Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:20:44.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roman Britain in 1934

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , 1935 , pp. 201 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © 1935. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Arch. Cambr., lxxxiv, 1.

2 Ibid., xc, 151.

3 Now on loan in the Ashmolean Museum.

4 Arch. Cambr. xc, 159–161.

4A For two bronze statuettes found at Perth and Edinburgh, see pl. XLIII, 2, a and b.

5 Arch. Ael.4 xi, 227 ff.

6 Arch. Ael.4 xii, 247 ff., 204 ff.

7 See also Cumb. and Westm. Antiq. and Arch. Soc. Trans.2 XXXV, 1935, 220 ffGoogle Scholar.

8 Ibid. p. 251 ff.

9 Ibid. p. 250 f.

10 Ibid. p. 254.

11 Ibid. p. 213.

12 Ibid. p. 217 f.

13 Ibid. p. 214 ff.

14 Ibid. p. 256 ff.

15 Ibid. p. 159 ff.

16 Proc. Soc. Ant. Newc.4 vi, 1934, 239Google Scholar.

17 Cumb. and Westm. Arch. Soc. Trans. 2 xxxiv, 50ff.

18 Ibid. XXXV, 1935, 285.

19 YAJ xxxii, 229.

20 e.g. Collingwood, , Archaeology of Roman Britain, p. 94, fig. 24Google Scholar, Elgee, , Archaeology of Yorkshire, p. 164, fig. 28Google Scholar.

21 YAJ xxxii, 231.

22 Excavations at the Roman Fort at Brough, East Yorkshire, 1934, Second Interim Report. (Price 1s. from the Secretary of the Excavation Committee, University College, Hull.)

23 YAJ xxxii, 214ff.

24 Keighley News, Dec., 1934.

25 Annals of Arch. and Anthrop. (Liverpool) xxii, 19ff., to the Editor of which we are indebted for the block of fig. 25 (p. 227, below).

26 Lady Manners School Magazine, iii, 29.

27 An excellent paper on Roman Lincolnshire by Mr. C. W. Phillips, F. S. A., has been published in the Arch. Journ. xci, 110 ff.; it treats particularly well the roads, canals and earthworks.

28 Collingwood, , Archaeology of Roman Britain, pp. 223 and 224Google Scholar, forms 30 and 73. For the Early Iron Age discoveries see Antiqs. Journ. XV, 456. Some of the vessels are in Scunthorpe Museum.

29 Numis. Chron. xiv, 1934, 216 ffGoogle Scholar.

30 VCH Notts. ii, 6 and 34 ff.

31 It seems that the sculptured stone at Elston Hall (JRS XXII, 206) was found here. Gents. Mag. 1790, i, 18, 116.

32 Numis. Chron. XV, 1935, 57 ffGoogle Scholar. The hoard is now in the Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge.

33 Proc. of Prehistoric Soc. of E. Anglia, vii, 1934, 425Google Scholar.

34 Antiqs. Journ. XV, 1935, 113Google Scholar.

35 Cambs. and Hunts. Arch. Soc. Trans. v, 266.

36 H. E. Forrest, Shrops. N and Q., 26th January, 1934. This road was observed from the air in 1929 on the line suggested in VCH Salop, i, 269.

37 Antiquary l, 1935, p. 217; cf. Haverfield, F., Roman Occupation of Britain, p. 217Google Scholar.

38 Mattingly, , Numis. Chron. xiv, 1934, 219 fGoogle Scholar.

39 St. Albans and Herts. Archit. and Arch. Soc. Trans., 1934, 166 ff. and forthcoming issue of The Antiqs. Journ.

40 Norfolk Archaeology XXV, 426 f.

41 Numis. Chron. xv, 1935, 51 fGoogle Scholar.

42 Published by Covernton, J. G. in Essex Arch. Soc. Trans. xxi, 219Google Scholar.

43 For the position, see JRS IX, 157, no. 86.

44 For an interesting hoard of barbarous coins see Numis. Chron. xiv, 1934, 255 ffGoogle Scholar.

45 R. C. H. M. Roman London, pp. 89–90.

46 R. C. H. M. Roman London, p. 121.

47 JRS XXIV, 211.

48 Trans. Bristol and Gloucs. Arch. Soc. lv, 377; lvi, 99 ff. The tanks are shown, with two others at Cambridge, on pl. XXXVI for comparison. For an interesting Teutonic-looking bowl found in Period III level, see below p. 227, fig. 26, and for a hoard of minimissimi found near here see Trans. Bristol and Gloucs. Arch. Soc. lvi, 133 ff.

49 Now in Gloucester Museum. Haverfield, F., Roman Britain in 1914, p. 22Google Scholar.

50 For Fortuna see Espérandieu, , Bas-reliefs de la Gaule romaine, vii, 5727Google Scholar, viii, 6318; Bas-reliefs de la Germanie romaine, no. 409. For the Juppiter column, Ibid. vii, 5887, p. 379 and x, p. 95, where the goddess is said to have been identified as Rosmerta or as Maia or even as Emporia or Salus; the first is the more probable. A report is published in the Bristol and Gloucs. Arch. Soc. Trans, lvi, 65 ff.

51 Dunning, , Trans. Bristol and Gloucs. Arch, Soc. lvi, 129Google Scholar.

52 JRS XII, 263; XIV, 232.

53 Wilts Arch. Mag. xlvii, 114.

54 Cf. Reinach Bronzes figurés de la Gaule romaine, p. 277 ff., and Cultes, mythes et religions i, 233 ff.; Toutain, Les Cultes paiens iii, 283 ff.; F. Heichelheim gives a full list in P-W, s.v. ‘Tarvos-Trigaranus.’

55 Wheeler, R. E. M., Antiqs. Journ. XV, 265Google Scholar.

56 Devon. Arch. Explor. Soc. Proc. ii, 1934, 81Google Scholar.

57 Harris, W. E. in Berks Arch. Journ. xxxix, 1935, 93Google Scholar.

58 See JRS xix, 208; xxiv, 216.

59 Surrey Arch. Coll. xliii, 1935, 16Google Scholar. Cf. also VCH Surrey, iv, 353, 361.

60 Sussex Arch. Coll. lxxvi, 138 ff., 156 ff.

61 Ibid. p. 7.

62 Miss Robertson, in Numis. Chron. XV, 1935, 62 ffGoogle Scholar.

63 Antiqs. Journ. xv, 1935, 208 ffGoogle Scholar.