Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:44:29.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is a Kiss Just a Kiss?: Predicting Variations in Motives for Romantic Kissing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2017

Elle A. Moore ,
Danica Kulibert  and
Ashley E. Thompson
Elle A. Moore*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA
Danica Kulibert
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA
Ashley E. Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Elle A. Moore, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Department of Psychology, 800 Algoma Blvd., Oshkosh, WI, 54901, USA. Email: mooree70@uwosh.edu
Get access

Abstract

Romantic kissing is vastly understudied in scientific research, with only one study systematically examining romantic kissing motives and associated gender differences. The current study explored motives for romantic kissing in greater detail by examining whether gender, age, relationship status, sexual attitudes, and personality predicted variations in adults’ romantic kissing motives. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses (N = 461) revealed that those with more permissive sexual attitudes, higher levels of extraversion, those currently in committed relationships and those younger in age were most likely to endorse relational/sexual motives for romantic kissing. Goal attainment/insecurity motives were most frequently endorsed by men and those with more permissive sexual attitudes, higher levels of extraversion, lower levels of agreeableness, and lower levels of conscientiousness. Results emphasise the importance of a variety of variables in understanding motives for romantic kissing.

Keywords

romantic kissingmotivationgenderpersonalitysexual attitudes
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 8 , 2017 , e3
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alterovitz, S., & Mendelsohn, G. (2013). Relationship goals of middle-aged, young-old, and old-old internet daters: An analysis of online personal ads. Journal of Aging Studies, 27, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, H., & Reissing, E. (2015). Women's motivations to have sex in casual and committed relationships with male and female partners. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 921–934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, G., Malamuth, N., & Check, J. (1984). Personality and sexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 51–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J.L., Volk, K.D., & Hyde, J.S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLamater, J., & Sill, M. (2005). Sexual desire in later life. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 138–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, S., & O'Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 150–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H.J. (1972). Personality and sexual behaviour. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 16, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, W., Byrne, D., White, L., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, J.H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 1–43.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R., & Gough, H.G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiling, H., & Buss, D.M. (2000). Women's sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.
Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Carter, S.M., Lehto, A.T., & Elliot, A.J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1284–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S., & Reich, D. (2006). The Brief Sexual Attitudes Scale. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 76–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, C.A., & Preston, L.K. (1996). Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation: Theory and measurement of dispositional sexual motives. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth-Bocks, A. (1996). Personality, sensation seeking, and risk-taking behavior in a college population. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 1, 53–61.Google Scholar
Leigh, B.C. (1989). Reasons for having and avoiding sex: Gender, sexual orientation, and relationship to sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahieu, L., & Gastmans, C. (2015). Older residents’ perspectives on aged sexuality ininstitutionalized elderly care: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52, 1891–1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meston, C.M., & Buss, D.M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meston, C., Hamilton, L., & Harte, C. (2009). Sexual motivation in women as a function of age. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 3305–3319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J., Lynam, D., Zimmerman, R., Logan, T., Leukefold, C., & Clayton, R. (2003). The utility of the five factor model in understanding risky sexual behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1611–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, L.R., Cheng, M.M., Harris, K.M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2007). ‘I wanna hold your hand’: The progression of social, romantic, and sexual events in adolescent relationships. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, J., Rhoades, G., Stanley, S., & Fincham, F. (2010). ‘Hooking up’ among college students: Demographic and psycho-social correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, P., Durvasula, R., Howell, L., Ureño, O., & Rea, M. (2004). Gender, ethnicity, and the developmental timing of first sexual and romantic experiences. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 667–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seal, D., & Ehrhardt, A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 5, 295 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, D.C., & Byers, E.S. (2013). Heterosexual daters’ sexual initiation behaviors: Use of the theory of planned behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Štulhofer, A., Ferreira, L., & Landripet, I. (2014). Emotional intimacy, sexual desire, and sexual satisfaction among partnered heterosexual men. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Thompson, A.E., Kulibert, D., & Anisimowicz, Y. (2016, November). Why do we kiss?: The development of a scale measuring motives for romantic kissing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
Townsend, J., & Wasserman, T. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1173–1181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turchik, J., Garske, J., Probst, D., & Irvin, C. (2010). Personality, sexuality, and substance use as predictors of sexual risk taking in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 411–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vannier, S.A., & O'Sullivan, L.F. (2012). Who gives and who gets: Why, when, and with whom young people engage in oral sex. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 41, 572–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, D., Haugen, P., Widman, L., Darling, N., & Grello, C. (2005). Kissing is good: A developmental investigation of sexuality in adolescent couples. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiederman, M. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13, 496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlodarski, R. & Dunbar, R.M. (2013). Examining the possible functions of kissing in romantic relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1415–1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wlodarski, R. & Dunbar, R.M. (2014). What's in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mate desirability. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, H., & Bartle-Haring, S. (2014). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40, 275–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed