Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:04:48.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The plasma wake of mesosonic conducting bodies. Part 2. An experimental parametric study of the mid-wake ion density peak

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Nobie H. Stone
Nobie H. Stone
Affiliation:
Space Sciences Laboratory, NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama 35812
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experimental investigation of the disturbed flow field created by conducting bodies in a mesosonic, collisionless plasma stream is reported. Part 1 dealt with ion focusing by the body's plasma sheath and the subsequent filling of the near-wake void region. In part 2, the mid-wake region is investigated, where, for bodies of the order of a Debye length in size, the focused ion streams converge to form a significant current density peak on the wake axis. A parametric description is obtained of the behaviour of the amplitude, width, and position of this peak. The results also indicate that portions of the axial ion peak are created by additional mechanisms and that body geometry affects the mid-wake structure only when the sheath is sufficiently thin to conform to the shape of the body.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 385 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clayden, W. A. 1963 Rarefield Gas Dyn. 2, 435.Google Scholar
Clayden, W. A. & Hurdle, C. V. 1966 Rarefield Gas Dyn. 2, 1717.Google Scholar
Fournier, G. & Pigache, D. 1975 Phys. Fluids, 18, 1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. F., & Kemp, R. E. & Sellen, J. M. 1964 AIAA J. 2, 1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C. L. & Samir, U. 1967 Planet. Space Sci. 15, 1499.Google Scholar
Hester, S. D. & Sonin, A. A. 1970 AIAA J. 8, 1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knott, K. & Pedersen, A. 1970 Eldo-Cecles/ESRO-CERS Scient. and Tech. Rev. 2, 499.Google Scholar
Martin, A. R. 1974 Planet. Space Sci. 22, 121.Google Scholar
Oran, W. A., Stone, N. H. & Samir, U. 1974 Planet. Space Sci. 22, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oran, W. A., Stone, N. H. & Samir, U. 1975 J. Geophys. Res. 80, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samir, U., Stone, N. H. & Oran, W. A. 1974 Astrophys. and Space Sci. 31, L1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skvortsov, V. V. & Nosachev, L. V. 1968 a Cosmic Res. 6, 191.Google Scholar
Skvortsov, V. V. & Nosachev, L. V. 1968 b Cosmic Res. 6, 718.Google Scholar
Stone, N. H. & Rehmann, W. K. 1970 NASA Report TN-D-5894.Google Scholar
Stone, N. H., Oran, W. A. & Samir, U. 1972 Planet. Space Sci. 20, 1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, N. H., Samir, U. & Oran, W. A. 1974 J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 36, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, N. H. 1979 Ph. D. dissertation, University of Alabama in Huntsville.Google Scholar
Stone, N. H. 1981 J. Plasma Phys. 25, 351.Google Scholar