Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:22:21.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Networking and the Social and Emotional Wellbeing of Adolescents in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2014

Amanda Bourgeois ,
Julie Bower  and
Annemaree Carroll Open the ORCID record for Annemaree Carroll [Opens in a new window]
Amanda Bourgeois
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Education, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Julie Bower*
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Education, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Annemaree Carroll
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, School of Education, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Dr Julie Bower, The University of Queensland, School of Education, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia. Email: j.bower@uq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

Technology and social networking tools and sites are changing the way young people build and maintain their social connections with others (Boyd & Ellison, 2008). This study utilised a new measure, The Self in a Social Context, Virtual Connectedness subscale (SSC-VC subscale), to examine the effects of social networking tools and sites on social and emotional wellbeing among 1,037 Australian young people aged 11–18 years. A maximum likelihood factor analysis identified three strong factors: Fit In (α = .81), Public Self (α = .79) and Connected Self (α = .83). Significant main effects were revealed for the number of times students checked their Facebook F(12, 2415) = 13.8, p < .001, and for gender, F(3, 913) = 10.8, p < .001, but no interaction effect was found. Univariate tests also revealed a significant difference for Frequency of checking Facebook, F(4, 915), = 4.98, and for Gender, F(1, 915), = 46.92, p < .001 on the dependent variable of Emotional Difficulties. These findings suggest that social networking sites, though used differently by males and females, provide an important forum for building social connections across groups.

Keywords

social connectednesssocial networking sitessocial and emotional wellbeinggender differences
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , December 2014 , pp. 167 - 182
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). (2011). Social media and the kids: Some benefits and some worries. Retrieved from http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/pages/Social-Media-and-Kids-Some-Benefits,-Some-Worries.aspxGoogle Scholar
Barnett, C. (2009). Towards a methodology of postmodern assemblage: Adolescent identity in the age of social networking. Philosophical Studies in Education, 40, 200–210.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social networking sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Buckingham, D. (Ed.), MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning — Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.danah.org/papers/WhyYouthHeart.pdfGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A., & Bower, J. (2012). The self in a Social Context Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Bourgeois, A., Tan, C., & Ozsoy, A. (in press). Reputational orientations, loneliness and positive mental well-being during adolescence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Health.Google Scholar
Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Durkin, K., & Hattie, J. (2009). Adolescent reputations and risk: Developmental trajectories to delinquency. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsano, P., Majorano, M., & Champretavy, L. (2006). Psychological well-being in adolescence, the contribution of interpersonal relations and experience of being alone. Adolescence, 41 (162), 341–353.Google ScholarPubMed
Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation 10 (7). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, A.G., Sulkowski, M.L., Nichols, R., & Storch, E.A. (2009). Differences between peer victimization in cyber and physical settings and associated psychosocial adjustment in early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 46 (10), 962–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duru, E. (2008). The predictive analysis of adjustment difficulties from loneliness, social support, and social connectedness. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 8 (3), 849–856.Google Scholar
Hall-Lande, J.A., Eisenberg, M.E., Christenson, S.L., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2007). Social isolation, psychological health, and protective factors in adolescence. Adolescence, 42, 265–286.Google Scholar
Harman, J., Hansen, C.E., Cochran, M.E., & Lindsey, C.R. (2005). Liar, liar: Internet faking but not frequency of use of affects social skills, self-esteem, social anxiety, and aggression. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J.W. (2011). Cyberbulling: A review of the legal issues facing educators. Preventing School Failure, 55 (2), 71–78. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2011.539433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, P.E., Ryan, N., & Pryor, J. (2012). Does social connectedness promote a greater sense of well-being in adolescence over time? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22 (2), 235–251.Google Scholar
Lee, M., Draper, M., & Lee, S. (2001). Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a Mediator Model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48 (3), 310–318.Google Scholar
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_Jan_2007.pdfGoogle Scholar
Libbey, H.P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of School Health, 74, 274–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Society, 10, 393–411. doi:10.1177/1461444808089415Google Scholar
McGraw, K., Moore, S., Fuller, A., & Bates, G. (2008). Family, peer and school connectedness in final year secondary school students. Australian Psychologist, 43, 27–37.Google Scholar
Mellor, D. (2005). Normative data for the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 40 (3), 215–222.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, G.S., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127 (4), 800–804. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0054Google Scholar
Patchin, J.W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148–169.Google Scholar
Paul, P. (2012, January 20). Cracking teenagers’ online codes. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/fashion/danah-boyd-cracking-teenagers-online-codes.html?pagewanted=allGoogle Scholar
Pederson, H. (2012). Challenging cyber bullying: Tips and strategies for parents. San Rafael, CA: Marin Office Education.Google Scholar
Reich, S.M. (2010). Adolescents’ sense of community on MySpace and Facebook: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Community Psychology, 38 (6), 688–705.Google Scholar
Slagter van Tryon, P.J, & Bishop, M.J. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education, 30 (3), 291–315.Google Scholar
Strom, P., & Strom, R. (2012). Growing up with social networks and online communities. Education Digest: Essential readings Condensed for Quick Review, 78 (1), 48–51.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. Future of Children, 18 (1), 119–148.Google Scholar
Szwedo, D.E., Mikami, A., & Allen, J.P. (2012). Social networking site use predicts changes in young adults’ psychological adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22 (3), 453–466.Google Scholar
Valkenburg, P.M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43 (2), 267–277. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267Google Scholar
Willard, N.E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar