Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T21:38:30.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temporal Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2009

ROBERT E. GOODIN
ROBERT E. GOODIN*
Affiliation:
Distinguished Professor of Social and Political Theory and of Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia email: goodinb@coombs.anu.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Distributive justice is ordinarily calibrated in monetary terms. But money is not the only resource that matters to people. Talk of the ‘work−life balance’ points to another: time. Control over one's time, the capacity to spend it as one wishes, is another important resource; and its distribution raises another important aspect of justice. Here I describe a new method of distinguishing how much time one has discretionary control over, net of the amount it is necessary to spend in certain ways given one's circumstances. To draw out the distributive-justice implications of these calculations, I contrast the most-to-least privileged, in terms of discretionary time: a person in a dual-earner couple with no children, versus a lone mother. The magnitude of the gap between the discretionary time enjoyed by the best and worst is a measure of temporal injustice. That gap is substantially larger in some countries (such as the US and Australia) than in others (such as Finland and Sweden). Conventional welfare-state interventions – tax and transfer systems, support for child care – contribute pretty similarly to reducing that particular gap across all the countries examined. Differing practices surrounding the dissolution of marriages with children potentially makes a much bigger difference. Differing labour-market policies might make a similarly large difference yet again.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E. (1999), ‘What is the point of equality?’, Ethics, 109: 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. (1997), ‘Egalitarianism and the undeserving poor’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 5: 327–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. (2000), ‘Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism’, Ethics, 110: 339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1998), Poverty in Europe, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Folbre, N. (2008), Valuing Children, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J. (2005), ‘Businessiness as the badge of honor for the new superordinate working class’, Social Research, 72: 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1998), ‘Social welfare as a collective social responsibility’, in Schmidtz, D. and Goodin, R. E. (eds.), Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E., Headey, B., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H.-J. (1999), The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R. E., Rice, J. M., Parpo, A. and Eriksson, L. (2008), Discretionary Time: A New Measure of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (1997), The Time Bind, New York: Metropolitan Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (2000), ‘Faces of inequality: gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states’, Social Politics, 7: 127–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (1992), ‘Gender and welfare regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 2: 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (1997), ‘Gender and welfare regimes: further thoughts’, Social Politics, 4: 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, A. (2002), Women's Employment and Welfare Regimes, Social Policy and Development Paper No. 12, Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, S. (1988), ‘Direct and indirect measures of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 17: 351–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. P. and Godbey, G. (1999), Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time, 2nd edn, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Schor, J. B. (1991), The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. (1998), ‘Social welfare as an individual responsibility’, in Schmidtz, D. and Goodin, R. E., Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikler, D. (1987), ‘Personal responsibility for illness’, in van de Veer, D. and Regan, T. (eds.), Health Care Ethics, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar