Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:16:38.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic allocation decisions in the presence of funding ratio constraints*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2012

LIONEL MARTELLINI  and
VINCENT MILHAU
LIONEL MARTELLINI*
Affiliation:
EDHEC Business School and EDHEC-Risk Institute (e-mail: lionel.martellini@edhec.edu)
VINCENT MILHAU
Affiliation:
EDHEC-Risk Institute (e-mail: vincent.milhau@edhec.edu)
*
1Author for correspondence. Contact: EDHEC-Risk Institute, 400 Promenade des Anglais, BP 3116, 06202 Nice Cedex 3 France. Phone: +33 (0)4 93 18 34 94. Fax: +33 (0)4 93 18 78 44.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper introduces a continuous-time allocation model for an investor facing stochastic liability commitments indexed with respect to inflation. In the presence of funding ratio constraints, the optimal policy is shown to involve dynamic allocation strategies that are reminiscent of portfolio insurance strategies, extended to an asset–liability management (ALM) context. Empirical tests suggest that their benefits are relatively robust with respect to changes in the objective function and the introduction of various forms of market incompleteness. We also show that the introduction of maximum funding ratio targets would allow pension funds to decrease the cost of downside liability risk protection.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 549 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A previous version of this paper was circulated under the title ‘How costly is regulatory shorttermism for defined-benefit pension funds?’. We acknowledge financial support from the ‘Asset-Liability Management and Institutional Investment Management Chair’, BNP Paribas Investment Partners and the ‘Chaire Produits structurés et Produits dérivés’, Fédération Bancaire Française. We express our gratitude to the editor, Joshua Rauh, and two anonymous referees for extremely useful comments. We thank Noël Amenc, Peter Carr, Nicole El Karoui, Thomas Heckel, Pierre Moulin, Samuel Sender, Frédéric Surry, Volker Ziemann and participants at the Bachelier mathematical finance seminar, the Bloomberg finance seminar, the EDHEC-Risk finance seminar, the University Paris-Dauphine finance seminar, the 6th Madrid finance workshop and the Inquire Europe 2009 seminar for very useful comments. This work has also benefited from fruitful exchanges with the financial engineering team at BNP Paribas Investment Partners. Any remaining error is ours.

References

Amenc, N., Martellini, L., Milhau, V. and Ziemann, V. (2009) Asset–liability management in private wealth management. Journal of Portfolio Management, 36(1): 100–120.Google Scholar
Basak, S. (1995) A general equilibrium model of portfolio insurance. Review of Financial Studies, 8(4): 1059–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basak, S. (2002) A comparative study of portfolio insurance. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26(7–8): 1217–1241.Google Scholar
Basak, S., Shapiro, A. and Tepla, L. (2006) Risk management with benchmarking. Man-agement Science, 52(4): 542–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benninga, S. and Blume, M. (1985) On the optimality of portfolio insurance. Journal of Finance, 40(5): 1341–1352.Google Scholar
Black, F. and Jones, R. (1987) Simplifying portfolio insurance. Journal of Portfolio Man-agement, 14(4): 33–37.Google Scholar
Black, F. and Perold, A. (1992) Theory of constant proportion portfolio insurance. Journal of Portfolio Management, 16(3): 403–426.Google Scholar
Bodie, Z. (1996) What the pension benefit guaranty corporation can learn from the federal savings and loan insurance corporation. Journal of Financial Services Research, 10(1): 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodie, Z., Light, J.O., Mørck, R. and Taggart, R.A. (1985) Corporate pension policy: an empirical investigation. Financial Analysts Journal, 41(5): 10–16.Google Scholar
Bouchard, B., Touzi, N. and Zeghal, A. (2004) Dual formulation of the utility maximization problem: the case of nonsmooth utility. Annals of Applied Probability, 14(2): 678–717.Google Scholar
Brennan, M.J. and Solanki, R. (1981) Optimal portfolio insurance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 16(3): 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.J. and Xia, Y. (2002) Dynamic asset allocation under inflation. Journal of Finance, 57(3): 1201–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, S. (2000) Risk-constrained dynamic active portfolio management. Management Science, 46(9): 1188–1199.Google Scholar
Cox, J.C. and Huang, C. (1991) A variational problem arising in financial economics. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 20(5): 465–487.Google Scholar
Cox, J.C. and Huang, C.F. (1989) Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process. Journal of Economic Theory, 49(1): 33–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuoco, D. and Kaniel, R. (2001) Equilibrium prices in the presence of delegated portfolio management. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania and Duke University.Google Scholar
Detemple, J. and Rindisbacher, M. (2008) Dynamic asset liability management with tolerance for limited shortfalls. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43(3): 281–294.Google Scholar
Driessen, J. and Maenhout, P. (2007) An empirical portfolio perspective on option pricing anomalies. Review of Finance, 11(4): 561–603.Google Scholar
Föllmer, H. and Schweizer, M. (1990) Hedging of contingent claims under incomplete information. Applied Stochastic Analysis, 5: 389–414.Google Scholar
Franke, G., Stapleton, R.C. and Subrahmanyam, M.G. (1998) Who buys and who sells options: The role of options in an economy with background risk. Journal of Economic Theory, 82(1): 89–109.Google Scholar
Gómez, J.P. and Zapatero, F. (2003) Asset pricing implications of benchmarking: a two factor CAPM. European Journal of Finance, 9(4): 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, D.F., Merton, R.C. and Bodie, Z. (2007) Contingent claims approach to measuring and managing sovereign credit risk. Journal of Investment Management, 5(4): 5–28.Google Scholar
Grossman, S.J. and Vila, J.L. (1989) Portfolio insurance in complete markets: a note. Journal of Business, 62(4): 473–476.Google Scholar
Grossman, S.J. and Zhou, Z. (1996) Equilibrium analysis of portfolio insurance. Journal of Finance, 51(4): 1379–1403.Google Scholar
Harrison, J.M. and Kreps, D.M. (1979) Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. Journal of Economic Theory, 20(3): 381–408.Google Scholar
He, H. and Pearson, N.D. (1991) Consumption and portfolio policies with incomplete markets and short-sale constraints: the infinite dimensional case. Journal of Economic Theory, 54(2): 259–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoevenaars, R.P.M.M., Molenaar, R.D.J., Schotman, P.C. and Steenkamp, T.B.M. (2008) Strategic asset allocation with liabilities: beyond stocks and bonds. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32(9): 2939–2970.Google Scholar
Leland, H.E. (1980) Who should buy portfolio insurance. Journal of Finance, 35(2): 581–594.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Longstaff, F.A. and Pan, J. (2003) Dynamic asset allocation with event risk. Journal of Finance, 58(1): 231–259.Google Scholar
Merton, R.C. (1973) An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica, 41(5): 867–887.Google Scholar
Merton, R.C. (1976) Option pricing when underlying asset returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. (1993) Continuous-time Finance. Blackwell Publishers, reprinted 1998. Chapter 21, p. 649–675.Google Scholar
Munk, C., Sørensen, C. and Vinther, T.N. (2004) Dynamic asset allocation under meanreverting returns, stochastic interest rates and inflation uncertainty: are popular recommendations consistent with rational behavior? International Review of Economics and Finance, 13: 141–166.Google Scholar
Pugh, C. (2006) Funding rules and actuarial methods. OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 1. available at www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
Rudolf, M. and Ziemba, W.T. (2004) Intertemporal surplus management. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(5): 975–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, W.F. and Tint, L.G. (1990) Liabilities – A new approach. Journal of Portfolio Management, 16(2): 5–10.Google Scholar
Sundaresan, S. and Zapatero, F. (1997) Valuation, optimal asset allocation and retirement incentives of pension plans. Review of Financial Studies, 10(3): 631–660.Google Scholar
Tepla, L. (2001) Optimal investment with minimum performance constraints. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(10): 1629–1645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Binsbergen, J.H. and Brandt, M.W. (2009) Optimal asset allocation in asset liability management. Working paper.Google Scholar
Vasicek, O. (1977) An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2): 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar