Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:28:51.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Building a weak shockwave from linear modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2022

Antoine Bret
Affiliation:
ETSI Industriales, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain Instituto de Investigaciones Energéticas y Aplicaciones Industriales, Campus Universitario de Ciudad Real, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
Ramesh Narayan*
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Harvard University, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: antoineclaude.bret@uclm.es

Abstract

In shockwave theory, the density, velocity and pressure jumps are derived from the conservation equations. Here, we address the physics of a weak shock the other way around. We first show that the density profile of a weak shockwave in a fluid can be expressed as a sum of linear acoustic modes. The shock so built propagates at the speed of sound and matter is exactly conserved at the front crossing. Yet, momentum and energy are only conserved up to order 0 in powers of the shock amplitude. The density, velocity and pressure jumps are similar to those of a fluid shock, and an equivalent Mach number can be defined. A similar process is possible in magnetohydrodynamics. Yet, such a decomposition is found impossible for collisionless shocks due to the dispersive nature of ion acoustic waves. Weakly nonlinear corrections to their frequency do not solve the problem. Weak collisionless shocks could be inherently nonlinear, non-amenable to any linear superposition. Or they could be non-existent, as hinted by recent works.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Affolter, M., Anderegg, F., Dubin, D.H.E., Valentini, F. & Driscoll, C.F. 2019 Fluid and kinetic nonlinearities of near-acoustic plasma waves. Phys. Plasmas 26 (12), 122108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogh, A. & Treumann, R.A. 2013 Physics of Collisionless Shocks: Space Plasma Shock Waves. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, R.L., Brunner, S., Chapman, T., Divol, L., Still, C.H. & Valeo, E.J. 2013 Electron and ion kinetic effects on non-linearly driven electron plasma and ion acoustic waves. Phys. Plasmas 20 (3), 032107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bret, A. & Narayan, R. 2018 Density jump as a function of magnetic field strength for parallel collisionless shocks in pair plasmas. J. Plasma Phys. 84 (6), 905840604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, A., Hadjadj, A., Sadot, O. & Ben-Dor, G. 2013 Numerical study of shock-wave mitigation through matrices of solid obstacles. Shock Waves 23 (1), 91101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galeev, A.A. 1976 Collisionless shocks. In Physics of Solar Planetary Environement; Proceedings of the International Symposium on Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Boulder, CO, June 7–18, 1976 (ed. Williams, D.J.), pp. 464490. AGU.Google Scholar
Guo, X., Sironi, L. & Narayan, R. 2018 Electron heating in low Mach number perpendicular shocks. II. Dependence on the pre-shock conditions. Astrophys. J. 858 (2), 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha, J.-H., Ryu, D., Kang, H. & van Marle, A. J. 2018 Proton acceleration in weak quasi-parallel intracluster shocks: injection and early acceleration. Astrophys. J. 864 (2), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggerty, C. C, Bret, A. & Caprioli, D. 2021 Kinetic simulations of strongly magnetized parallel shocks: deviations from MHD jump conditions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509 (2), 20842090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, H., Ryu, D. & Ha, J.-H. 2019 Electron preacceleration in weak quasi-perpendicular shocks in high-beta intracluster medium. Astrophys. J. 876 (1), 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennel, C.F., Edmiston, J.P. & Hada, T. 1985 A quarter century of collisionless shock research. In Collisionless Shocks in the Heliosphere: A Tutorial Review (A87-25326 09-92), pp. 136. American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
Krall, N.A. 1997 What do we really know about collisionless shocks? Adv. Space Res. 20 (4–5), 715724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulsrud, R. M 2005 Plasma Physics for Astrophysics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L.D. & Lifshitz, E.M. 2013 Fluid Mechanics. Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Lemoine, M., Ramos, O. & Gremillet, L. 2016 Corrugation of relativistic magnetized shock waves. Astrophys. J. 827 (1), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, K.S. & Blandford, R.D. 2017 Modern Classical Physics: Optics, Fluids, Plasmas, Elasticity, Relativity, and Statistical Physics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tidman, D.A. & Krall, N.A. 1971 Shock Waves in Collisionless Plasmas. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Tran, M.Q. 1979 Ion acoustic solitons in a plasma: a review of their experimental properties and related theories. Phys. Scr. 20, 317327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouchuk, J.G. 2001 Growth rate of the linear Richtmyer-Meshkov instability when a shock is reflected. Phys. Rev. E 63 (5), 056303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zel'dovich, Y. B & Raizer, Y. P 2002 Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena. Dover Publications.Google Scholar