constant ratio of the minimum pension to the average (and also minimum) wage in the economy can be considered as a balanced solution that assures no further reduction of poverty protection and effective maintaining of this redistribution instrument.

Keywords

minimum pensionold-age povertydefined contributionindexationpension system
Type
Issues & Policy
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 326 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, D. (2009) NDC v FDC: Pros, cons and replication. MPRA Working Paper No. 33752, Available online at: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:33752Google Scholar
Chłoń, A., Góra, M., and Rutkowski, M. (1999) Shaping pension reform in Poland: security through diversity. The World Bank Social Protection Discussion Papers No. 9923. Available online at: http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:hdnspu:20852.Google Scholar
Chłoń, A., Góra, M., Lubyova, M., and Thomson, L.H. (2001) Pension reform in Slovakia – background and options: Can lessons be drawn from other transition countries? OECD Occasional Paper No. 53.Google Scholar
Chłoń-Domińczak, A. (2002) The Polish Pension Reform of 1999. In Fultz, E. (eds), Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe – Volume 2. Restructuring with Privatization: Case Studies of Hungary and Poland. Budapest: ILO, pp. 95–198.Google Scholar
Chłoń-Domińczak, A., Franco, D., and Palmer, E. (2012) The first wave of NDC reforms: the experiences of Italy, Poland, Latvia and Sweden. In Holzmann, R., Palmer, E., and Robalino, D. (eds), Nonfinancial Defined Contribution Pension Schemes in a Changing Pension World. Washington: World Bank, pp. 31–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deniszczuk, L. and Sajkiewicz, B. (1997) Kategoria minimum egzystencji. In Golinowska, S. (eds), Polska bieda II. Kryteria-Ocena-Przeciwdzialanie. Warsaw: Institute of Labour and Social Studies.Google Scholar
DG Employment and Social Protection Committee (2012) Pension Adequacy in the European Union 2010–2050. Brussels: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission and the Social Protection Committee.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009). The 2009 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008–2060). European Economy, 2/2009. Available online at: http://europa.eu/epc/publications/index_enGoogle Scholar
EUROSTAT (2008). New European population projection 2008–2060. Available online at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_SDDS/en/proj_r08c_esms.htm, http://www.aaliance.eu/public/news/eurostat-new-european-population-projections-2008-2060Google Scholar
Góra, M., Palmer, E. (2004) Shifting perspectives in pensions. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Working Paper No. 1369. Available online at: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Góra, M., Rutkowski, M. (2000). The quest for pension reform: Poland's security though diversity. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 286, University of Michigan. Available online at: http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:wdi:papers:2000-286Google Scholar
Hagemejer, K. (2009) The Right to Social Security: the ILO View, In Closing the Coverage Gap: Role of Social Pensions and other Retirement Income Transfers. In Holzmann, R.Robalino, D. A. and Takayama, N. (eds), Washington: World Bank, pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
Holzman, D., Palmer, E. (2009) The status of NDC discussion: introduction and overview. In Holzman, D. and Palmer, E. (eds), Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Kotowska, I.E., Stachura, J., and Strzelecki, P. (2008) Equality of retirement benefits received by men and women in selected European countries. Childbearing and future benefits. Social welfare policies, ENEPRI Research Reports, Available online at: http://www.ceps.eu/book/equality-retirement-benefits-received-men-and-women-selected-european-countries-childbearing-anGoogle Scholar
Kurowski, P. (2002) Koszyki minimum socjalnego i minimum egzystencji – dotychczasowe podejście. Available online at: www.ipiss.com.pl/teksty/kurowski.pdfGoogle Scholar
Liwiński, J., Giza-Poleszczuk, A., Góra, M., Sztanderska, U. (2008) Dezaktywizacja osób w wieku okołoemerytalnym. Raport z badań. Polish Ministry of Labour and Social Policy, Warsaw, Available online at: http://www.mpips.gov.pl/userfiles/File/Raporty/Dezaktywizacja.pdf [accessed 2 February 2012]Google Scholar
OECD (2009) Pensions at a Glance 2009: Retirement-income Systems in OECD Countries. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Queisser, M., Whitehouse, E. (2005) Pensions at a glance: public policies across OECD countries. MPRA Working Paper No. 10907. Available online at: http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:10907Google Scholar
Whitehouse, E. (2009) Pensions, Purchasing-Power Risk, Inflation and Indexation. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 77. Available online at: http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:elsaab:77-enGoogle Scholar
Zaidi, A. (2010) Poverty Risks for Older People in EU Countries – An Update, Vienna: European Centre. Available online at: http://www.euro.centre.org/data/1264603415_56681.pdfGoogle Scholar