We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Armine Ishkanian and Simon Szreter (eds.) (2012), The Big Society Debate: A New Agenda for Social Welfare?Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. £19.95, pp. 227, pbk
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
08 April 2013
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Atkinson, W., Roberts, S. and Savage, M. (2012), ‘Introduction’, in Atkinson, W., Roberts, S. and Savage, M. (eds.), Class Inequality in Austerity Britain: Power, Difference and Suffering, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Gillies, V. (2012), ‘Personalising poverty: parental determinism and the Big Society agenda’, in Atkinson, W., Roberts, S. and Savage, M. (eds.), Class Inequality in Austerity Britain: Power, Difference and Suffering, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 90–110.Google Scholar
Kerr, P., Byrne, C. and Foster, E. (2011), ‘Theorising Cameronism’, Political Studies Review, 9: 2, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitas, R. (2012), ‘The just's umbrella: austerity and the big society in coalition policy and beyond’, Critical Social Policy, 32: 3, 320–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar