We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Kathy Arthurson (2012), Social Mix and the City: Challenging the Mixed Communities Consensus in Housing and Urban Planning Policies. Collingwood, Australia: CIRSO. £48.95, pp. 141, pbk.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
19 October 2012
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
DeLuca, S., Duncan, G., Mendenhall, R. and Keels, M. (2011), ‘The notable and the null: using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs’, in Van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L. and Maclennan, D. (eds.), Neighbourhood Effects: New Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Johnston, C. (2003) ‘Tendencies, community and the (re)development of public housing estate – a background paper’, Shelter, Sydney, New South Wales.Google Scholar
Small, M. L. and Feldman, J. (2012), ‘Ethnographic evidence, heterogeneity, and neigbourhood effects after moving to opportunity’, in Van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L. and Maclennan, D. (eds.), Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ham, M. and Manley, D. (2010), ‘The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix on labour market outcomes: a longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects’, Journal of Economic Geography, 10: 2, 257–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (1986), The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar